Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 Full story: TurkishPress.com 70,981

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Full Story
Lincoln

United States

#69375 Mar 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Jewsus-- the fictional MAN you claim to have a deep, personal relationship with on a nightly basis.
What?
You don't like being reminded that your "hero" was a JEW?
Why not?
I don't claim anything.
You do sound

a bit like Hitler.

Hitler wrote the same Quantum-Bot
John

Silex, MO

#69376 Mar 7, 2013
My goodness the lengths you loons will go to avoid an accountable position and defend your hypocrisy is impressive.
Perhaps some history would help you empty. I don't debate nothing. I simply asked some questions starting in 2009 and this forum of antitheists got pissy.
It's obvious this forum is mainly about marginalizing belief. That's the purpose. In response I've offered to debate the evidences and reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any other accountable position of belief. Your game of attack, retreat, attack, retreat, is appararent and I've exposed you.
Your nothing post was longer than most. Next time save yourself some time and skip it. Four years and tens of thousands of postal about a so called nonclaim, nonagenda is really pretty nuts.

Welcome to Stumpville!
John

Silex, MO

#69377 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
I see your forum still has no evidence that meets the standards they hood others accountable to. You claim there is no evidence if a prime mover so prove it. You see folks NOTHING is evidence in this arena to these loons they are simply bigots with an axe to grind. Their sole intent is singular and specific. Marginalize the God they don't believe in.
Now my claim and challenge is there are more reasons and evidences for a prime mover than any other accountable position of belief. I don't debate nothin and only the most gullible fall for your irrationalities. You got something or not. Heck, you can't even make something up.
Evidence is just a word to you loons. I've already exposed you so just make a case or do you feel the urge to incessantly repeat your noncase. It's utterly laughable you have nothing since 2009.
How does an antitheist decide which is the most or least likely of the following: always was, prime mover, something from nothing. Show your work please :)
Antitheists don't do questions or evidence.
Atheists don't do questions.
John

Silex, MO

#69378 Mar 7, 2013
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle ithought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 66,590 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#69379 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheists don't do questions.
Sure we do, you just always run away! your faith is weak and based on proven lies. this is why you run.
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#69380 Mar 7, 2013
Sources?
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't claim anything.
You do sound
a bit like Hitler.
Hitler wrote the same Quantum-Bot
John

Silex, MO

#69381 Mar 7, 2013
Nothing...and you skipped the questions.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69382 Mar 7, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't claim anything.
Lie.

I well remember your very first post to me.

It claimed all sorts of Genuine Christian™ crapola.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69383 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
My goodness the lengths you loons will go to avoid an accountable position and defend your hypocrisy is impressive.
Perhaps some history would help you empty. I don't debate nothing. I simply asked some questions starting in 2009 and this forum of antitheists got pissy.
It's obvious this forum is mainly about marginalizing belief. That's the purpose. In response I've offered to debate the evidences and reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any other accountable position of belief. Your game of attack, retreat, attack, retreat, is appararent and I've exposed you.
Your nothing post was longer than most. Next time save yourself some time and skip it. Four years and tens of thousands of postal about a so called nonclaim, nonagenda is really pretty nuts.
Welcome to Stumpville!
The above?

Is not an argument for your ... ahem .. "prime mover".

Neither is it evidence in support of that silliness.

I get to keep my money-- you are still a coward.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69384 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheists don't do questions.
The above?

Is not an argument for your ... ahem .. "prime mover".

Neither is it evidence in support of that silliness.

I get to keep my money-- you are still a coward.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69385 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
<spam deleted>
The above?

Is not an argument for your ... ahem .. "prime mover".

Neither is it evidence in support of that silliness.

I get to keep my money-- you are still a coward.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69386 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
Nothing...and you skipped the questions.
What "questions"?

You STILL don't even have a simple ARGUMENT for your ... ahem... "prime mover".

Not one single statement from YOU in support of that silliness.

Why?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#69387 Mar 7, 2013
Many claim you can't prove a negative. I disagree. In some cases you can. In cases where there would have to be evidence of something if it were there, lack of that evidence proves it's not there.
If the god of they buy-bull existed, there would be evidence of his existence. But there is no evidence of his existence, so it's only logical to conclude he doesn't exist.
Lincoln

United States

#69388 Mar 7, 2013
John wrote:
Nothing...and you skipped the questions.
Quantum-bot is all knowing

alas He can't spell Jesus :-)

He is a legend in his/her own mind

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#69389 Mar 7, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Quantum-bot is all knowing
alas He can't spell Jesus :-)
He is a legend in his/her own mind
So...still running from your claim that all our presidents were christians?

do you and johnny train together for all your running?
Lincoln

United States

#69390 Mar 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>So...still running from your claim that all our presidents were christians?
do you and johnny train together for all your running?
Not at all

William Howard Taft was a Unitarian. 1905 to 1909

The others professed Christianity, real. imagined or political?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69391 Mar 7, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Quantum-bot is all knowing
alas He can't spell Jesus :-)
He is a legend in his/her own mind
You continue to act in ways that deserve zero respect.

Thanks for playing.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69392 Mar 7, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all
William Howard Taft was a Unitarian. 1905 to 1909
The others professed Christianity, real. imagined or political?
You continue to act in ways that deserve zero respect.

Thanks for playing.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69393 Mar 7, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Many claim you can't prove a negative. I disagree. In some cases you can. In cases where there would have to be evidence of something if it were there, lack of that evidence proves it's not there.
If the god of they buy-bull existed, there would be evidence of his existence. But there is no evidence of his existence, so it's only logical to conclude he doesn't exist.
Yep.

“My hand is over my crotch.”

Since: Jan 10

It's time to put it to use

#69394 Mar 7, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Many claim you can't prove a negative. I disagree. In some cases you can. In cases where there would have to be evidence of something if it were there, lack of that evidence proves it's not there.
If the god of they buy-bull existed, there would be evidence of his existence. But there is no evidence of his existence, so it's only logical to conclude he doesn't exist.
Using their arguments, we will have to conclude the possibility that the Hobgoblins, gremlins, fairies, witches, and wizards exists just because we cannot "prove" they do not exist.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 14 min Brian_G 14,398
A New Kinder, Gentler Atheism 1 hr Thinking 273
Is 'naturalism' a bleak philosophical outlook? ... 1 hr Thinking 37
Richard Dawkins needs to get a life 1 hr Thinking 17
God' existence 1 hr Thinking 152
Can Atheists Know God Does Not Exist When They ... 1 hr Thinking 291
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 1 hr Thinking 2,836
More from around the web