A Proof That God Exists

Posted in the Atheism Forum

Comments (Page 95)

Showing posts 1,881 - 1,900 of1,922
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1938
Jul 23, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Virtual particles are not caused.
<quoted text>
So you persist in ignoring the actual evidence by making false philosophical claims.
No, time and space are NOT accidents of matter.
------

As I said above, you must review Physics if you ever had any background on.

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1939
Jul 23, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
How have I done that?
Once again, and very carefully. If I put a particle into a superpositional state, the specific state it is detected in by a later experiment is uncaused. It is purely probabilistic.
If you don't understand the examples, just ask about them.
In the decay of a muon, there is no difference between the muon a pico-second before the decay and that muon at any other time.The decay itself is uncaused. There is no 'fuse' inside a muon or spring that goes off to make it decay.
For virtual particles, they literally come into existence out of nothing in a purely probabilistic way: there is no causality here.
In the case of an electron in a double slit experiment, there is no way, even in theory, to predict where the electron will hit the detector. it is purely probabilistic and uncaused.
Maybe we have a difference in definitions. Perhaps we can get further if you give me *your* definition of the word 'cause'. What do *you* mean when you say that 'A causes B'? Be precise. Don't simply give trivial examples; give a precise definition.
-------

Electrons are part of the atom. Atoms are the constitution of matter. Matter cannot be uncaused. Here you are in default for not understanding logic in Physics.

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1940
Jul 23, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Time, space, energy, and matter are all co-existent and uncaused.
-------

You are still stuck to the Aristotelian concept of the universe which has become obsolete since 1922. Wake up and smell the coffee.

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1941
Jul 23, 2013
 
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Bullshit. No two ways about that-- you are flat wrong.
----

I cannot reply a post with ad hominem.

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1942
Jul 23, 2013
 
Darwins Stepchild wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh...no.
I suggest you stay away from the subject of physics since you know virtually nothing about it.
-------

The same goes for you. I learned in Physics text book that time is an accident of motion.

Since: Feb 13

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1943
Jul 23, 2013
 
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
The way you theists argue against established definitions is both evil and dishonest.
-----

I can reply to posts with ad hominem.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1944
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
----
You might want to brush up in your Physics.
*cough* Really?

You say this like you did and say *I* have to brush up on my physics?

Show me *one* modern physics book, say from the last 50 years, that makes the claim that time is an 'accident' of matter. Not a philosophy book. A physics book.

I have passed the PhD qualifying exams in physics as well as taking a variety of graduate level physics courses. I doubt you have ever thought deeply about the Schrodinger equation or know the difference between it and the Dirac equation. I very much doubt that you know *anything* past the popular drivel concerning general relativity nor could you read, say, Weinberg's book on cosmology.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1945
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
------
As I said above, you must review Physics if you ever had any background on.
When was the last time you actually opened a physics book? Again, not a philosophy book dealing with physics or a popular magazine, but an actual textbook in physics?

I would suggest *you* have a LOT to learn about modern physics. Including, I might add, that the old views of causality due to Aristotle are not considered to be valid any longer. Causality is NOT a requirement of quantum mechanics.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1946
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
The same goes for you. I learned in Physics text book that time is an accident of motion.
Garbage. Which textbook?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1947
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
You are still stuck to the Aristotelian concept of the universe which has become obsolete since 1922. Wake up and smell the coffee.
I have woken up. You are still stuck on ancient ideas of causality that were overthrown both by general relativity (in particular, the Big Bang) and by quantum mechanics. You are still stuck in a viewpoint that was overthrown in the 1930's.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1948
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
Electrons are part of the atom. Atoms are the constitution of matter. Matter cannot be uncaused. Here you are in default for not understanding logic in Physics.
And I am pointing out that your statement 'matter cannot be uncaused' is simply false. it is shown via actual observations to be false.

Electrons can exist quite easily outside of atoms.
Thinking

Todmorden, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1949
Jul 23, 2013
 
Why? Is it haram?
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
----
I cannot reply a post with ad hominem.
Thinking

Todmorden, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1950
Jul 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

So what is beta decay then?
Wake up and smell the bacon.
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
Electrons are part of the atom.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1951
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
----
I cannot reply a post with ad hominem.
There was no ad hominem in my post.

I declared that you were flat wrong-- that's a criticism, not a personal attack.

But a take you inability to ANSWER as your admission of defeat.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1952
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
The same goes for you. I learned in Physics text book that time is an accident of motion.
You learned false.

In fact?

99.9999% of what you claim is false...

... Back To School for YOU.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1953
Jul 23, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
----
I cannot reply a post with ad hominem.
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-----
I can reply to posts with ad hominem.
You can?

Or you cannot?

WHICH IS IT?

<laughing out loud at you>

“Turning coffee into theorems”

Since: Dec 06

Trapped inside a Klein Bottle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1954
Jul 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
The same goes for you. I learned in Physics text book that time is an accident of motion.
Then you learned wrong. Time is part of the geometry of the universe. Not an accident of motion.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1955
Jul 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LCN Llin wrote:
<quoted text>
If your ideas were valid you would not need to be so defensive!
Relax you are amusing
Atheism does not require defense, because its reality. Its your cult that needs a dose of honesty and morality.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1956
Jul 25, 2013
 
Shibolet wrote:
<quoted text>
----
You might want to brush up in your Physics.
Says the creationist troll who cannot prove a single part of his cult's story with science.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1957
Jul 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism does not require defense, because its reality. Its your cult that needs a dose of honesty and morality.
Exactly!

Reality does not care if some idiot believes in it or not.

Reality just is.

Reality will still kill that same idiot regardless, if he **ignores** reality in favor of his stupid delusions (religion).

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,881 - 1,900 of1,922
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••