Atheists on the march in America

Atheists on the march in America

There are 70650 comments on the TurkishPress.com story from Aug 26, 2009, titled Atheists on the march in America. In it, TurkishPress.com reports that:

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TurkishPress.com.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69649 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Your nothing is repeatable and observable. Got anything relevant. Of course you don't!
And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.
You are still a coward, without a single argument.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69650 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. ;)
And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69651 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Don't forget to watch the Bible series on the History Channel, ratings are through the roof.!
Why? I've already read that filthy book'o'hate 100's of times through.

I see no reason at all, to pollute my mind with more.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69652 Mar 15, 2013
Thinking wrote:
The UK History Channel doesn't carry that one, mainly because it would have to be renamed the Fiction Channel.
<quoted text>
Yes. Or the hate-channel. Or both...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69653 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Bollocks. You skipped the questions by the way.
Your... ahem... "questions" are not worthy of a response.

And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69654 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Your nothing is showing Rose. I don't debate nothing. The gigs up you are exposed and there are only a few of you whackos left.
Nothing save the Queen!
And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.
John

Silex, MO

#69655 Mar 15, 2013
Why are you arguing with yourself about evolution nutbag?

What is your prerequisites for questions?

Where is your evidence or accountable position you claim to have provided.

Hi my name is Bob and I'm a lying antitheist frightened to debate my nothing vs something.
Thinking

Mirfield, UK

#69656 Mar 15, 2013
Have you noticed that John isn't even bright enough to use reply correctly?

John is a dribbler.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Note to lurkers. I have tried to debate with John, but he refuses to debate. Until he provides *some* evidence for god...
Thinking

Mirfield, UK

#69657 Mar 15, 2013
Horrortard channel?
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Or the hate-channel. Or both...

“I'm out hunting”

Since: Jan 10

For your mind and soul

#69658 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Well thanks for sharing your nothing boys. Thanks for skipping the questions. Thanks for running from my challenge. Thanks for your presuppositions rather than accountable positions.
Fight that God, march, march,.march
I just gave you a response, but you choose to pretend that I did not. Here is my response again. You are correct when you say "We don't know what we don't know." That is why it is wrong for us to pass off legends or myths as fact. But that is exactly what you religious people are doing when ou say that God is real and the buybull is the word of God. You passing off a mere claim as fact. What If I said that the world was created by a Giant Spaghetti monster and his giant noodles? Or supposed I said that the world was created by a magical unicorn with a large dyck and to achieve salvation; humans must rub the dycks of horses? There is as much evidence for those claims as to your buybull being the work of God.

“I'm out hunting”

Since: Jan 10

For your mind and soul

#69659 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. ;)
You are correct when you say "We don't know what we don't know." That is why it is wrong for us to pass off legends or myths as fact. But that is exactly what you religious people are doing when ou say that God is real and the buybull is the word of God. You passing off a mere claim as fact. What If I said that the world was created by a Giant Spaghetti monster and his giant noodles? Or supposed I said that the world was created by a magical unicorn with a large dyck and to achieve salvation; humans must rub the dycks of horses? There is as much evidence for those claims as to your buybull being the work of God.
John

Silex, MO

#69660 Mar 15, 2013
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. ;)

Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69661 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Why are you arguing with yourself about evolution nutbag?
Yes-- you are an evolutionary nutbag. Good. You are learning!

Pity about your ... ahem... "prime mover" which has no supportive arguments of any kind, nor evidence as well.

Bu then again? You love the lie-- it's what you do best, after all.
John wrote:
What is your prerequisites for questions?
None. You haven't asked any that are worthy of replies.

You ASSume that your... "prime mover" is real, without showing even ONE argument that it is LOGICAL, let alone real!

Silly.
John wrote:
Where is your evidence or accountable position you claim to have provided.
I have told you countless times in the past-- I'm so sorry you are incapable of .... reading.

Must be that ... "prime mover" of yours... LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69662 Mar 15, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Horrortard channel?
<quoted text>
That could be it. Or, perhaps the frontal-lobotomy channel? Known elsewhere as the religious channel...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69663 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Absolutely. Right back at ya. Originally I simply asked the forum what they believed and noted that antitheism is in my experience all too often the default. Being a believer is/was irrelevant. I was accurate and antitheists showed their true colors, lashing out against a God they don't believe in and a God I was not attempting to shove down their throats.
Ruling out possibilities is not freethinking. We don't know what we don't know. Attacking/marginalizing belief isn't intellectually honest when nothing meets the repeatable and observable standard. Four years of no evidence in the atheism forum is enough for me to conclude this. I've asked the question hundreds of times and many claim to have provided it, but that's a lie. No sugarcoating it.
The conversation devolved quickly as (the way I see it) their was a group attack effort to bring this God they seem to hate into the equation. This did not dissuade me as I chose to stay on point. I was clear my intentions were not to make any claims, I was an am.simply pointing out intellectual dishonesty.
I continued trying to get the "rules" for evidence after all attempts to get answers to legitiamate questions failed. I sought these rules in response to the neverending attacks to further expose the forum. I offered to debate the evidences/reasons I believe in a prime mover vs any accountable position of belief that meets the criteria I was given. This challenge was not accepted. There will be claims otherwise but I guarrantee you won't find what I've asked. Now imagine doing this dance for four years simply because I refuse to debate nothing. I didn't set out to mock simple disbelief, that fine but this isn't that and I think you know it.
Name a subject I get to ask all the questions on and your job is to defend it, over and over and over and over again. How about science? Get my point? It's even more ridiculous considering I've exposed the standard. Remember my question regarding evidence quantification? Never answered relevantly.
Nonbelievers like yourself leave pretty quickly and they should. You may find it glib but what is the point of a forum about nothing? This is an agenda that stifles true freethought.
A simple I don't know...end forum would have sufficed. Now its a game to me to see how many years this forum will be intellectualy dishonest in their fight for nothing.
I appreciate your consideration but I've done this multiple times with decent folk like yourself. I won't debate in front of the kids without the reasonable prerequisites I've asked for. A simple no to my question should have been the response years ago LOL. Back to cut and paste. ;)
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit.
And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.
John

Silex, MO

#69664 Mar 15, 2013
Your fear of debating your nothing vs my prime mover is noted. It's a shame just writing science, logical, or rational isn't evidence of any kind.

Your forum is four years in repeating nothing. You skipped the question regarding questions. What a coward.
John

Silex, MO

#69665 Mar 15, 2013
Watch the loons fight the God they don't believe in. Something from nothing is a scientific impossibility. Still no evidence or accountable position in an atheism forum.
John

Silex, MO

#69666 Mar 15, 2013
Notice the forum won't submit an accountable position to debate vs mine. They know there are multiple disciplines that provide reasons/evidences in support of same. No rational person thinks something came from nothing. Poof!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69667 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Your fear of debating your nothing vs my prime mover is noted. It's a shame just writing science, logical, or rational isn't evidence of any kind.
Your forum is four years in repeating nothing. You skipped the question regarding questions. What a coward.
The above? Is not an argument in support of your ... ahem... "prime mover".

Neither is it evidence.

And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69668 Mar 15, 2013
John wrote:
Watch the loons fight the God they don't believe in. Something from nothing is a scientific impossibility. Still no evidence or accountable position in an atheism forum.
The above? Is not an argument in support of your ... ahem... "prime mover".

Neither is it evidence.

And yes-- science is repeatable and observable. Which is why evolution is science, and your "prime mover" isn't.

You are still a coward, without a single argument.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) 40 min Brian_G 6,219
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 46 min thetruth 9,394
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 53 min ChristineM 243,391
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 14 hr ChristineM 19,788
News Atheism must be about more than just not believ... 15 hr Amused 2
Should atheists have the burden of proof? 23 hr thetruth 38
News Founders created secular nation (Jul '10) Sat knight of Jesus 521
More from around the web