Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 Full story: TurkishPress.com 70,980

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Full Story
Henry

Chemnitz, Germany

#71582 Apr 25, 2013
John wrote:
No they are fighting/lashing out at God. Most of them. This forum has gone on for years and it happens with or without me. You think simple disbelief has carried the forum in all its venom this long? The evidence speaks otherwise. Speaking of evidence. Do you have any in this arena you hold others accountable to?
I've already exposed your standard of evidence yet you want ME to provide YOU evidence in your forum. Let me guess you'll be the arbiter. Your forum insists on fighting God, you can't stay away from him. I've made it clear, apparently you don't read my posts that I don't debate nothing. God is merely an axe and diversion created by loons to mask their nothing agenda.
You've made the claim there is no God so prove it. That's your deal and problem whether its impossible or not. I've offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief you want to make a case for. You have failed miserably. Not my problem.
Regurgitating tired nonpoints despite four years of me being clear makes it obvious you have no intention of doing anything other than projecting. Nothing certainly is not the answer.
Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe.%1
I don`t have to proof, that there is no god, why should I? There were thousands of mythical gods in the human history, but none of them was a reality. That is enough proof to me, there is no such things like a god at all!
Henry

Chemnitz, Germany

#71583 Apr 25, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry-- there are 1000's of competitive gods, all of which have various versions of hell.
Since it patently >>impossible<< to please them all?
You're so gonna end up in one of the hells-- likely in several.
Or else?
It's all bullsh7t.
Only very uneducated people are not able to see religions are just fakes!
Henry

Chemnitz, Germany

#71584 Apr 25, 2013
wanderinglanternweilder wrote:
when he sends me to hell..
You might get into a nuclear inferno in a capitalist world!
John

Atwater, OH

#71585 Apr 25, 2013
A nothing stumping statist. Tell us about controlled markets and natural origins Henry. I suspect you will be just like the other loons and latch on to something else instead. Atheists hate accountability.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71586 Apr 25, 2013
John wrote:
A nothing stumping statist. Tell us about controlled markets and natural origins Henry. I suspect you will be just like the other loons and latch on to something else instead. Atheists hate accountability.
Shut the f*ck up john, you've got no proof of god.

Lets all watch you post more no proof of god.

You and your nothing.
Imhotep

United States

#71587 Apr 25, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry-- there are 1000's of competitive gods, all of which have various versions of hell.
Since it patently >>impossible<< to please them all?
You're so gonna end up in one of the hells-- likely in several.
Or else?
It's all bullsh7t.
I received a free pass to Purgatory don't you have yours?

By the way I have finished in the lake of fire
Bottom feeders only

When you try to toss them back
They float
Thinking

Sturminster Newton, UK

#71588 Apr 25, 2013
68000+ posts and you have still no proof of god.
Get your nothing out of here!:D
John wrote:
A nothing stumping statist. Tell us about controlled markets and natural origins Henry. I suspect you will be just like the other loons and latch on to something else instead. Atheists hate accountability.
John

Atwater, OH

#71589 Apr 25, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Shut the f*ck up john, you've got no proof of god.
Lets all watch you post more no proof of god.
You and your nothing.
No. Would you like to debate the evidences of my something to your nothing?

This forum is a continuous laugh track. Go write atheism is simply disbelief one hundred times on the chalkboard. Your nothing will continue to get bitchslapped each time you engage in this absurd charade.
John

Atwater, OH

#71590 Apr 25, 2013
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle ithought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence Bob, Septic, Tinkling,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 68,723 posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71591 Apr 25, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
He never did. He did run away for a few months, when forced into a corner.
But he never even bothered so much as an argument in support.
When he returned? He started SPAMMING the same cut-and-past-- complete with grammatical errors.
I guess everyone has their own way of dealing with not being happy. Some want to make others feel that way too, it seems.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71592 Apr 25, 2013
Logic wrote:
Whatever entity set the laws of physics, that is God. How dumb does someone have to be to not see the obvious. A rock falls to the ground. It follows a law. That law was set in place somehow. The lawgiver is God by definition. If you want to use a different word, fine, it is still the ruler of the physical universe. The universe you live in. To deny it is to deny reality. The real question is, is there more than the physical universe. Conscious Thought would seem to indicate the potential for something outside the physical universe. It just depends if you choose to be narrow minded or broad minded.(Guess who is narrow?)
You realized that the first time you saw a rock fall to the ground, or did you read someone else saying that is what happens? Just looking for clarification. Thanks.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71593 Apr 25, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry-- there are 1000's of competitive gods, all of which have various versions of hell.
Since it patently >>impossible<< to please them all?
You're so gonna end up in one of the hells-- likely in several.
Or else?
It's all bullsh7t.
Gee, wouldn't it be a real drag if they all existed and we had to endure all of the various versions of hell? Now that would be Hell.:)

Personally, I kind of think living my life to see if I can be meaningful to someone, even if just myself, is more attractive than worrying about some hell that some ancient people drummed up to scare each other. I will however try to keep my nose clean so that others don't make my life on earth a hell.

Perhaps those who live with expectations of hell after death, if they don't follow a set course, have found their life on earth has been a hell of their own making.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71594 Apr 25, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you mean well, but this mammal is the consummate narcissist.
I suggest you limit a reply, if one is necessary, to no more than one line, 2 is a real stretch.
His limited capacity to comprehend much more than a few syllables is obvious.
I am Imhotepİ and I approve this Public service announcement
Thanks for the valuable announcement, and I am going to endeavor to avoid any replies to him in the future. My goal to not be nasty with other posters kind of prohibits more replies to him anyway.:)

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71595 Apr 25, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Telling an atheist he is going to hell?
Is the EXACT same as telling YOU that Caspir The Friendly Ghost will HAUNT you if you are naughty.
EXACTLY the same thing.
Now Bob just because God doesn't exist doesn't mean that Caspir the friendly ghost is non existing too. I think I read about him in comic books when I was a kid. That means he exists, doesn't it?

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#71596 Apr 25, 2013
Why am I the only person who has posted here in recent minutes, and why didn't I scroll ahead to see if the thread is empty before wasting all those really important posts I just made?
John

Atwater, OH

#71597 Apr 25, 2013
Feel free to make posts avoiding your illogical nothing booots. I enjoy them. After four years it is clear you bigots have no intention of addressing your exposed standard or antitheism.

Prime mover wins again. No challengers!
John

Atwater, OH

#71598 Apr 25, 2013
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. Yawn.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
%2
Thinking

Sturminster Newton, UK

#71599 Apr 25, 2013
Bollocks.
John wrote:
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. Yawn.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
%2
Alliances

Voorhees, NJ

#71600 Apr 25, 2013
hey pray for God to get me a girlfriend.. I believe in him.. with big boobs!! and great Ass!!
Alliances

Voorhees, NJ

#71601 Apr 25, 2013
no i'm serious.. i believe in him.. pray that.. he is mad at me and won't give me nothin cuz i sin too much so i gotta have someone else pray for me..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Christianity Created Hitler 18 min Uncle Sam 130
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 hr ChristineM 234,526
Our world came from nothing? (Jul '14) 5 hr thetruth 1,233
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 5 hr thetruth 2,841
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 hr thetruth 14,507
Richard Dawkins needs to get a life Mon Thinking 22
Is 'naturalism' a bleak philosophical outlook? ... Sun polymath257 41
More from around the web