Atheists on the march in America

There are 20 comments on the Aug 26, 2009, TurkishPress.com story titled Atheists on the march in America. In it, TurkishPress.com reports that:

When South Florida atheists held their first meeting, they were just five friends, having a beer at a bar.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TurkishPress.com.

John

United States

#65472 Dec 3, 2012
You make the presupposition that there is no evidence without admitting you do not have the scientifically measurable evidence to support your position of nothing. You have placed limits on what may be limitless. You have placed limits where they need not be. Thus far I have seen no evidence provided by an atheist that would support what is disingenuously called natural mechanisms only. If you think there isn't evidence of design you would be wrong. Admittedly, this can not be proven using your constricting criteria, but nothing in this arena has been proven using this standard. You know this by now. That is why it is so frustrating to the forum when it's pointed out. Judging by the ever-growing anecdotal evidence of this forum overwhelmingly congregated by atheists, atheism is something else entirely. There is a large contingent of antitheists, a portion devoted to secular humanism, and some interplay with other assorted isms. The common denominator is that every single one of these positions is lacking in evidence. The notion that man is the be all end all is flawed in my opinion. Of course you wish to shirk any burden of proof. That's transparent and shows a weak position. Atheism has been co-opted by the new atheist. Much more vocal and commited to breaking down the populace writ large that actually do have a position. I've given more than enough opportunity for atheists to engage in debate that is not circular. The brilliance and weakness of atheism is no accountability. That's why it's not challenging to debate this topic with you loons. Apologies to the few that aren't driven by more than uncertainty. When Reagan debated Gorbachev on our nuclear arsenals each man had a position. If there was a political debate the political atheist would attack the other position and not have to be responsible for one himself. If one football team was atheist and the other was not they would have the ball on offense the whole game. Fumble, and the ball would be returned. This is what you ask for here, but is unacceptable in every other topic. I'm conservative btw. A rational freethinker. I'm sure you are a centrist LOL. What's the mushy middle thought on government size, abortion, tax rates?
If there isn't a position don't bother responding. How is the fence DREW, Curious, Mikey,,,,? You got the post wedged good and deep yet? Stump an antitheist! Ask it what it believes. Still going strong 62,800 plus posts in.
Still nothing about atheism in the atheist forum. No position, no post #. Lies, spin, ad hominem, and boredom.
Waiting for an example of what passes the cut for evidence from atheists. Cowards!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#65473 Dec 3, 2012
BBSting wrote:
Photo on the left is a 125 million year old fossil of a mayfly.
Photo on the right is the mayfly as it exists today. They are identical. No change, and this is just one of many examples. Here's the proof right before your eyes that the theory of evolution is a myth!
http://www.harunyahya.com/image/Atlas_of_crea...
That doesn't prove squat.(And that's assuming what they are saying is accurate.) Mutations are random, so some species may not have changed at all, or at least to the point you can tell just by looking.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#65474 Dec 3, 2012
John wrote:
Drew you are embarassing yourself. Please continue.
Stump an antitheist! Ask them what they believe.
Fun fact of the day- for every 1 job created in the Obama administration 75 went on food stamps.
Why do con dumbs just randomly insert Obama's name into conversations?
postscript

Santa Fe, NM

#65475 Dec 3, 2012
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually we have a very complete fossil record now.
If you understood anything about the conditions it takes to fossilize something, you'd understand how amazing it is that we have found as many fossils as we have.
Biological evolution is the most research areas of science worldwide and has been for over 150 years now. The vast amounts of evidence we have amassed and the overwhelming predictive benefit we have by the use of this theory, all continue to underscore and strengthen the overall confidence scientists in all Earth sciences disciplines have in the biological evolution.
You might want to read some layman level explinations from HidingFromYou to help with your understanding --
" http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T... ;
Or Polymath --
" http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T... ;
Science has suppositions which translated means "nada". You might want to invest in a spell checker.
postscript

Santa Fe, NM

#65476 Dec 3, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
That doesn't prove squat.(And that's assuming what they are saying is accurate.) Mutations are random, so some species may not have changed at all, or at least to the point you can tell just by looking.
Nothing is random. The problem with science's version of the origin of the universe is this: Like religion, it assumes genesis was an isolated event. It wasn't. Consciousness out of which all else springs forms all systems simultaneously. In other words, the universe is always being created.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#65477 Dec 3, 2012
Because it was Jesus who did it right?

Rotflmfao!
postscript wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing is random. The problem with science's version of the origin of the universe is this: Like religion, it assumes genesis was an isolated event. It wasn't. Consciousness out of which all else springs forms all systems simultaneously. In other words, the universe is always being created.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#65478 Dec 3, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
Good article with clear precise proof backing up your claims. Sadly man people like Nan don't want to hear anything different than what their preacher says in church. If your information doesn't include Jesus magicked everything into existence she won't be satisfied.
One must remember she is the same idiot who claimed to have a horrible disease that will take her life in less than a year and has no cure but then a few posts later says, nope I am already cured!
Lmfao! You just gotta shake your head at these creationist apologetic morons man. Until they open their eyes and are willing to honestly look at real science they are stuck in sheep mode, bleating all the way home.
<quoted text>
It's too bad that you have to lie to try and sound intelligent.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#65479 Dec 3, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
Why? Don't you judge something to be good if you find it beneficial to your life? Why does "purpose" have anything to do with it?
<quoted text>
Imagine that, you figured out that "good" and "bad" are relative to *specific* purposes. Not to some overarching objective "purpose of life" for everyone.
<quoted text>
I don't see a "universe from nothing". So your question is wrong from the beginning.
Bullshyt. A couple years ago you were espousing Krauss's theory of a universe from nothing....then somebody brought up the fact that virtual particles do not "poof" into existence from "nothing". You are about as relevant as a smoke ring in a snowstorm.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#65480 Dec 3, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
A couple years ago you were espousing Krauss's theory of a universe from nothing
Prove it.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#65481 Dec 3, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why wouldn't there be large gaps in the fossils we have discovered? Think we have discovered every fossil there is? Think every animal who has died has been fossilized?
Even more so, does every dead animal (or plant, fungus, etc) have an equal likelihood of becoming a fossil? Is the rate of fossilization such that we would expect a continuous record? Do the 'gaps' match what we know about fossilization in general and the likelihood of fossilization in various environments? Are species that live in environments that we would predict to higher rates of fossilization better represented in the record?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#65482 Dec 3, 2012
Says the retard who posted she had less than a year to live from a horrible disease and then poof she's all cured now.

Lmfao!

Hey post those so called atheist doctrines half wit! Go ahead it's probably in your apologetic book. Hurry up now or accept defeat yet again.

We so humiliate you and it's sad you lack the IQ to see it.
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>It's too bad that you have to lie to try and sound intelligent.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#65483 Dec 3, 2012
She talks so much Bullsht she can't keep up with it.
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
postscript

Santa Fe, NM

#65484 Dec 3, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why wouldn't there be large gaps in the fossils we have discovered? Think we have discovered every fossil there is? Think every animal who has died has been fossilized?
Not every critter, just the ones that would make science's evolutionary fairy tale true.
postscript

Santa Fe, NM

#65485 Dec 3, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
Because it was Jesus who did it right?
Rotflmfao!
<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity, do your parents have tails?

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#65486 Dec 3, 2012
postscript wrote:
Not every critter, just the ones that would make science's evolutionary fairy tale true.
Quite enough fossils have been found that common ancestry is fully supported by the fossil record:

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.h...
postscript

Santa Fe, NM

#65487 Dec 3, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Quite enough fossils have been found that common ancestry is fully supported by the fossil record:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.h...
Common ancestry? You mean like the fish Coelacanth for example, supposedly extinct 70 million years ago and presented by evolutionists as a "transitional form" between marine and land creatures? It was found alive and well in 1939 near Madagascar, and has been caught about 50 times since? LOL!

There is no reason to believe that fish were radically different eons ago from what they are now. To suggest that they lived long enough in shallow water to turn gills into lungs is absurd hence the lack of transitional forms. Fish are fish. It was true then and it's true now.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#65488 Dec 3, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>It's too bad that you have to lie to try and sound intelligent.
retard didn't even read it.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#65489 Dec 3, 2012
Lmfao after all the times I have factually crushed you? Sigh you make such a jackass out of yourself.

But at least you stopped pretending to be an agnostic. Sheesh that was as convincing as Dave's claim to be a deist!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a!
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>retard didn't even read it.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#65490 Dec 3, 2012
Jesus waved around his magical fish billions of years ago and made the universe right?

Google up evolution human tailbone before you humiliate yourself further.

You're welcome half wit.
postscript wrote:
<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity, do your parents have tails?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#65492 Dec 4, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
Why should I be expected to prove anything to you if scientists don't have to? I remember what you spewed, that's good enough for me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 26 min James 6,100
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 38 min James 7,403
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 hr Insults Are Easier 237,997
The Ultimate Evidence of God (Mar '14) 3 hr James 163
News The Consequences of Atheism 4 hr QUITTNER Apr 24 2015 1,306
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 hr Dogen 18,668
News Atheists open up: What they want you to know 8 hr Patrick n Angela 29
More from around the web