Atheists on the march in America

Atheists on the march in America

There are 70645 comments on the TurkishPress.com story from Aug 26, 2009, titled Atheists on the march in America. In it, TurkishPress.com reports that:

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TurkishPress.com.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#68865 Feb 28, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Well, they don't get to burn so many witches these days, do they?
<quoted text>
that was the family get-together of the times for christians wasn't it? now that the gays are off limits, who do you think they'll go after next?
John

United States

#68866 Feb 28, 2013
sickofit wrote:
John...I am In Albert Lea Minnesota......MEET YOU AT TRAILS TRUCK STOP....Look for a guy who is 6ft4in 265lbs and wearing Harley shirts always..
Then walk up to me and say one stupid thing and I will break you.
Get a new shirt pillowbiter. I love calling bullies out. Go back a few years to other threats from cowards. You guys never show. Let me give you a tip, a guy who has fought and instructed most of his life is going to laugh at you. I will probably just extend your arm make you scream to the God you don't believe in and let go. I want to humiliate you not hurt you. You aren't coming though ate you?

Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe.
John

United States

#68867 Feb 28, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>that was the family get-together of the times for christians wasn't it? now that the gays are off limits, who do you think they'll go after next?
I couldn't hear you over the screams of millions slaughtered by atheistic regimes. Great point about a few witches though.

You skipped the questions while desperately reaching.

No evidence or accountable position in the atheism forum.
John

United States

#68868 Feb 28, 2013
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 66,100 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#68869 Feb 28, 2013
Do they realise the gays are off limits yet?

I don't know who gets it next though, there is still so much prejudice, as Tim Minchin will attest.

www.youtube.com/watch...
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>that was the family get-together of the times for christians wasn't it? now that the gays are off limits, who do you think they'll go after next?
Thinking

Gillingham, UK

#68870 Feb 28, 2013
Bollocks.
John wrote:
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 66,100 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68871 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
Still no evidence...
... for or of your god or your "prime mover".

NEXT!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68872 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
You make the presupposition ...
... that there are no gods.

Good!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68873 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
Not only .. not have any evidence ...
Yes. We KNOW you do not have any evidence.

NEXT!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68874 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
Still evidence free though.
Yes-- you are still evidence free.

Good!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68875 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
It isn't hard ... my beliefs ... impossible nonsense.
Yes. Yes your beliefs are impossible nonsense.

Good of you to admit this!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68876 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
... I'll point ... exposed ... myself.
Please. If you did? Everyone would need a microscope to see.

Not than anyone would wish to, mind-- a shrived little thing it'd be, there is no doubt.

LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68877 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
My accountable position is a prime mover.
Prove it.

Give it your BEST SHOT-- where is your EVIDENCE for this ... ahem... "prime mover".

Hmmmm?

Or?

Will you run away and hide, as always?

LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68878 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
PUNK, DOG KILLING RAPIST you are all words. Typical of a cowardly atheist. Attempt to marginalize and bully those who disagree with you. You will do neither little fella. Not from your keyboard and certainly not in person.
Too over the top LOL? I'm new at this.
This post? This post of yours?

Not a debate. Not evidence of any kind.

I get to keep my money. And you?

You are the coward-- exactly as I predicted.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68879 Feb 28, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
My theory holds firm until science proves it incorrect.
What theory? That you are batsh9t insane?

We already knew that, silly boyo!

LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68880 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
Ok, Sicko would love to debate but has nothing of his own to debate.
I already challenged you to a debate:

You begin.

Show us your FACT, your EVIDENCE for your ... ahem... "prime mover".

That's right-- YOU HAVE NONE!

You don't even have a SUPPOSITION!

LOL!

You are such a dimwit.
John

United States

#68881 Feb 28, 2013
You skipped the questions or an accountable position Bob. This is your forum and you most certainly won't decide what is and isn't evidence. I've already exposed you have no clue there.

I'll give you credit for realizing a prime mover is the most evidence based case. It's why most great thinkers have come to that conclusion and why you rum from debating it.

Happy to see your nothing over and over and over again though.

What do you believe Bob?

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#68882 Feb 28, 2013
For those who don't know, John is just a troll who will not debate. I have stated my accountable position many times, he won't deal with it. He won't provide any evidence for god. Is anybody out there willing to do that? Willing to debate?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68883 Feb 28, 2013
John wrote:
You skipped...
I already challenged you to a debate:

You begin.

Show us your FACT, your EVIDENCE for your ... ahem... "prime mover".

That's right-- YOU HAVE NONE!

You don't even have a SUPPOSITION!

LOL!

You are such a dimwit.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#68884 Feb 28, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
For those who don't know, John is just a troll who will not debate. I have stated my accountable position many times, he won't deal with it. He won't provide any evidence for god. Is anybody out there willing to do that? Willing to debate?
Yep.

John is a coward, through and through.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 33 min candlesmell 94,132
a prayer of salvation for those who are willing (Oct '17) 6 hr blacklagoon 3 134
News Egyptian Parliament considers outlawing atheism May 15 dollarsbill 5
Stephen Hawking, now a believer May 8 superwilly 20
The atheists trick May 8 Eagle 12 - 3
News The Anti-Christian Movement May 7 blacklagoon 3 25
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) May 5 Eagle 12 - 5,971