Can anyone Prove there is no God?

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#97 Aug 20, 2013
PMan dies, comes back to life, what he saw - YouTube
http://m.youtube.com/watch...
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

#98 Aug 20, 2013
The Real Goose wrote:
PMan dies, comes back to life, what he saw - YouTube
http://m.youtube.com/watch...
I've seen this. I am not too sure if I believe in such things because the Bible indicates that the moment we die we are present with Jesus, but if it helps people to find true salvation then good for him!
Crolath

Palo Cedro, CA

#99 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
See my longer prior post.
How can something imaginary be cruel or immoral? You atheists DO realize that it is illogical to argue against something that is not real, right? Kinda like arguing that Santa is mean because he didn't bring you the new toy truck you wanted for your birthday! And don't even try to twist this to make is sound like I am agreeing that God is make-believe! That is NOT my belief at all.
I can't speak for everyone, but I would say the same sorts of things to someone who adores and worships Lord Voldemort. And if that nutjob was quoting the Harry Potter books to back up bis claim, I would quote those books right back at him to show him old Voldy is NOT a nice guy.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#101 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>They ARE doing just that! The group that is pushing their religion down our kids' throats is atheists, and their religion is evolution and long ages.

Atheists are also getting God removed from everything governmental as well. They ARE trying to dictate what we can believe through legislation such as Obamacare. Look at the persecution of Christianity in Egypt and even here in America!
The constitution states that there should be a separation of church and state...religion does not belong in the government. That doesn't mean that someone can't be a christian, it simply means that it shouldn't be in the government.
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

#102 Aug 20, 2013
Decade_in_Ruin wrote:
Oh great I knew you would say Catholics are not Christians. That is desperation. Your entire Christian cult franchise is based on catholic and you can not become an ordained priest without the Catholic Church permission. Ask any ordained priest. Go to any Christian school and ask. But get your head out of your ass and youight learn something. But I doubt it.
We are not based on Catholicism. Catholicism resulted from a mixture of Christianity and Roman paganism. There is no such thing as a Christian priest. Why would I ask a priest anything about it, or a Catholic school? They will obviously tell you what they believe. Would you ask a abortionist why is wrong to abort babies a pothead why it's wrong to smoke pot? And I am the one whose head is....never mind!
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

#103 Aug 20, 2013
I_see_you wrote:
<quoted text>
The constitution states that there should be a separation of church and state...religion does not belong in the government. That doesn't mean that someone can't be a christian, it simply means that it shouldn't be in the government.
Please find where is says anything about separation of church and state in the Constitution. Don't bother, you won't find it because it is not there. What it does say is this:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an (establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof); or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Notice the part I highlighted with parentheses. That means that the gov. cannot stick its nose into religion's business, NOTHING ELSE!

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#104 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>Please find where is says anything about separation of church and state in the Constitution. Don't bother, you won't find it because it is not there. What it does say is this:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an (establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof); or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Notice the part I highlighted with parentheses. That means that the gov. cannot stick its nose into religion's business, NOTHING ELSE!
I stand corrected. Was there really a need for the all caps?

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#105 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>Please find where is says anything about separation of church and state in the Constitution. Don't bother, you won't find it because it is not there. What it does say is this:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an (establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof); or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Notice the part I highlighted with parentheses. That means that the gov. cannot stick its nose into religion's business, NOTHING ELSE!
Laws made by congress that are religious based should not be allowed.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#106 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW! You really have fallen for the hype. Exactly how are we so evil?
Anti-gay laws passed because of you ugly True Believers™.

Anti-women too.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
How do we hate?
See above.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
abuse kids?
You tell kids lies-- that's abuse.

But what's worse? Your **leaders** have systematically raped kids for many-many years-- and your churches cover it all up.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
abuse women?
See above-- your ugly religion is behind ANTI-WOMEN laws limiting abortions, limiting women's contraceptives, limiting women's health clinics.

Just for starters.

Even worse? Your ugly cult teaches women they are SECOND CLASS, behind men.

That's horrid!
FollowerofChrist wrote:
You do realize that most of the facilities out there to HELP women and children are religious institutions, right?!
By **ABUSING** them? By **DENYING** them rights?
FollowerofChrist wrote:
Planned Parenthood may help a lot of women with things other than abortion, but considering they perform hundreds of thousands of them a years, they should really change their names to Planned Fetal Genocide!
See?

You prove my points yourself...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#107 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, science comes from the Latin word "scientia" meaning "knowledge."
Yes--- something you ugly hate-cultists have been suppressing for thousands of years.

And counting...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#108 Aug 20, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
So, if I created, say, a thinking, self-willed robot, I shouldn't be allowed to dictate its behavior and actions? I shouldn't be able to provide it with rules designed to help keep it out of trouble and to get along with others of its kind? It's not quite the same, obviously, but the creator certainly has EVERY right to make up His own rules (and God set them up thousands of years ago, not "as He goes along").
Your entire "argument"?

IS ONE OF MIGHT MAKES RIGHT.

Here's a clue-- might DOES NOT make it right.

Just because you CAN?

Does not mean you should...!
Thinking

Royston, UK

#109 Aug 21, 2013
I note you are OK with being called a mental.
Decade_in_Ruin wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously
Is
That
The
Best
You
Can
Do
I am on a IPhone so it tends to take a life all it's own. But that is besides the point.
You are going to resort to typing and spelling because you can't give profe to discredit me. Dude get out of the playground.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#110 Aug 21, 2013
With robots all things are possible.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, how could the robot I made be my god?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#111 Aug 21, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
See my longer prior post.
How can something imaginary be cruel or immoral?
That is the basis of many fictional stories.
You atheists DO realize that it is illogical to argue against something that is not real, right?
Not when there are so many who believe in the things that are not real.
Kinda like arguing that Santa is mean because he didn't bring you the new toy truck you wanted for your birthday!
Hey,*you* are the one that believes in Santa here. We are simply pointing out that he isn't who you claim.
And don't even try to twist this to make is sound like I am agreeing that God is make-believe! That is NOT my belief at all.
You belief is a myth. I know you don't believe that, but it is. Furthermore, the deity you believe in, and therefore the morals you adhere to, are evil.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#112 Aug 21, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Please find where is says anything about separation of church and state in the Constitution. Don't bother, you won't find it because it is not there. What it does say is this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an (establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof); or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Notice the part I highlighted with parentheses. That means that the gov. cannot stick its nose into religion's business, NOTHING ELSE!
If only religion would return the favor.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#113 Aug 21, 2013
FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you are wrong! And you absolutely ARE blaming Christianity for non-Christian wrongs. The inquisitions were committed by Catholicism, and those persecuted were the real Christians. So you think it would be ok to blame all people named Fred just because many people with the name Fred have done wrong? It would sure be nice if one of you hateful misotheists would use some logic!
Catholicism chose which books would be in your Bible.
spudgun

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#114 Aug 21, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Catholicism chose which books would be in your Bible.
An overlooked point. The first bible was put together in the 4th century.

"In 331, Constantine I commissioned Eusebius to deliver fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople. Athanasius (Apol. Const. 4) recorded Alexandrian scribes around 340 preparing Bibles for Constans. Little else is known, though there is plenty of speculation. For example, it is speculated that this may have provided motivation for canon lists, and that Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus may be examples of these Bibles."

Prior to that the some early christians had copies of individual books on scrolls.

So called Bible-only christians are generally unaware that none of the early Christians had Bibles. Only after 300 years was the first ones put together, and these were owned only by the select few in the Roman empire.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#115 Aug 21, 2013
Thinking wrote:
With robots all things are possible.
<quoted text>
The computer game Deus Ex Machina deals with the very idea of robots-becoming-god.

It's a very good game, by the way.

:)

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#116 Aug 21, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Catholicism chose which books would be in your Bible.
More specifically, Constantine and his **army** did that.

:)

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#117 Aug 21, 2013
spudgun wrote:
<quoted text>
An overlooked point. The first bible was put together in the 4th century.
"In 331, Constantine I commissioned Eusebius to deliver fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople. Athanasius (Apol. Const. 4) recorded Alexandrian scribes around 340 preparing Bibles for Constans. Little else is known, though there is plenty of speculation. For example, it is speculated that this may have provided motivation for canon lists, and that Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus may be examples of these Bibles."
Prior to that the some early christians had copies of individual books on scrolls.
So called Bible-only christians are generally unaware that none of the early Christians had Bibles. Only after 300 years was the first ones put together, and these were owned only by the select few in the Roman empire.
Well, Ignorance of History **is** a hallmark of your typical True Believer™ after all.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 1 min Dogen 1,499
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... 1 hr Baffled 1,179
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr Eagle 12 - 32,463
How To Get To Heaven When You Die (Jan '17) Tue Ben Avraham 100
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) Aug 21 Dogen 78,757
what science will NEVER be able to prove Aug 11 Eagle 12 - 5
News What Ever Happened to the New Atheists?by Ellio... Aug 7 nanoanomaly 1
More from around the web