Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 Read more: TurkishPress.com 70,659

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Read more

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#69458 Mar 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>Courts can determine law, but they can't determine reality.
Atheism isn't a religion. Can you please explain to me what you get out of claiming it is?
Therefore, it cannot be promoted by a public school.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#69459 Mar 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>If you're going to spam, you should at least spam something that's actually intelligent.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch...
John

Silex, MO

#69460 Mar 8, 2013
Sure. Can you please answer the questions your forum has ducked since 2009.

Here is an example. How does an antitheist decide what is most/least likely: prime mover, always was, something from nothing. Show your work.

Get your nothing out of here!
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#69461 Mar 8, 2013
jesus.
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Got it wrong it's Jesus.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#69462 Mar 8, 2013
Note to lurkers, John refuses to step up to the plate. I've presented my accountable position. He won't present any evidence for a god. After he does, I will debate him.
John

Silex, MO

#69463 Mar 8, 2013
Sounds good Rose LOL. You always seem to forget that accountable position of belief though. You have no intention of debating. Heck, you skipped the questions yet again. On and on, year after year....what's wrong with you?

I'll leave the forum immediately if you can show me one piece of relevant evidence in this arena that meets the evidentiary standard you hold others accountable to. The lurkers will be watching closely. You will fail.

Lying for nothing is a strange compulsion with your ilk. Thankfully, most view you as the quacks you are.
John

Silex, MO

#69464 Mar 8, 2013
john wrote:
Unfortunately, many atheists are antitheists. Foreshadowing where this thread will end up I'll ask a simple question. What position are defending? Disbelief is not belief, and mocking religion/God is usually the response to a simple question. Stump an antitheist! Ask him what he believes.
Page one August 7, 2009. You have 60,000 + posts of nothing in response. I'm embarassed for you.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#69465 Mar 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
Note to lurkers, John refuses to step up to the plate. I've presented my accountable position. He won't present any evidence for a god. After he does, I will debate him.
I dare you to show your nice side.

“I'm out hunting”

Since: Jan 10

For your mind and soul

#69466 Mar 8, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Using your inability to quantify evidence we will have to conclude your babbling nonclaims over and over is a sign of mental illness.

You weren't saying?
I am waiting for you to provide evidence for your magical skydad.

“I'm out hunting”

Since: Jan 10

For your mind and soul

#69467 Mar 8, 2013
d-pants wrote:
<quoted text> considering all the genetic evidence that debunks human evolution from other primates, salamanders. And the complete lack of a fossil record too, I would say you have about as much "proof" for hobgoblins as darwinism, god, skuttlebutt, santa clause, whatever.
There is no evidence to debunk evolution and there is fossil evidence to prove it.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69468 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like the courts don't agree with you. LOL
Atheist lose again!
John Calvert, a lawyer and intelligent designproponent declared:
The Seventh Judicial Circuit of the Court of Appeals of the United States held that atheism is a religion. Therefore, it cannot be promoted by a public school. Currently, public schools are often unwittingly promoting atheism through a dogmatic and uncritical teaching of materialistic theories of origins.
Let's tell the WHOLE story, shall we?

The CONTEXT is EVERYTHING: evil dickheads like you, had FORCED prisoners to comply with your evil religious practice, by giving special meeting-priveledges to True Believers™ only.

An atheist sued the prison officials for equal treatment-- and won.

So the court considers a nice tidy LEGAL FICTION, that atheism was "religion" in order to treat prisoners who were NOT True Believers™ with equality as required by the law.

You DO know what a LEGAL FICTION is don't you?

Here's another one: corporations.

The LEGAL FICTION is that these are a person, granted certain rights under the law.

Of course, everyone knows corporations are NOT a person, but are a business comprised of buildings, property, assets, etc-- but not REALLY a person. That is a convenient LEGAL FICTION.

Just as calling "atheism" a "religion" is.

Are you REALLY this stupid, or did you need special stupid lessons?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69469 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
John Calvert, a lawyer and intelligent designproponent declared:
John Calvert is a horses' azz, no two ways about THAT.

Being a proponent of the extremely IDIOTIC idea of "intelligent design", he could be nothing less.

Only a complete idiot would advocate "intelligent design".

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69470 Mar 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Therefore, it cannot be promoted by a public school.
It isn't.

Atheism simply happens to correspond with...

.... reality.

Public schools are required to teach reality.

Coincidence?

Nope-- rationalism and atheism go hand-in-glove.

In direct contrast to religion-- which is just stupid.

As are you....

... coincidence?

Nope-- stupid and religion also go hand-in-glove.

Proof? Your Calvert idiot comes immediately to mind...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69471 Mar 8, 2013
John wrote:
Sure. Can you please answer the questions your forum has ducked since 2009.
No.

Not until you give us ONE (1) argument in support of "prime mover".

You first, godbot.

You first-- you came HERE uninvited after all.
Lincoln

United States

#69472 Mar 9, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
It isn't.
Atheism simply happens to correspond with...
.... reality.
Public schools are required to teach reality.
Coincidence?
Guess again...
you seem unhappy
Lincoln

United States

#69473 Mar 9, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's tell the WHOLE story, shall we?
The CONTEXT is EVERYTHING: evil dickheads like you, had FORCED prisoners to comply with your evil religious practice, by giving special meeting-priveledges to True Believers™ only.
An atheist sued the prison officials for equal treatment-- and won.
So the court considers a nice tidy LEGAL FICTION, that atheism was "religion" in order to treat prisoners who were NOT True Believers™ with equality as required by the law.
You DO know what a LEGAL FICTION is don't you?
Here's another one: corporations.
The LEGAL FICTION is that these are a person, granted certain rights under the law.
Of course, everyone knows corporations are NOT a person, but are a business comprised of buildings, property, assets, etc-- but not REALLY a person. That is a convenient LEGAL FICTION.
Just as calling "atheism" a "religion" is.
Are you REALLY this stupid, or did you need special stupid lessons?
Pope Quantum IV

Document the above statements if you wish.

or are able.:-)

Calling people names indicates your unhappiness
Lincoln

United States

#69474 Mar 9, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
John Calvert is a horses' azz, no two ways about THAT.
Being a proponent of the extremely IDIOTIC idea of "intelligent design", he could be nothing less.
Only a complete idiot would advocate "intelligent design".
Calling people names indicates your failures :-)
John

Silex, MO

#69475 Mar 9, 2013
You loons skipped the questions. When will you have evidence for your anti-science something from nothing?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#69476 Mar 9, 2013
John wrote:
You loons skipped the questions. When will you have evidence for your anti-science something from nothing?
\

Your "questions" were unworthy of a reasoned response.

They weren't so much "questions" as they were rants on your part.

So naturally they were simply ignored as propaganda.

You, on the other hand?

YOU have NO arguments AT ALL for your... ahem... "prime mover".

Not even ONE claim in support of your silly idea.

Why?
John

Silex, MO

#69477 Mar 9, 2013
Your nothing is showing Bob. I offered you a challenge. You cowered.

What are your prerequisites for questions? You skipped that question as well.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 min Aerobatty 237,705
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 4 min James 7,399
News Confessions of a black atheist 7 min Samoan Irish 316
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 17 min James 18,461
News Atheists open up: What they want you to know 31 min James 19
The Ultimate Evidence of God (Mar '14) 1 hr James 149
News Barney Frank Advises Politicians to Stay in the... 2 hr Lib Hater 15
More from around the web