A Proof That God Exists
James

Kalamazoo, MI

#1958 Oct 13, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly!
Reality does not care if some idiot believes in it or not.
Reality just is.
Reality will still kill that same idiot regardless, if he **ignores** reality in favor of his stupid delusions (religion).
Stupid delusions are what happens when someone believes different than you and it affects how you feel. How's that for reality.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1959 Oct 13, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid delusions are what happens when someone believes different than you and it affects how you feel. How's that for reality.
Reality is what it is-- regardless if you believe in it or not.

But it is quite clear-- you are full of hate.

You are obviously **bothered** by what I wrote-- or you would not show me such hateful comments.

I find that quite ironic, in light of your attempted message, here.

LOL!
James

Kalamazoo, MI

#1960 Oct 13, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality is what it is-- regardless if you believe in it or not.
But it is quite clear-- you are full of hate.
You are obviously **bothered** by what I wrote-- or you would not show me such hateful comments.
I find that quite ironic, in light of your attempted message, here.
LOL!
Obviously you don't know the difference between hatred and beliefs. And I'm not going to take my time to explain the difference to you.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1961 Oct 13, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you don't know the difference between hatred and beliefs. And I'm not going to take my time to explain the difference to you.
Oh I understand the difference all too well.

You are hateful-- your first post to me was denigrating and a blatant attempt to belittle me, personally.

That's hate, bub.

You reek of it.
James

Kalamazoo, MI

#1962 Oct 13, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I understand the difference all too well.
You are hateful-- your first post to me was denigrating and a blatant attempt to belittle me, personally.
That's hate, bub.
You reek of it.
But you think it's okay when you do it huh? You shouldn't be so selfish.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1963 Oct 13, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
*cough* Really?
You say this like you did and say *I* have to brush up on my physics?
Show me *one* modern physics book, say from the last 50 years, that makes the claim that time is an 'accident' of matter. Not a philosophy book. A physics book.
I have passed the PhD qualifying exams in physics as well as taking a variety of graduate level physics courses. I doubt you have ever thought deeply about the Schrodinger equation or know the difference between it and the Dirac equation. I very much doubt that you know *anything* past the popular drivel concerning general relativity nor could you read, say, Weinberg's book on cosmology.
-------

As I can see you prefer the fallacy to appeal to authorities than use Logic to think straight.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1964 Oct 13, 2013
Darwins Stepchild wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you learned wrong. Time is part of the geometry of the universe. Not an accident of motion.
----
As I can see, you can't think Logic. Time to exist it must be measured. One cannot measure time in inertia. Motion must be there for time to happen. Therefore, time is an accident of matter.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1965 Oct 13, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have woken up. You are still stuck on ancient ideas of causality that were overthrown both by general relativity (in particular, the Big Bang) and by quantum mechanics. You are still stuck in a viewpoint that was overthrown in the 1930's.
--------

Where were the atheists that a theist had to develop the theory of the BB? Aren't you ashamed that you have to worship a god fabricated by a theist? Do I have to remind you that George Lemaitre was a theist Catholic priest? Besides, the BB came only to confirm what the Bible has been saying all along thousands of years that the universe had a beginning. The scientists who have some sense believed and changed their views. Why don't you recognized the debt you owe to Theism and show some respect?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1966 Oct 14, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you don't know the difference between hatred and beliefs. And I'm not going to take my time to explain the difference to you.
Creationists like to act offended, after calling all atheists fools in their cult book. That's what the mental illness of faith does to believers - makes em forget.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1967 Oct 14, 2013
James wrote:
<quoted text>
But you think it's okay when you do it huh? You shouldn't be so selfish.
Its is ok to lie about a god you have no evidence for and plenty of evidence against?

I thought not, you make go back to your cult now and tell them you failed to convert any atheists today.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1968 Oct 14, 2013
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>
--------
Where were the atheists that a theist had to develop the theory of the BB? Aren't you ashamed that you have to worship a god fabricated by a theist? Do I have to remind you that George Lemaitre was a theist Catholic priest? Besides, the BB came only to confirm what the Bible has been saying all along thousands of years that the universe had a beginning. The scientists who have some sense believed and changed their views. Why don't you recognized the debt you owe to Theism and show some respect?
When you are a able to prove your god is honest, hard evidence instead of religious lies based on none, you will reach true salvation.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1969 Oct 14, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
When you are a able to prove your god is honest, hard evidence instead of religious lies based on none, you will reach true salvation.
-----

That's proof that you don't have an answer to logical questions. Shame on you!!!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1970 Oct 14, 2013
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>
--------
Where were the atheists that a theist had to develop the theory of the BB?
Being science works the way it does... It wouldn't matter if it was an atheist or a theist. You don't start with conclusions. You end with them.
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>Aren't you ashamed that you have to worship a god fabricated by a theist?
No. I used to. Now I am an atheist. The way you positioned that question seems to imply you aren't talking about the Christian god though. Are you trying to call the BB a god? That would be incredibly strange.
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text> Do I have to remind you that George Lemaitre was a theist Catholic priest?
Irrelevant
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>Besides, the BB came only to confirm what the Bible has been saying all along thousands of years that the universe had a beginning.
6000 years is a big difference and magic was now the cause
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>The scientists who have some sense believed and changed their views. Why don't you recognized the debt you owe to Theism and show some respect?
We should so respect to THEISTS not theism. Theism wasn't a tool used in those discoveries. It had to be left out. To owe a debt to theism for scientific discovery is like thanking a taxi driver for wearing a blind fold to get you to your destination.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1971 Oct 14, 2013
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>
-----
That's proof that you don't have an answer to logical questions. Shame on you!!!
You're the failure that can't prove the god you lied about in the first place! Wake up stupid!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1972 Oct 14, 2013
This little gem is topical to this thread, so here you go:

Seven Godly Sins

If god destroys people for not obeying him, it is WRATH
If god punishes people for believing in a different god, it is ENVY
If god lets tragedies and disasters happen of which he could have prevented, it is SLOTH
If god allows anyone to hunger unnecessarily while he has enough for himself, it is GLUTTONY
If god expects his followers to dedicate their lives to worshiping and praying to him, it is PRIDE
If god insists his followers pay tithes and offerings for his approval, it is GREED
If god intends on being party to every marriage, it is LUST

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1973 Oct 14, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
This little gem is topical to this thread, so here you go:
Seven Godly Sins
If god destroys people for not obeying him, it is WRATH
If god punishes people for believing in a different god, it is ENVY
If god lets tragedies and disasters happen of which he could have prevented, it is SLOTH
If god allows anyone to hunger unnecessarily while he has enough for himself, it is GLUTTONY
If god expects his followers to dedicate their lives to worshiping and praying to him, it is PRIDE
If god insists his followers pay tithes and offerings for his approval, it is GREED
If god intends on being party to every marriage, it is LUST
Whoa

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1974 Oct 15, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Being science works the way it does... It wouldn't matter if it was an atheist or a theist. You don't start with conclusions. You end with them.
<quoted text>
No. I used to. Now I am an atheist. The way you positioned that question seems to imply you aren't talking about the Christian god though. Are you trying to call the BB a god? That would be incredibly strange.
<quoted text>
Irrelevant
<quoted text>
6000 years is a big difference and magic was now the cause
<quoted text>
We should so respect to THEISTS not theism. Theism wasn't a tool used in those discoveries. It had to be left out. To owe a debt to theism for scientific discovery is like thanking a taxi driver for wearing a blind fold to get you to your destination.
-----

Yes, "irrelevant" because the creator of the BB theory was a theist. If he had been an atheist you would be today dancing the dance of joy. Hey! Atheists don't have that kind of brain. Perhaps it was because of this reason that Einstein in answer to a question if he was an atheist he said, "Absolutely not; I could never be an atheist." (Out of My Later Years)

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#1975 Oct 15, 2013
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>
-----
Yes, "irrelevant" because the creator of the BB theory was a theist. If he had been an atheist you would be today dancing the dance of joy. Hey! Atheists don't have that kind of brain. Perhaps it was because of this reason that Einstein in answer to a question if he was an atheist he said, "Absolutely not; I could never be an atheist." (Out of My Later Years)
No. I'm saying the belief in god is irrelevant in honest science. Not in my praise to the scientists.

Which is also irrelevant

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#1976 Oct 20, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I'm saying the belief in god is irrelevant in honest science. Not in my praise to the scientists.
Which is also irrelevant
-----

See what I mean? Atheism does not make sense.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1977 Oct 20, 2013
Ben_Masada wrote:
<quoted text>
-----
Yes, "irrelevant" because the creator of the BB theory was a theist. If he had been an atheist you would be today dancing the dance of joy. Hey! Atheists don't have that kind of brain. Perhaps it was because of this reason that Einstein in answer to a question if he was an atheist he said, "Absolutely not; I could never be an atheist." (Out of My Later Years)
Says the dumb sh*t with no proof of god, lying about atheists because he is bitter at his own cult.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 min Into The Night 48,654
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 9 min Richardfs 5,698
Athetists' best bet is that there is a God. 1 hr JustASkeptic 40
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 7 hr scientia potentia... 23,511
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 9 hr Thinking 21,875
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 11 hr ChristineM 258,041
News Louisiana Christians reclaim safe space by runn... 12 hr Mikko 1
More from around the web