The Atheist God

Oct 7, 2013 Full story: Daily Kos 152

An odd title I know, but maybe not as odd as one might think. I am an Atheist in the purest sense, but I am still in some ways forced to contemplate God, though it may not be my own.

Full Story

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#62 Oct 22, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>The Messiah is going to legalize most drugs but I'm not sure about LSD or shrooms. It they are included, there will probably be more laws about their use. I haven't tripped in a very long time, I'm mental now and I don't know how it would affect me.
...







<thrums fingers on table>








<whistles and rubs temples>










<exhales>

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#63 Oct 22, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>The Messiah is going to legalize most drugs but I'm not sure about LSD or shrooms. It they are included, there will probably be more laws about their use. I haven't tripped in a very long time, I'm mental now and I don't know how it would affect me.
Perhaps it would help.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#64 Oct 22, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps it would help.
I strongly suspect it would.

It **certainly** could not make her any worse...
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#65 Oct 22, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps it would help.
It may very well help with the arrival of the first Day of the Lord, VWD Day. It stands for Vengeance, Wrath, and Destruction. First the enemies of God and then all the wicked will burst into flames.(Spontaneous combustion). The scripture says my help is in me and my own right hand will save me. It's been thirty years since my calling began and I'm waiting on the power to throw a lightning bolt. When I get the power, I'll know when VWD Day is going to start and I'll post it.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#66 Oct 22, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>It may very well help with the arrival of the first Day of the Lord, VWD Day. It stands for Vengeance, Wrath, and Destruction. First the enemies of God and then all the wicked will burst into flames.(Spontaneous combustion). The scripture says my help is in me and my own right hand will save me. It's been thirty years since my calling began and I'm waiting on the power to throw a lightning bolt. When I get the power, I'll know when VWD Day is going to start and I'll post it.
Please don't ruin the surprise!
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#67 Oct 22, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Please don't ruin the surprise!
I don't know if you're aware of it RH, but there was supposed to be a surprise when I conversed with Gabrielle 32 years ago. The surprise was the same as the secret, God is a woman. That is why God wouldn't tell her name when asked by Moses and instead said, I AM. Gabriel was also reincarnated as a woman and her real name is Gabrielle! I think an angel is supposed to appear to me or I'll have another vision.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#68 Oct 22, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know if you're aware of it RH, but there was supposed to be a surprise when I conversed with Gabrielle 32 years ago. The surprise was the same as the secret, God is a woman. That is why God wouldn't tell her name when asked by Moses and instead said, I AM. Gabriel was also reincarnated as a woman and her real name is Gabrielle! I think an angel is supposed to appear to me or I'll have another vision.
Sounds like you've already had some whoppers! I'm sure another one will be along shortly. Frankly, either way you go with assigning a gender to a being like "God" would open more questions than it answers. For instance ... with whom or with what would such a creature copulate? Mortals? Another "God" of the same or opposite sex? Would they have viable offspring? Would these offspring be capable of creating Universes like their parent(s)?
susanblange

Norfolk, VA

#69 Oct 23, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you've already had some whoppers! I'm sure another one will be along shortly. Frankly, either way you go with assigning a gender to a being like "God" would open more questions than it answers. For instance ... with whom or with what would such a creature copulate? Mortals? Another "God" of the same or opposite sex? Would they have viable offspring? Would these offspring be capable of creating Universes like their parent(s)?
Adam was Gods only son and we are all children of God. There is no sex in heaven, the serpent was an earthly creation. There are no serpents in heaven.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#70 Oct 23, 2013
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>Adam was Gods only son and we are all children of God. There is no sex in heaven, the serpent was an earthly creation. There are no serpents in heaven.
Sounds like you have pretty much taken the bait along with the hook, line and sinker! But, if that's what it takes to get you through the night ...
bbb

Sydney, Australia

#71 Nov 18, 2013
Their'god' is Darwin.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#72 Nov 18, 2013
bbb wrote:
Their'god' is Darwin.
Nope.

Darwin was one of yours, stupid. He was brilliant, sure. And he discovered the fact of evolution.

But he **was** trained as a godbot-- just like you.

Fortunately for science? He did not let his godbottery get in the way of the actual facts.
Thinking

Windsor, UK

#73 Nov 19, 2013
Some godbots must think we have shrines to Dawkins and Darwin!

Newton was a godbot, alchemist and scientist.

The scientific method allows us to use his whatever parts of his science that are shown to work whilst discarding his religion and his alchemy.

As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant.
Same goes for Darwin.
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
Darwin was one of yours, stupid. He was brilliant, sure. And he discovered the fact of evolution.
But he **was** trained as a godbot-- just like you.
Fortunately for science? He did not let his godbottery get in the way of the actual facts.
Siro

Sydney, Australia

#74 Nov 19, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Some godbots must think we have shrines to Dawkins and Darwin!
Newton was a godbot, alchemist and scientist.
The scientific method allows us to use his whatever parts of his science that are shown to work whilst discarding his religion and his alchemy.
As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant.
Same goes for Darwin.
<quoted text>
You think Newton is irrelevant and yet everything Dawkins says is gospel.
.
HA HA youre a cuckold douche
Thinking

Windsor, UK

#75 Nov 19, 2013
No, I don't have a god. I don't worship anyone for the scientific method to work.

When Dawkins dies, his peer reviewed science papers will live far longer than any church you have attended.
bbb wrote:
Their'god' is Darwin.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#76 Nov 19, 2013
bbb wrote:
Their'god' is Darwin.
Who's god? And is there actually a god? Can you prove it? Or is it like all the rest of the god claims? You know, like where one person says "My god does _____!(fill in the blank), and the guy next to him says's "My god does _____ and _____!(fill in the blanks, and the guy next to him says "My god does ____ and ___ too, and he does it better than yours!"?

A million or more gods all individually formed to fit the religitard who carries him out to the rest of the world, where he then is passed around and changed to suit every new individual's own specific wants from a god. And then he is spread some more, and changed again and again ......

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#77 Nov 19, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
You think Newton is irrelevant and yet everything Dawkins says is gospel.
.
HA HA youre a cuckold douche
Hey religitard, pay atention.

From the same post that you responded to.

>>> "As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant.
Same goes for Darwin." <<<

Read it again and pay heed to the last 4 words. Funny huh? Now it's really who you are the true douche.
Siro

Brisbane, Australia

#78 Nov 20, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Hey religitard, pay atention.
From the same post that you responded to.
>>> "As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant.
Same goes for Darwin." <<<
Read it again and pay heed to the last 4 words. Funny huh? Now it's really who you are the true douche.
Yep...read it......so you agree that Newton and Darwin are irrelevant as people?
If they as people are irrelevant then anything that came from them must be irrelevant. Thats the topix atheist mentality.
.
Anyway it is you who are the true douche, with your crappy cooking and constant whining you give everyone the sh!ts
.
The only atheist God and only God is Jehovah the God of Abraham.
But topix atheists think that he should worship them
Thinking

Windsor, UK

#79 Nov 20, 2013
Exactly. The solid peer reviewed science of Newton, Darwin and Dawkins didn't need to come from those people.

If others had made the same discoveries, they would be equally valid.

If one found out that Newton was actually a terrible murderer, the Earth would continue to orbit the Sun predictably in line with his peer reviewed equations.
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Hey religitard, pay atention.
From the same post that you responded to.
>>> "As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant.
Same goes for Darwin." <<<
Read it again and pay heed to the last 4 words. Funny huh? Now it's really who you are the true douche.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#80 Nov 20, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep...read it......so you agree that Newton and Darwin are irrelevant as people?
If they as people are irrelevant then anything that came from them must be irrelevant. Thats the topix atheist mentality.
.
Anyway it is you who are the true douche, with your crappy cooking and constant whining you give everyone the sh!ts
.
The only atheist God and only God is Jehovah the God of Abraham.
But topix atheists think that he should worship them
Here we go again.

Hey religitard, pay attention.

"You think Newton is irrelevant and yet everything Dawkins says is gospel"

"As time goes by, Newton the person becomes almost irrelevant. Same goes for Darwin."

Can you see where you lost the gist of these post? He said both were the same, you read it and said that he said one was this, and the other was something else. I point out your error, and now you want me to acquiesce to your pitiful and erroneous conclusion?

Do you really care, which side of the highway you are trying to block traffic on. If you have something to say, maybe you could try just saying it, for a change.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#81 Nov 20, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Exactly. The solid peer reviewed science of Newton, Darwin and Dawkins didn't need to come from those people.
If others had made the same discoveries, they would be equally valid.
If one found out that Newton was actually a terrible murderer, the Earth would continue to orbit the Sun predictably in line with his peer reviewed equations.
<quoted text>
Exactly, and what one does in a certain minute of time, will not either validate nor discredit the rest of the million or so minutes of that persons life.

One of the absolute funniest things that I have seen in a while, was just a week or so ago, a Christiain group reneged on a contract with Duck Dynasty's Willie Robertson, because he had a sponsorship deal with some winery. Clearly no one associated, in any way with "wine" could be the inspiration for their group. Would it be out of line to suggest a bible lesson, on scripture, where Jesus actually made himself into wine maker?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Heaven 2 hr Reason Personified 44
Our world came from nothing? 2 hr Reason Personified 1,107
Man center of the universe. 2 hr Reason Personified 159
Evidence for God! 3 hr Uncle Sam 51
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 3 hr Dave Nelson 231,016
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 15 hr fadu singh 23,043
Former Atheist Academic Who Rejected God and Be... 22 hr Hooogle It 77

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE