A Proof That God Exists

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1467 May 3, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, it does.
Atheism is a belief, namely, that no god exists.
Lie. I have no belief in that way at all.

All I ask? Is for MEASURABLE PROOF of your idiot-notion "god".

That's it.

Measurable PROOF.

Until then?

Your idiotic claim is false: the default position (without proof).

But YOU?

Are clearly a moron of the lowest grade.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1468 May 3, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
"In fact, atheism is an active belief that God doesn’t exist."
-Jonathan Safarti, PhD
Who is this GODBOT? One of your butt-buddies?

Or is this just someone you fantasize about effing all night long?

LOL!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1469 May 3, 2013
Thinking wrote:
He doesn't believe in infinity, either.
<quoted text>
He's a low grade moron.

At best.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1470 May 3, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Most encyclopedias and dictionaries give both meanings, not just the one that you insist on. which one applies in a conversation depends on contest. The context of a forum is set by its core members. In the atheist forum, that means atheists, not our adversaries. This is a fundamental principle of lexicography.
I know that you are extremely stubborn by nature and that it is nearly impossible for you to change your mind about anything, much less admit that you are mistaken, but it's time for you to do both. you are simply wrong about this.
Buck clearly has a severe case of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, to the point that he is nearly incapacitated.

This easily explains his frequent incarceration.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#1471 May 3, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You are either a liar, or stupid, or both.
I'm leaning toward you being both, RichardFuckStick.
"‘Atheism’ means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God."
-Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
"Atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. It proposes positive belief rather than mere suspension of disbelief."
-Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
"Atheism is to be distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question of whether there is a god or not, professing to find the question unanswered or unanswerable; for the atheist, the nonexistence of God is a certainty."
-Encyclopedia Britannica
"In fact, atheism is an active belief that God doesn’t exist."
-Jonathan Safarti, PhD
Instead of looking up so called definitions of what atheists are why not ask the people themselves and listen to them or is that too difficult.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1472 May 3, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Instead of looking up so called definitions of what atheists are why not ask the people themselves and listen to them or is that too difficult.
Buckster prefers living in his own delusions.

If he asked someone, he would have to admit that he was ... wrong.

His massive ego, and his OCD prevents such activity.

It really is amusing.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#1473 May 4, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Lie. I have no belief in that way at all.
All I ask? Is for MEASURABLE PROOF of your idiot-notion "god".
That's it.
Measurable PROOF.
Until then?
Your idiotic claim is false: the default position (without proof).
But YOU?
Are clearly a moron of the lowest grade.
You claim you have "no belief" that god does not exist, then call god's existence an "idiot notion"??

You are too stupid to realize you just proved yourself a liar.

Saved others the trouble. Thanks.

_-Alice-_

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#1475 May 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
An objective source is superior to a subjective one.
This is especially true since atheists often lie, RichardFuckStick.
Atheists lie about atheism?

Why didn't you tell me earlier? Now how should I believe in?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#1476 May 4, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Most encyclopedias and dictionaries give both meanings, not just the one that you insist on. which one applies in a conversation depends on contest. The context of a forum is set by its core members. In the atheist forum, that means atheists, not our adversaries. This is a fundamental principle of lexicography.
I know that you are extremely stubborn by nature and that it is nearly impossible for you to change your mind about anything, much less admit that you are mistaken, but it's time for you to do both. you are simply wrong about this.
Pure nonsense.

If the meaning of a term can be manipulated, as is the attempt atheists are making here, then words have no meaning.

Context DOES NOT determine the meaning of a term, when a term has a well-established, specific meaning.

Particularly, the dilution of the term here, "atheist", is a self-serving attempt. As I have explained, this is a fairly modern effort to elevate "atheism" to a more objective and rational viewpoint.

The proper course, if the person adopting terms for his viewpoint wishes to elevate the quality of his self-description, is to adopt a more descriptive term. Specifically, if he is in possession of no belief as to the non-existence of God or gods, he should utilize the proper, well-understood term for this position, which would be "agnosticism".

A Nazi would be acting improperly and dishonestly if he adopted the term "Nazi" for his viewpoint, then attempted to improve his position by simply manipulating the meaning into something other than what "Nazi" is understood to mean.

In a nutshell - "atheism" means the belief that no god exists. To claim otherwise is self-serving and dishonest.
Imhotep

Silver Springs, FL

#1477 May 4, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you-- I switched to the USA version, and got it-- I'll read it later.
Sounds quite interesting.
I tried to get it and had problem with it they wanted money

So you can post a interesting excerpt!

Oh it's Saturday morning it's a no work day for me no driving

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1478 May 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You claim you have "no belief" that god does not exist, then call god's existence an "idiot notion"??
Correct-- that is not a belief, that is an observation.

Only an IDIOT would believe in god without SUBSTANTIAL proof.

That is not belief--that is observation.

So I did not lie.

And you?

ARE AN IDIOT-- STILL.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1479 May 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
... you just proved yourself a liar.
Saved others the trouble. Thanks.
Many have tried-- ALL have failed to prove me a liar.

This is because I have not lied.

But you?

You remain as stupid as ever.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1480 May 4, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Pure nonsense.
Thanks for warning us what the rest of your IDIOT post was going to consist of.

Good!

Saves ever so much time, too!

But "pure nonsense" is what we expect from ... and IDIOT.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1481 May 4, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
I tried to get it and had problem with it they wanted money
So you can post a interesting excerpt!
Oh it's Saturday morning it's a no work day for me no driving
I got it-- haven't read it. I'm in the middle of a series right now, and it's pretty good.

I'll get around to it eventually.

:)
Lincoln

United States

#1482 May 4, 2013
“Do not become so attached to any one belief
than you cannot see past
it to another possibility.

Brom to Eragon”
&#8213; Christopher Paolini, Brisingr
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

#1483 May 4, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Instead of looking up so called definitions of what atheists are why not ask the people themselves and listen to them or is that too difficult.
that was to BC, anything decent or logical is too difficult for him.
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

#1484 May 4, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Cognitive dissonance is a particular issue for the fundamentalist believers.
<quoted text>
they don't care!
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

#1485 May 4, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
“Do not become so attached to any one belief
than you cannot see past
it to another possibility.
Brom to Eragon”
&#8213; Christopher Paolini, Brisingr
including not thinking it necessary to have a belief on a particular matter.
Lincoln

United States

#1486 May 4, 2013
havent forgotten wrote:
<quoted text> including not thinking it necessary to have a belief on a particular matter.
oui

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1488 May 5, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
“Do not become so attached to any one belief
than you cannot see past
it to another possibility.
Brom to Eragon”
&#8213; Christopher Paolini, Brisingr
"Lincoln is a passive-aggressive creationist troll who sh*ts lies about atheists in this forum instead of engaging with the forum users, because he is a coward who has no proof of the god he is lying about." - Skeptic.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 11 min Subduction Zone 61,052
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 2 hr yehoshooah adam 2,641
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 3 hr Into The Night 28,308
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) 20 hr Eagle 12 452
Deconversion Mon Eagle 12 138
News Quotes from Famous Freethinkers (Aug '12) Mar 18 Eagle 12 2,043
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Mar 14 superwilly 258,490
More from around the web