Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: TurkishPress.com

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Comments (Page 3,242)

Showing posts 64,821 - 64,840 of70,959
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Thinking

Newbury, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67574
Feb 4, 2013
 
OK, you believe a donkey rode a dinosaur. So what?
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
So you believe a donkey is a dinosaur?
What a Dolt!

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67575
Feb 4, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
So you believe a donkey is a dinosaur?
What a Dolt!
If dinosaurs didn't exist in your 6,000 years, then why do we have the fossils?
John

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67576
Feb 4, 2013
 
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 64,840 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67577
Feb 4, 2013
 
John wrote:
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence ....
It's not a presupposition so long as you continue to present none, it is fact.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67578
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>If dinosaurs didn't exist in your 6,000 years, then why do we have the fossils?
LOL

It's always a good time reading you comments. Thanks.
Thinking

Newbury, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67579
Feb 4, 2013
 
You posted this same sh!t before, back when your ISP appeared to be in Florissant, MO
John wrote:
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 64,840 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67580
Feb 4, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
You are of the authority to lay down rules that God must follow?
Debate? What this crap? LOL
How Daftly!
IOW, you can't counter my argument.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67581
Feb 4, 2013
 
John wrote:
Of course this has no evidentiary relevance. My goodness you bigots are hateful. You don't give a damn about evidence.
Nothing again from the illogical, irrational, marchers for nothing.
Provide some evidence of god's existence, and we'll get started.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67582
Feb 4, 2013
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
So he was basically using the argument from authority logical fallacy.
<quoted text>
Yes, but I doubt he's aware if it. To have awareness of such, one needs to be sentient.

He does not qualify.

:D

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67583
Feb 4, 2013
 
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
As soon as he presents ANY evidence for god, I'm willing to debate him.
Until then...
\

Oh, any number of non-godbots have offered. On the first day he posted, I answered ALL of his inane questions.

I foolishly believed he was sincere, and an actual human being.

Now, my working hypothesis is that he's severely brain-damaged to the point of non-sentience. In an institution somewhere or other, or perhaps just a collection of computer code.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67584
Feb 4, 2013
 
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>\
Oh, any number of non-godbots have offered. On the first day he posted, I answered ALL of his inane questions.
I foolishly believed he was sincere, and an actual human being.
Now, my working hypothesis is that he's severely brain-damaged to the point of non-sentience. In an institution somewhere or other, or perhaps just a collection of computer code.
Could be! But he doesn't seem complex and sophisticated enough to be a collection of computer code.
John

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67585
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lots of claims from the loons. Still no evidence that meets their own criteria. No accountable position. No intellectual honesty. Just hate for a God they don't believe in. Sad, really.

March,.march, march, march, 4 nothing!
John

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67586
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Provide some evidence of your nothing. If you loons had an ounce of self respect you would have let this forum about nothing die long ago. I don't mind exposing you and making you dance like puppets though. Don't carry on. As you weren't.

Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67587
Feb 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

They are taught to be sheeplike. Herd mentality waiting to be sheared. Look in their eyes and see a programmed drone.

When you look at us from early tribal people to today you can see we are hunters. Clever, resourceful, doing what we need to do for us and our tribe to survive and progress.

Let them be sheep my friend, we'll be hunters :)
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but I doubt he's aware if it. To have awareness of such, one needs to be sentient.
He does not qualify.
:D
John

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67588
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hunt for some evidence that meets the evidentiary standard you hold others to. It just annoys you to know end that man is not the pinnacle of existence LOL. The false hybris you attempt is comical. The great anti 2nd amendment, bigot hunter. You couldn't catch a cold.

Still no evidence or accountable position in an atheism forum. Mine is a prime mover btw.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67589
Feb 5, 2013
 
John wrote:
Hunt for some evidence that meets the evidentiary standard you hold others to. It just annoys you to know end that man is not the pinnacle of existence LOL. The false hybris you attempt is comical. The great anti 2nd amendment, bigot hunter. You couldn't catch a cold.
Still no evidence or accountable position in an atheism forum. Mine is a prime mover btw.
Nope, that isn't proof of god either, you can stop lying now. After thousands of years, you shouldn't be surprised that your cult is shrinking.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67590
Feb 5, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL
It's always a good time reading you comments. Thanks.
Look how quiet the creationists get when they're confronted with the reality that fossils bust their 6000 year old creationist lie wide open for all to see how crazy it actually is.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67591
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>IOW, you can't counter my argument.
LOL !!

Been doing any LDS lately?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67592
Feb 5, 2013
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL !!
Been doing any LDS lately?
A pity they don't teach you how to spell properly at your local creationist brainwashing center.
Thinking

Charlton Mackrell, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67593
Feb 5, 2013
 
What is your issue with mormons?
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL !!
Been doing any LDS lately?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 64,821 - 64,840 of70,959
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

9 Users are viewing the Atheism Forum right now

Search the Atheism Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
The numbers are in: America still distrusts ath... 22 min Buck Crick 7
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 51 min Patrick 21,376
Our world came from nothing? 1 hr Buck Crick 175
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr Buck Crick 224,012
20+ Questions for Theists (Apr '13) 3 hr Buck Crick 356
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 4 hr Thinking 831
Atheism Destroyed At Last! - The Debate Of The ... 7 hr Patrick 1,285
•••
•••