Atheists on the march in America

Aug 26, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: TurkishPress.com

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Comments
63,161 - 63,180 of 70,985 Comments Last updated Tuesday Aug 5
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65856
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Media vita in morte sumus - in the midst of life, we are in death.

You are alive right now, sparkling with awareness among dead and dying cells. If this process did not occur, if cells were not replaced, you could not maintain your physical image. Not one portion of your physical body is the same as it was ten years ago. That body is dead and yet you don't feel dead.

Consciousness pulses on and off like a firefly. One minute you are consciously present, the next minute you are a space cadet. We've all been there, waiting at a stop light our mind focused somewhere else until the honk of horn brings us back to reality. Consciousness at that moment is unalive or "dead" to the linear way of thinking. The next instant it's alive again, focused in reality though we remain unaware of these subtle fluctuations for the most part. What we call death is the insertion of a longer duration of the natural pulsation of consciousness, a long pause focused in another dimension.

Most people want answers to the same questions regarding death. What will happen when I'm no longer "physically" alive? Will I still feel? Will I still be myself? Will the emotions that propelled me in life continue to do so after death? When I am dead will I remember those who are dear to me now? Yes, yes, yes and yes. All the things that make you uniquely YOU survive death, they are part of your package of consciousness.

The events immediately surrounding each death are as individual as the minds that create them. An actual physical death can range from a long lingering affair, to a coma, to a sudden cataclysmic event caterpaulting one into the next dimension completely unaware of his own demise, but your identity is never extinquished. Your consciousness (awareized energy) does not disappear like a puff of smoke. You do not disperse into particles and become part of a star. Your individual identify survives death intact. It is immortal. There is no place or time where your identity ends. While your physical body will not accompany you during a long pulsation of consciousness focused in another reality, you take everything you've learned, memories, feelings and knowledge with you. Again, these things are part of your package of consciousness.

Is there a heaven and hell? That depends on what you expect to encounter after death, and what you encounter depends on the beliefs you hold as true during physical life. If you believe you must be punished for your sins, you will encounter Hades-like conditions. If you believe you've earned a place at the right hand side of the biblical god, you will encounter heavenly conditions. If you believe there is no life after death, you will encounter a state of limbo, the most detrimental state of all for such a belief will delay your ability to learn how to operate in a new environment in which different laws apply. Those who understand thoroughly that reality is self-created will have least difficulty. Such illusions are only temporary. Consciousness must use its abilities, it strives to know. The boredom and stagnation of a heaven world will not for long content the ever seeking consciousness. One may remain in this heavenly illusion longer than those who find themselves immersed in the searing heat of their own created hell fires however. LOL!
Thinking

Andover, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65857
Dec 13, 2012
 
Not always.

news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20007555-1.html
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe I brought this up already. What goes up doesn't necessarily come down. Space exploration probes do not return. The point being - the scientific method is not infallible. Not everything can be settled according to its canons.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65858
Dec 13, 2012
 
You guys remember when that other idiot from New Jersey was puking out all that out of body experience, NDE's, microwave ghosts and all sorts of other goofy conspiracy theories?

Lmfao! What an idiot!
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality is what we take to be true.
What we take to be true is what we believe.
What we believe is based upon our perceptions.
What we perceive depends upon what we look for.
What we look for depends upon what we think.
What we think depends upon what we perceive.
What we perceive determines what we believe.
What we believe determines what we take to be true.
What we take to be true is our reality.
Be an atheist - that's your choice. Legitimize your decision with science - that's also your choice. But if you are truly interested in expanding your version of reality, the only way to start is by considering other points of view - other perceptions.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65859
Dec 13, 2012
 
Givemeliberty wrote:
You guys remember when that other idiot from New Jersey was puking out all that out of body experience, NDE's, microwave ghosts and all sorts of other goofy conspiracy theories?
Lmfao! What an idiot!
<quoted text>
You're the reason man has a middle finger.
Thinking

Andover, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65860
Dec 13, 2012
 
So you believe, like me, that the middle finger wasn't down to your god, then.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the reason man has a middle finger.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65861
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe I brought this up already. What goes up doesn't necessarily come down. Space exploration probes do not return. The point being - the scientific method is not infallible. Not everything can be settled according to its canons.
Huh? Are you thinking that the non-return somehow violates the law of gravity? In fact, we 8use* the law of gravity deduced via science to know where and how to send the probes where we want.
Thinking

Andover, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65862
Dec 13, 2012
 
And this is the mathematician that first worked out how to do gravity assist in 1961.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Minovitch

To create the tool to plan the Voyager courses was brilliance personified.
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? Are you thinking that the non-return somehow violates the law of gravity? In fact, we 8use* the law of gravity deduced via science to know where and how to send the probes where we want.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65863
Dec 13, 2012
 
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a! I thought that was you! Seen any old lady ghosts around your microwave lately?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a!
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the reason man has a middle finger.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65864
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality is what we take to be true.
What we take to be true is what we believe.
What we believe is based upon our perceptions.
What we perceive depends upon what we look for.
What we look for depends upon what we think.
What we think depends upon what we perceive.
What we perceive determines what we believe.
What we believe determines what we take to be true.
What we take to be true is our reality.
Essentially all of these statements are fundamentally wrong. How do I know? We can be surprised. In fact, there have been many times in the history of science qwhere the prevailing view was that an experiment would go one way and it, in fact, went the other. In fact, this is exactly how science is done: we actually look at the real world and let that determine what we regard as true or false. And often the real world simply doesn't agree with our intuitions.
Be an atheist - that's your choice. Legitimize your decision with science - that's also your choice. But if you are truly interested in expanding your version of reality, the only way to start is by considering other points of view - other perceptions.
I am interested in the truth. If that means I should 'expand my version of reality, then I will'. But that is done when the *evidence* says so, not when I get warm fuzzies from an idea.

It may surprise you that at one time I had 6 different 'systems of reality' that I looked at everything through. They ranged from solipsism to an intricate one where there were seven layers of spiritual reality. Eventually I realized that without basing my system on evidence, it was all essentiually mental masturbation. Maybe, eventually, you will realize that also.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65865
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Essentially all of these statements are fundamentally wrong. How do I know? We can be surprised. In fact, there have been many times in the history of science qwhere the prevailing view was that an experiment would go one way and it, in fact, went the other. In fact, this is exactly how science is done: we actually look at the real world and let that determine what we regard as true or false. And often the real world simply doesn't agree with our intuitions.
<quoted text>
I am interested in the truth. If that means I should 'expand my version of reality, then I will'. But that is done when the *evidence* says so, not when I get warm fuzzies from an idea.
It may surprise you that at one time I had 6 different 'systems of reality' that I looked at everything through. They ranged from solipsism to an intricate one where there were seven layers of spiritual reality. Eventually I realized that without basing my system on evidence, it was all essentiually mental masturbation. Maybe, eventually, you will realize that also.
Perhaps you will realize that the real world is an illusion. A camouflage - a manifestation of the greater reality within it. The physical senses are attuned to perceive only the illusion. To sense the greater reality within requires a different sort of attention, and more delicate manipulations than the physical senses provide.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65866
Dec 13, 2012
 
postscriptt wrote:
Perhaps you will realize that the real world is an illusion. A camouflage - a manifestation of the greater reality within it.
What evidence do you have for a "greater reality"?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65867
Dec 13, 2012
 
The old last microwave ghost told him :))
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidence do you have for a "greater reality"?
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65868
Dec 13, 2012
 
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidence do you have for a "greater reality"?
The evidence you expect must be experienced.

You are like one of many people living in New York city for years who never take a tour of the Empire State Building. YOu have a physical address, but you ignore what is essentially a strange and miraculous psychic and psychological structure within you own system of reality. Take the tour.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65869
Dec 13, 2012
 
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you will realize that the real world is an illusion. A camouflage - a manifestation of the greater reality within it. The physical senses are attuned to perceive only the illusion. To sense the greater reality within requires a different sort of attention, and more delicate manipulations than the physical senses provide.
Yes, I am familiar with that viewpoint also. I even saw it as plausible for a while. Then I realized I was just playing with myself.
John

Kansas City, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65870
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
What evidences are those?
You haven't identified any yet.
When you are done going on and on and on about your nothing let me know. It's impossible to debate your illogical nothing and I know you have no intention of attempting to.

Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65871
Dec 13, 2012
 
What evidence do you have for a "greater reality"?
postscriptt wrote:
The evidence you expect must be experienced.
So you admit that there is zero *objective* evidence for a "greater reality"?

How exactly do you distinguish between your *subjective* evidence and a vivid imagination?
postscriptt wrote:
You are like one of many people living in New York city for years who never take a tour of the Empire State Building.
There are videos and photos of the Empire State Building. Objective evidence.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65872
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
You are barking up the wrong tree. None of the above has anything to do with altered states of consciousness. Mediumship is a fascinating and provocative subject for it touches upon essential questions about the human mind. A medium, or a sensitive can enter voluntarily into one of these states without the use of surgery or drugs, and can at the same time maintain a communication line to the external world.
Still hitting that metaphysical bong, I see. "Mediums" in the form of psychic phenomena? I know a bit about. They aren't real, and yes, it's all a scam.

"Altered states of consciousness," you mean getting high, that's fully explainable in neurology.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65873
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
The evidence you expect must be experienced.
You are like one of many people living in New York city for years who never take a tour of the Empire State Building. YOu have a physical address, but you ignore what is essentially a strange and miraculous psychic and psychological structure within you own system of reality. Take the tour.
Yes, we know of the scams already, we just aren't stupid enough to buy them.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65874
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I am familiar with that viewpoint also. I even saw it as plausible for a while. Then I realized I was just playing with myself.
It takes practice and diligence to develop the skills necessary to venture inward. I can see why you adopted scientific dogma instead. It's easier to have someone tell you what to believe.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65875
Dec 13, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, we know of the scams already, we just aren't stupid enough to buy them.
But you are stupid enough to be unwitting hypocrites. Conventional science arose out of a religious world filled with "witchcraft". It began as a protection from, and a defense against some of the mysteries of the natural world. It has since found itself denying the realities it was designed to tame. It worships skepticism, until skepticism is applied to its hypotheses, procedures, or methods, that is. Hypocrisy.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••