• Sections
Atheists on the march in America

# Atheists on the march in America

There are 70645 comments on the TurkishPress.com story from Aug 26, 2009, titled Atheists on the march in America. In it, TurkishPress.com reports that:

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TurkishPress.com.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71224 Apr 14, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
"<<<<<< <<<<<<< <<<<<<< <<<<<<< <<
The age of the universe is defined inphysical cosmology as the time elapsed since the Big Bang. The best estimate of the age of the universe, as of 22 March 2013, is 13.798 Â± 0.037 billion years (4.351âÂ±â0.017 Ã 1017 seconds) within the Lambda-CDM concordance model. The uncertainty of 37 million years has been obtained by the agreement of a number of scientific research projects, such as microwave background radiation measurements by the Planck satellite, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and other probes. Measurements of the cosmic background radiation give the cooling timeof the universe since the Big Bang, and measurements of the expansion rate of the universe can be used to calculate its approximate age by extrapolating backwards in time.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_uni...
Hubble Time
The inverse of the Hubble constant H has the units of time because the Hubble law is
v = H d
where v is the velocity of recession, H is the Hubble constant, and d is the distance. Thus, from this equation, we have that 1/H = d/v. but d/v is distance divided by velocity, which is time (e.g., if I travel 180 miles at 60 miles/hour, the time required is t = d/v = 180/60 = 3 hours).
Thus, the Hubble time T is just the inverse of the Hubble Constant:
T = 1 / H
Taking a value of H = 20 km/s/Mly (where Mly means mega-light years),
where all the factors are necessary to convert the time units to years and I've rounded some numbers to simplify the display.
The physical interpretation of the Hubble time is that it gives the time for the Universe to run backwards to the Big Bang if the expansion rate (the Hubble "constant") were constant. Thus, it is a measure of the age of the Universe. The Hubble "constant" actually isn't constant, so the Hubble time is really only a rough estimate of the age of the Universe.
Reasonable assumptions for the value of the Hubble constant and the geometry of the Universe typically yield ages of 10-20 billion years for the age of the Universe. For example, H near 50 km/s/Mpc gives a larger value for the age of the Universe (around 16 thousand million years), while a larger value of 80 km/s/Mpc gives a lower value for the age (around 10 thousand million years). Therefore, we shall take this information, and additional information from other methods to estimate the age of the Universe that we have not discussed, to indicate an age of approximately 15 billion years for the Universe.
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmo...
April 24, 2002 â The Hubble Space Telescope has read the embers of burnt-out stars to come up with a new way of estimating the universeâs age, scientists said Wednesday. The latest age estimate â 13 billion to 14 billion years â is consistent with the conclusions reached using other methods.
Past observations of faraway celestial objects known as Cepheid variable stars have yielded estimates of 12 billion to 15 billion years for the universeâs age. But those observations depended on assumptions related to how the universe has expanded over those billions of years.
Another method, used by the European Southern Observatory, depended on estimating the rate of radioactive decay within old stars. The European researchers came up with a figure of more than 12.5 billion years.
University of Chicago astrophysicist Michael Turner, commenting on the latest research, said that further studies were essential because the question of the universeâs age is so fundamental to our understanding of the cosmos.
âWhatâs exciting is, weâre now making enough measurements that we can do these critical tests for age consistency,â he toldMSNBC.com .
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3077812/" ;
The only article atheists ever ask godbots for is proof of god.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#71225 Apr 14, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
The only article atheists ever ask godbots for is proof of god.
Correct.

Because atheists already KNOW the science...

...

:D

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71226 Apr 14, 2013
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle ithought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence Bob, Septic, Tinkling,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 68,402 posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71227 Apr 14, 2013
No they are fighting/lashing out at God. Most of them. This forum has gone on for years and it happens with or without me. You think simple disbelief has carried the forum in all its venom this long? The evidence speaks otherwise. Speaking of evidence. Do you have any in this arena you hold others accountable to?
I've already exposed your standard of evidence yet you want ME to provide YOU evidence in your forum. Let me guess you'll be the arbiter. Your forum insists on fighting God, you can't stay away from him. I've made it clear, apparently you don't read my posts that I don't debate nothing. God is merely an axe and diversion created by loons to mask their nothing agenda.
You've made the claim there is no God so prove it. That's your deal and problem whether its impossible or not. I've offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief you want to make a case for. You have failed miserably. Not my problem.
Regurgitating tired nonpoints despite four years of me being clear makes it obvious you have no intention of doing anything other than projecting. Nothing certainly is not the answer.
Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe. 6

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71228 Apr 14, 2013
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. Yawn.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71229 Apr 14, 2013
Another day of ineptitude from the antitheists.*Note to lurkers* They have gone almost four years without giving one accountable position they are willing to debate. Four years without an example of evidence that meets their criteria for evidence. These are angry agenda driven folks that don't give a damn about the evidence.
If you want to subject yourself to this farce by all means see for yourself. Antitheists you could also just cut and paste one of the 68,406 posts to show otherwise.
Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe. True
science that is repeatable and observable.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71230 Apr 14, 2013
John wrote:
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. Yawn.
Ahh shaddup - you're just as godless as the rest of us. Except you can't man up to reality and whine like a bitch at atheists when IT ISN'T EVEN OUR FAULT YOU HAVE NO PROOF OF GOD.
Lincoln

United States

#71231 Apr 14, 2013
Belief is involuntary; nothing involuntary is meritorious or reprehensible. A man ought not to be considered worse or better for his belief.

Percy Bysshe Shelley,
"Declaration of Rights"

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#71232 Apr 14, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
Belief is involuntary; nothing involuntary is meritorious or reprehensible. A man ought not to be considered worse or better for his belief.
Percy Bysshe Shelley,
"Declaration of Rights"
bullshit, belief takes a conscious effort.
John

United States

#71233 Apr 14, 2013
I disagree but since you are an atheist who simply has disbelief I would hate for you to jeopardize your forums contentions. Five years in LOL.
Imhotep
#71234 Apr 14, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
Belief is involuntary; nothing involuntary is meritorious or reprehensible. A man ought not to be considered worse or better for his belief.
Percy Bysshe Shelley,
"Declaration of Rights"
"No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says; he is always convinced that it says what he means." ~George Bernard Shaw

It is impossible to exaggerate the evil work theology has done in the world.~Lydia Maria Child

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness".~James K. Galbraith

You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.~Eric Hoffer

"The Bible and the Church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of women's emancipation." ~Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Lincoln

United States

#71235 Apr 14, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
"No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says; he is always convinced that it says what he means." ~George Bernard Shaw
It is impossible to exaggerate the evil work theology has done in the world.~Lydia Maria Child
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness".~James K. Galbraith
You can discover what your enemy fears most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.~Eric Hoffer
"The Bible and the Church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of women's emancipation." ~Elizabeth Cady Stanton
To be is to do - Socrates

To do is to be - Sartre

Do Be Do Be Do - Sinatra

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Imhotep
#71236 Apr 14, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
To be is to do - Socrates
To do is to be - Sartre
Do Be Do Be Do - Sinatra
Imagine there's no heaven; it's easy if you try
No hell below us, above us only sky
Imagine all the people living for today ...
Imagine there's no countries; it isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too
Imagine all the people living life in peace....
~John Lennon (Imagine)

"I don't think we're here for anything, we're just products of evolution. You can say 'Gee, your life must be pretty bleak if you don't think there's a purpose' but I'm anticipating a good lunch." ~James Watson (Discoverer of DNA)

"Whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire." ~Jesus Christ

It should not be believed that all beings exist for the sake of the existence of man. On the contrary, all the other beings too have been intended for their own sakes and not for the sake of something else." ~Maimonides

And what if we picked the wrong religion? Every week, we're just making God madder and madder!~Homer Simpson

God: Thou hast forsaken My Church!
Homer:[in fear] Uh, kind-of... b-but...
God: But what!
Homer: I'm not a bad guy! I work hard, and I love my kids. So why should I spend half my Sunday hearing about how I'm going to Hell?
God:[pause] Hmm... You've got a point there.
~The Simpsons

"Everyone knows the best bands are affiliated with Satan." ~Bart Simpson

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71237 Apr 14, 2013
Atheism is simply disbelief repeated until you believe it.

Judged:

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71238 Apr 14, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
To be is to do - Socrates
To do is to be - Sartre
Do Be Do Be Do - Sinatra
Creationists always talk philosophy when they are cornered by the fact that they have no proof of god and are essentially a cult of liars trying to sell decent people a scam.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
Lincoln

United States

#71239 Apr 14, 2013
"Do You Believe In Magic"

Do you believe in magic?
In a young girls heart
How the music can free her
whenever it starts

And it's magic
if the music is groovy
It makes you feel happy like an old time movie

I'll tell ya about the magic
but it's like trying to tell a stranger 'bout rock n roll

If you believe in magic, don't bother to choose
If it's jug band music or rhythm and blues
Just go and listen
It won't wipe off your face no matter how hard you try
And you can't seem to find
How you got there

If you believe in magic
Come along with me
We'll dance until morning, just you and me
and maybe, if the music is right
I'll meet ya tomorrow
so late at night

We'll go a dancin' baby then you'll see
all the magic's in the music and the music's in me, yeah

Do you belive in magic? Yeah.
Believe in the magic in a young girl's soul
believe in the magic of rock n roll
Believe in the magic that can set you free
Ohhhh, talkin' bout magic

Do you believe like I believe?
Do you believe in magic?

Judged:

2

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71240 Apr 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
"Do You Believe In Magic"
Do you believe in magic?
In a young girls heart
How the music can free her
whenever it starts
And it's magic
if the music is groovy
It makes you feel happy like an old time movie
I'll tell ya about the magic
but it's like trying to tell a stranger 'bout rock n roll
If you believe in magic, don't bother to choose
If it's jug band music or rhythm and blues
Just go and listen
It won't wipe off your face no matter how hard you try
And you can't seem to find
How you got there
If you believe in magic
Come along with me
We'll dance until morning, just you and me
and maybe, if the music is right
I'll meet ya tomorrow
so late at night
We'll go a dancin' baby then you'll see
all the magic's in the music and the music's in me, yeah
Do you belive in magic? Yeah.
Believe in the magic in a young girl's soul
believe in the magic of rock n roll
Believe in the magic that can set you free
Ohhhh, talkin' bout magic
Do you believe like I believe?
Do you believe in magic?
Creationists - always with the lunaticism in the face of direct questions like:

Why can't you address the fact that you have no proof of god, are a bitter theist, making ridiculous potshots in the face of mountains of evidence against your cult.

Judged:

1

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!
John

United States

#71241 Apr 15, 2013
Nothings always shirk accountability in debating the evidence/reasons of their unnamed magic vs the evidences/reasons to believe in a prime mover.

Atheism exposed 101!

Judged:

2

2

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#71242 Apr 15, 2013
John wrote:
Nothings always shirk accountability in debating the evidence/reasons of their unnamed magic vs the evidences/reasons to believe in a prime mover.
Atheism exposed 101!
defeated cult mouthpiece with no proof of god

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#71243 Apr 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
"Do You Believe In Magic"
Do you believe in magic?
In a young girls heart
How the music can free her
whenever it starts
And it's magic
if the music is groovy
It makes you feel happy like an old time movie
I'll tell ya about the magic
but it's like trying to tell a stranger 'bout rock n roll
If you believe in magic, don't bother to choose
If it's jug band music or rhythm and blues
Just go and listen
It won't wipe off your face no matter how hard you try
And you can't seem to find
How you got there
If you believe in magic
Come along with me
We'll dance until morning, just you and me
and maybe, if the music is right
I'll meet ya tomorrow
so late at night
We'll go a dancin' baby then you'll see
all the magic's in the music and the music's in me, yeah
Do you belive in magic? Yeah.
Believe in the magic in a young girl's soul
believe in the magic of rock n roll
Believe in the magic that can set you free
Ohhhh, talkin' bout magic
Do you believe like I believe?
Do you believe in magic?
no. no magic in this world. never one proven instance of magic. not even Bullwinkle pulling a rabbit out of his hat. none. nada. zilch....

Judged:

2

1

1

Report Abuse Judge it!

#### Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.