John, you're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? Atheism is a disbelief in god. Period. Being an Atheist doesn't obligate me to explain the origins of life, the universe and everything.More claims of an accountable position of belief but no evidence. You don't believe in God Rose, don't rely on him for a nonposition.
Again, you show you are rather dumb.If Rose had a conscience there would be evidence of one.
There is no evidence Rose had a conscience.
Rose has no conscience.
Fight that God, march, march, fight!
Let's compare your "argument" to mine.
1. If god exists, there is evidence of his existence.
2. There is no evidence of god's existence.
3. There is no god.
Let's compare the first statements.
My statement 1 makes sense because god is supposed to be all knowing, all powerful and involved in our lives through prayer. If he existed there would be evidence of his existence.(I can't even get you to debate that point...)
I'm none of those things, so your statement 1 makes no sense. I could have a conscience, yet there be no evidence of one. Strike one.
Now, our second statements. There is no evidence of a god. Prove me wrong, provide some.::::crickets chirping:::: And there is evidence I have a conscience, this post. Strike two.
Third statements. Both your statements 1 and 2 are false, so it follows that your statement 3 is false. Both my statements 1 and 2 are true, so, my statement 3 is true. Strike three.