Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 Full story: TurkishPress.com 70,980

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Full Story
sickofit

Faribault, MN

#68214 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you can't answer the questions...that makes YOU stupid. Based on your incoherent responses, I'm guessing you never'gra-gee-ated" third grade.
WHAT?????????? I graduated with honors and hold two masters. One in business management and one in computer programing.

HOW DID HOMESCHOOLING GO FOR YOU?????????? Didnt have sex with teacher did you??? LOL LOSER.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#68215 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
What parts?
Two gentically identical people populating the planet. proven impossible. the great flood. proven to not have happened. the few survivors of this lied about flood re-populating a planet, not possible.

needd others?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68216 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
If you can believe without evidence that nothing caused SOMETHING to form the universe, you cannot find fault with the Christian who believes God created the universe without scientific evidence. To do so, is to be completely irrational.
Fundie, have you ever even wondered what it would be like to take a science class? There is evidence for the big bang. Evidence for evolution. There will always be questions science doesn't have the answer to. That's no reason to believe "Zap! God did it!". Especially when there is no evidence at all that god exists, and the myth fundies believe is clearly absurd.
John

East Saint Louis, IL

#68217 Feb 13, 2013
Another round of matching for nothing. Sad.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#68218 Feb 13, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, let's say, for the sake of argument, I'm not interested in knowing the answers. So what? That doesn't make the story in Genesis any more plausible.
<quoted text>
No, you stupid fundie. Evidence.
The creation myth has day and night before there is a sun, also, plants growing. I don't know all the details of how the universe began, but I do know day and night are caused by a spot the earth rotating towards and away from the sun. And that plants can't survive without the sun. That's not just my opinion.
I know all about the inconsistencies in the Bible, but what makes you assume that Genesis is the ONLY version of creation, lamebrain?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68219 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidence? Science can't tell you what caused that singular...that SOMETHING to expand suddenly. It can't tell you where it came from.
So what? That doesn't change the fact that the creation myth is Genesis is a myth.
BBSting wrote:
Again, what evidence? There is no scientific evidence that explains what "caused" dead matter to spring to life so that it could begin to evolve into forms.
That doesn't change the fact that plants need the sun to survive, but the myth in Genesis has them growing before there is a sun. So, we can dismiss that story, and search for the real explanation.
BBSting wrote:
Science has no evidence regarding the origin of the universe or the origin of life on earth and yet you believe it does. You have as much "faith" in science, then, as the religious have in God.
That's not true! Pul-eeeeeze take a basic science class!
The red shift is evidence of the big bang.
sickofit

Faribault, MN

#68220 Feb 13, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>you do realize Einstein was wrong about that, don't you?!?!?
Neils Bohr was correct, Eoinstein was wrong.
you are too freakin' funny! and stupid...
C'mon, talk about shit you clearly don't understand some more, this is great material.....
At his homeschool they only used the bible for education and he had sex with the teacher to pass each grade....SOOOOO STUPID...
John

East Saint Louis, IL

#68221 Feb 13, 2013
These loons are so smart they know their rules for evidence are valid despite nothing making the cut LOL. Most people who look find the evidence/signs point to a promenade mover. It's really the only case that can be made substantiively. No wonder these frauds refuse to put.their nothing up against my something.

Nothing Bless
sickofit

Faribault, MN

#68222 Feb 13, 2013
John wrote:
Another round of matching for nothing. Sad.
Why do we educated evolutionist have to prove our belief. But you religous FREAKS dont have one bit of proof and say you dont need to.....HOWS THAT WORK MORON???????

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#68223 Feb 13, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
WHAT?????????? I graduated with honors and hold two masters. One in business management and one in computer programing.
HOW DID HOMESCHOOLING GO FOR YOU?????????? Didnt have sex with teacher did you??? LOL LOSER.
I find it amusing how everytime someone challenges the educational level of an atheist, he suddenly morphs into a PhD with a boatload of degrees. LMAO! Who do you think you're kidding, fartknocker? My seven year old can construct more coherent sentences than you can!
John

East Saint Louis, IL

#68224 Feb 13, 2013
John wrote:
Antitheists have no real way to measure evidence. Using their own standards has gotten them zero evidence. I've asked this many times before. It is ignored by the stumpees.
How does a nothing decide which is most or least likely: something from nothing, always was, prime mover. Show your work loons and make sure it adheres to your limiting paramaters.
Now rather than get bogged down in quibbling over whaet the standard for evidence is. Which is generous of me considering the hypocrisy of you bigots. I've suggested you make the case for your nothing and I'll make the case for my something. It's your forum and you can't even feign substance. The arguments for a prime mover scare you to death.
That's ok, I enjoy exposing your quackery.
Atheists don't do evidence or questions. They do vote Obama. Evidence isn't important. Agenda is. Whack dack a doodle.
John

East Saint Louis, IL

#68225 Feb 13, 2013
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 65,480 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68226 Feb 13, 2013
John wrote:
Lmao!!!! Antitheists need some science lessons. Antitheists need some logic lessons. Antitheists need some evidence that meets their own criteria. I need more string for my marionettes LOL.
Absolutely no evidence or accountable position since 2009. That's 65,000 posts and years spent trying to steer the narrative to others making a case for a God they don't believe in. Your illogical nothing cannot be hidden.
I believe a prime mover is th most plausible explanation for origin and will debate that vs whatever these viewed refuse to defend. Nothing is of course what they have. I am perfectly comfortable knowing they purposefully avoid the evidences of many disciplines of a prime mover. Of course nothing is evidence to these folks, but they bring their insanities and hate online for all to see. I enjoy exposing this farce.
Note to lurkers:
John is just flat out lying.
Many atheists have presented evidence and accountable positions.
I have.
But John refuses to debate.
He just copy/pastes the same few posts again and again.
John is a liar.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#68227 Feb 13, 2013
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do we educated evolutionist have to prove our belief. But you religous FREAKS dont have one bit of proof and say you dont need to.....HOWS THAT WORK MORON???????
Omnipotence doesn't have to explain itself. Since science is your source of truth and science verifies all its claims with evidence, then you have to provide the evidence to back up your claims.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#68228 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it amusing how everytime someone challenges the educational level of an atheist, he suddenly morphs into a PhD with a boatload of degrees. LMAO! Who do you think you're kidding, fartknocker? My seven year old can construct more coherent sentences than you can!
Tell us some more about eisntein and his 'god doesn't play dice..." idea...then we'll talk about education...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68229 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
If You and science cannot answer these questions...then you cannot claim that religion's answers are invalid.
Of course I can! The buy-bull indicates the earth is flat! I don't need to know all the details of how the universe began to know the earth isn't flat. And since the earth isn't flat, I can dismiss the buy-bull as the inerrant word of god.
hot topics

Rushville, IN

#68230 Feb 13, 2013
Proud atheist here

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#68231 Feb 13, 2013
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheists don't do evidence or questions. They do vote Obama. Evidence isn't important. Agenda is. Whack dack a doodle.
i give you evidence all the time, i answer your questions. i never voted for obama.

any thing else you want to lie about?

What i can honestly point out is that it seems to be the religious people on this site that lie time and time again. Openly. why is that?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#68232 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are going to assert that "there is no reason to even entertain the idea" that God exists, then you must provide more than opinion to substantiate your position.
Not true. Unless there is evidence for god, there is no reason to believe he exists. Pretty simple, really.

Since: Mar 11

Minnesota's North Coast

#68233 Feb 13, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
Omnipotence doesn't have to explain itself. Since science is your source of truth and science verifies all its claims with evidence, then you have to provide the evidence to back up your claims.
omnipotence? you'd think that god would have known that the Earth circled the sun...hmmm, did that god go to the same school you did?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr Joe fortuna 234,525
Christianity Created Hitler 2 hr Uncle Sam 123
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 5 hr The Dude 14,504
Our world came from nothing? (Jul '14) 7 hr The_Box 1,230
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 12 hr woodtick57 2,838
Richard Dawkins needs to get a life 18 hr Thinking 22
Is 'naturalism' a bleak philosophical outlook? ... Sun polymath257 41
More from around the web