Atheists on the march in America

Atheists on the march in America

There are 70650 comments on the TurkishPress.com story from Aug 26, 2009, titled Atheists on the march in America. In it, TurkishPress.com reports that:

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TurkishPress.com.

postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65702 Dec 9, 2012
Some Random Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Our out-of-control population expansion and our subjugation of the rest of the animal kingdom is based squarely on the religiously propagated myth that the world was created for man and it's man's duty to conquer and rule it.
You are confusing good stewardship with domination. "Be fruitful and mulitiply, and replenish the earth."

It is precisely the scientific idea that we are no more than resilient machines that fosters a lack of caring and compassion. Instead this egregious notion has proven to generate destructive behavior to self and others. One cannot say that science has not advanced civilization however, for we now know how to kill each other more efficiently.
Thinking

UK

#65703 Dec 9, 2012
Do you kill witches? If not, you ignore your bible.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
And you? What's your moral guide, science?
Thinking

UK

#65704 Dec 9, 2012
Evolution.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
If science is not responsible for compassion, where does it come from?
Some Random Dude

Santa Cruz, CA

#65705 Dec 9, 2012
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
You are confusing good stewardship with domination. "Be fruitful and mulitiply, and replenish the earth."
It is precisely the scientific idea that we are no more than resilient machines that fosters a lack of caring and compassion. Instead this egregious notion has proven to generate destructive behavior to self and others. One cannot say that science has not advanced civilization however, for we now know how to kill each other more efficiently.
There is some truth to your assertion that the scientific community has reduced the value of life to a set of natural laws (so to speak). However, I would say religion's mythical notion that man is essentially the climax of creation has played an equally important role in the great fallacy that is civilized thought. Through science/technology (agriculture specifically), man has leaned how to defeat the earth's ecological negative feedback system; allowing our population to grow unchecked. Religion has offered the justification. The difference is that while religion has taken misguided notions and ran with them; science has continued to study and advance our knowledge, and we have had the option of adjusting our behavior based on these new discoveries.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65706 Dec 9, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Evolution.
<quoted text>
Science hasn't been any more successful proving that genes alone guide human conduct than it has its bogus theory of evolution.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65707 Dec 9, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Do you kill witches? If not, you ignore your bible.
<quoted text>
It appears you are stuck in the 15th century.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65708 Dec 9, 2012
Some Random Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
There is some truth to your assertion that the scientific community has reduced the value of life to a set of natural laws (so to speak). However, I would say religion's mythical notion that man is essentially the climax of creation has played an equally important role in the great fallacy that is civilized thought. Through science/technology (agriculture specifically), man has leaned how to defeat the earth's ecological negative feedback system; allowing our population to grow unchecked. Religion has offered the justification. The difference is that while religion has taken misguided notions and ran with them; science has continued to study and advance our knowledge, and we have had the option of adjusting our behavior based on these new discoveries.
None of which explains the "source" of what we recognize as compassion and caring in our species as well as others.
Some Random Dude

Santa Cruz, CA

#65709 Dec 9, 2012
I think man probably WILL end up being the climax of creation here on earth... we're gonna make SURE of that.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#65710 Dec 9, 2012
Those that seek a win/win are more likely to be successful and selected on. Hence compassion.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Science hasn't been any more successful proving that genes alone guide human conduct than it has its bogus theory of evolution.
Thinking

Andover, UK

#65711 Dec 9, 2012
No, but you ignore the bible with regards to witches.
What else do you ignore in the bible?
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
It appears you are stuck in the 15th century.
Some Random Dude

Santa Cruz, CA

#65712 Dec 9, 2012
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
None of which explains the "source" of what we recognize as compassion and caring in our species as well as others.
"Compassion" is part of our genetic hard-wiring as social animals. We are definitely NOT the only creatures on the earth with a sense of compassion. Any animals that run in groups have a compassion element. It is absolutely necessary for the survival of the group.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#65713 Dec 9, 2012
Some Random Dude wrote:
There is some truth to your assertion that the scientific community has reduced the value of life to a set of natural laws (so to speak).
Science makes no claim as to the "value" of life. It may inform us as to why humans tend to value one thing over another. But it does not tell us *what* we should value.
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65714 Dec 9, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Those that seek a win/win are more likely to be successful and selected on. Hence compassion.
<quoted text>
Based on what evidence, 15th century delusions?
postscriptt

Santa Fe, NM

#65715 Dec 9, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Science makes no claim as to the "value" of life. It may inform us as to why humans tend to value one thing over another. But it does not tell us *what* we should value.
Such thinking allows science to have no morality, to ignore its responsibility to hold itself accountable for what it does.

A moral science that works to raise our humanity is imperative, particularly in the face of an endangered planet and nightmarish weapons spreading everywhere.
Some Random Dude

Santa Cruz, CA

#65716 Dec 9, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Science makes no claim as to the "value" of life. It may inform us as to why humans tend to value one thing over another. But it does not tell us *what* we should value.
Thus why I said "so to speak"

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#65717 Dec 9, 2012
You still arguing for the invisible sky wizard? What an idiot.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
From a sky god to a magical realm where dead matter mysteriously comes to life. A quantum leap indeed! LOL!
Some Random Dude

Santa Cruz, CA

#65718 Dec 9, 2012
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Such thinking allows science to have no morality, to ignore its responsibility to hold itself accountable for what it does.
A moral science that works to raise our humanity is imperative, particularly in the face of an endangered planet and nightmarish weapons spreading everywhere.
Unfortunately... short of a radical overhaul of our values as civilized people, there is no real way to "raise our humanity" to levels that it would require to stop our destructive path. We have been trying for at least 10,000 years to build a society that works but have failed every time because every system we build is based on a flawed premise that "this time man will act better than he ever has before". "He will be more moral". "He will be less destructive". "He will have more compassion". "He will be less greedy". Etc. Meanwhile, he repeats the same exact mistakes over and over again. He grows without limit. He expands "his" territory and subjugates whatever and whoever lives there... insisting that HIS way is the only way. He builds vast empires while oppressing his own subjects. It's invariably the same story every time. We are basically prisoners in a lifestyle that compels us to destroy the earth in order to survive. Science has of course provided evidence to support that assertion, but our system itself is fundamentally flawed in a way that in order for the system to work it must continue to play out this way and there are no other possibilities.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#65719 Dec 9, 2012
You lack the tools needed to understand. That's ok half wit. Get your GED and you might start catching on.
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
Science hasn't been any more successful proving that genes alone guide human conduct than it has its bogus theory of evolution.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#65720 Dec 9, 2012
postscriptt wrote:
<quoted text>
If science is not responsible for compassion, where does it come from?
Strange question. Science is the method we use to learn about how the universe works. Compassion is the feeling of identification we have to another intelligent being. So the question makes no sense to me. Now, compassion *is* a brain state and so is based on a physical process, if that was your issue/.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#65721 Dec 9, 2012
Some Random Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately... short of a radical overhaul of our values as civilized people, there is no real way to "raise our humanity" to levels that it would require to stop our destructive path. We have been trying for at least 10,000 years to build a society that works but have failed every time because every system we build is based on a flawed premise that "this time man will act better than he ever has before". "He will be more moral". "He will be less destructive". "He will have more compassion". "He will be less greedy". Etc. Meanwhile, he repeats the same exact mistakes over and over again. He grows without limit. He expands "his" territory and subjugates whatever and whoever lives there... insisting that HIS way is the only way. He builds vast empires while oppressing his own subjects. It's invariably the same story every time. We are basically prisoners in a lifestyle that compels us to destroy the earth in order to survive. Science has of course provided evidence to support that assertion, but our system itself is fundamentally flawed in a way that in order for the system to work it must continue to play out this way and there are no other possibilities.
And part of the problem is that the morality of 2000 years ago doesn't work well in today's society...we have to get rid of the religious mumbo jumbo and actually learn how to work together rather than using superstitious beliefs to drive us apart.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 7 min dollarsbill 12,774
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 hr dollarsbill 247,493
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 7 hr Agents of Corruption 47,818
News Atheist inmate wins right to practice his faith... 9 hr QUITTNER Sep 1 2015 12
Proof of God for the Atheist 13 hr Thinking 128
News Atheism, the Bible and sexual orientation 13 hr True Christian wi... 10
News As an atheist, how do I maintain my relationshi... 14 hr True Christian wi... 23
More from around the web