Simply put you are out of your league, when you are able to man up and debate properly without incorporating logical fallacies let us know.
Until then you are just another peon for Christ.
Since one must begin with a bias in an argument(proof), and I defined my bias, you assume it is fallacious....You may assume it is correct or incorrect. But you are assuming.
This means we cannot engage in a debate....You are saying to me, I cannot have a bias and a definition of that bias.
In doing this you logically argue that one cannot argue logically.
You have reduced our possibility for a proof to a fallacy.
You have made the question become absurd.
The fallcy is your argument from ignorance.
In other words, you prefer not to explore and to know, you remain in ignorance.