Can anyone Prove there is no God?

Posted in the Atheism Forum

Comments (Page 13)

Showing posts 241 - 260 of331
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#260
Sep 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lelouch0 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey there, Bob. Busy fighting the trolls again, I see. I've been taking a bit of a break away from Topix. I've mainly been busy writing things.:D I felt like I should drop in here every now and again and say hi to my friends.....
Hello!

Happy you've found something worthy of your time. I wish you luck in your writing.

Since: Jul 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#261
Sep 3, 2013
 
mark

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#262
Sep 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as every argument that evo/origins makes is based on the initial premise of long ages, which also requires faith.
Religious liar.evolution is based on facts not faith. Wy do creationist lie again and again.

They base their beliefs on such crap!!'
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#263
Sep 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious liar.evolution is based on facts not faith. Wy do creationist lie again and again.
They base their beliefs on such crap!!'
Ok, let's have one "fact" that proves evolution on the microbes-to-man scale (not speciation, so don't offer "ring species" or e-coli, etc.).
EdSed

Wishaw, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#264
Sep 3, 2013
 
According to a 2008 Gallup poll only 4% of US Republicans believed in 'evolution without god'. A similar figure for the UK was 48% in 2006. 42% of Australians believe in a "wholly scientific" explanation for the origins of life.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support...

I'll leave folk to decide who are the most collectively stupid, US Republicans or UK citizens.

Source = Wiki. Not that too much weight should be given to such polls. For instance, I suspect some people may just say the most stupid option they're offered out of disgust at being asked such a stupid question.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#265
Sep 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, let's have one "fact" that proves evolution on the microbes-to-man scale (not speciation, so don't offer "ring species" or e-coli, etc.).
Tell ya what. When you hold the same amount of skepticism for your own religion as you do evolution, then we can talk.

But then again thats a misstatement as creationists arent actually "skeptical" about evolution. Since it refutes their religion,(but doesn't get rid of the possibility of a god) they just dismiss it out of hand and put their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA LA!! to any evidence presented to them.
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#267
Sep 3, 2013
 
gotnatas wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell ya what. When you hold the same amount of skepticism for your own religion as you do evolution, then we can talk.
But then again thats a misstatement as creationists arent actually "skeptical" about evolution. Since it refutes their religion,(but doesn't get rid of the possibility of a god) they just dismiss it out of hand and put their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA LA!! to any evidence presented to them.
I was responding to more of a religion-oriented posting, as I recall; however, I am not skeptical about evolution because it refutes God's word, because it does not do so. I am skeptical about evolution and long ages because they fly in the face of reason! Everything can only have come into existence through one of three possible ways: 1. an intellect created it all; 2. everything always existed; or 3. everything came from nothing. Now, science has already ruled out number 2. Number three is a logical impossibility, so....
xianity is EVIL

Windsor, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#268
Sep 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

JesusMyKing wrote:
People keep asking us to prove there is a God.
People have believed in God for centuries, then science comes along and says there is no God.
The burden of proof is on science.
Can anyone prove there is no God?
science says NO such thing

youre LYING
xianity is EVIL

Windsor, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#269
Sep 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
I was responding to more of a religion-oriented posting, as I recall; however, I am not skeptical about evolution because it refutes God's word, because it does not do so. I am skeptical about evolution and long ages because they fly in the face of reason! Everything can only have come into existence through one of three possible ways: 1. an intellect created it all; 2. everything always existed; or 3. everything came from nothing. Now, science has already ruled out number 2. Number three is a logical impossibility, so....
science never did rule out that everything always existed

youre LYING ,,why do you xians LIE so much?

http://youtu.be/nZiROWO6iVs

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#270
Sep 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
I was responding to more of a religion-oriented posting, as I recall; however, I am not skeptical about evolution because it refutes God's word, because it does not do so. I am skeptical about evolution and long ages because they fly in the face of reason! Everything can only have come into existence through one of three possible ways: 1. an intellect created it all; 2. everything always existed; or 3. everything came from nothing. Now, science has already ruled out number 2. Number three is a logical impossibility, so....
Still flexing your 'stupid' I see

BTW... you have believe that there is a 'god'. That belief REQUIRES 'faith' because there is no evidence to support that belief. Using your belief as a starting point to apply 'reason' to ANY situation only shows that you and 'reason' have never met.
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#271
Sep 4, 2013
 
xianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
science never did rule out that everything always existed
youre LYING ,,why do you xians LIE so much?
http://youtu.be/nZiROWO6iVs
Among other things, the theory of relativity rules it out. If the universe is expanding and began as an infinitesimally small singularity that exploded, then it must have "begun." And why do people such as yourself rely on this "liar liar" foolishness? People who call others "liars" do so because they themselves are so lost in their own lies! It's called transference. Check it out.
FollowerofChrist

Fairmont, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#272
Sep 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>Still flexing your 'stupid' I see
BTW... you have believe that there is a 'god'. That belief REQUIRES 'faith' because there is no evidence to support that belief. Using your belief as a starting point to apply 'reason' to ANY situation only shows that you and 'reason' have never met.
So glad to see you can understand the concept. Now, just look in the mirror and see who else has no evidence but "believes" just the same!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#273
Sep 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, let's have one "fact" that proves evolution on the microbes-to-man scale (not speciation, so don't offer "ring species" or e-coli, etc.).
How about 1000's of facts instead?

Proof of evolution: http://www.talkorigins.org/

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#274
Sep 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
Among other things, the theory of relativity rules it out.
False. You clearly are unacquainted with physics OR relativity.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
If the universe is expanding and began as an infinitesimally small singularity that exploded, then it must have "begun."
In it's **current** phase, sure. What was it prior to that? It could easily have existed as some prior form.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
And why do people such as yourself rely on this "liar liar" foolishness? People who call others "liars" do so because they themselves are so lost in their own lies! It's called transference. Check it out.
Faith is a lie you tell yourself often enough, you forgot it was a lie.

Why do you think you are compelled to RENEW THE LIE on a biweekly basis?

You **must** renew the lie, or you start to remember...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#275
Sep 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
So glad to see you can understand the concept. Now, just look in the mirror and see who else has no evidence but "believes" just the same!
That would be ... you.

And everyone like you who claims "god" is real.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#276
Sep 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

WOW. No one validates your argument quit like a creationist lol.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
I am not skeptical about evolution because it refutes God's word, because it does not do so. I am skeptical about evolution and long ages because they fly in the face of reason.
No god has been show to exist yet, let alone any of its "words". NO religion has been validated, but evolution has been!!

See, nobody gets thing backwords quit like a creationist.
FollowerofChrist wrote:
Everything can only have come into existence through one of three possible ways: 1. an intellect created it all; 2. everything always existed; or 3. everything came from nothing. Now, science has already ruled out number 2. Number three is a logical impossibility, so....
Well now your just making stuff up. You have no idea what science has ruled out. Well it did inadvertently rule out the literal interpretation of your religion, but HEY!! tell ya what. How about we try an experiment shall we?? Lets just make up a bunch bullshit and lie really really really hard ok, and lets see if it makes it true shall we??

You've brilliantly demonstrated my point. Creationists aren't "skeptical". See, actual skepticism takes balls. Its the ability to say "I could be wrong", and to think "what would show the inaccuracies of what im thinking about, and what would refute it". Creationism completely void of this as you and countless others have shown.

Heres something to ponder.

If you have to bullshit your way through a conversation, then your wrong.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#277
Sep 6, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
Among other things, the theory of relativity rules it out. If the universe is expanding and began as an infinitesimally small singularity that exploded, then it must have "begun."
Yet all these theist scientists from around the world aren't churning out the pear reviewed papers of "GAWD did it"!!
FollowerofChrist wrote:
And why do people such as yourself rely on this "liar liar" foolishness? People who call others "liars" do so because they themselves are so lost in their own lies! It's called transference. Check it out.
OOOOOOOOOOH the irony. Its so thick I can barely read your post. Creationists could teach courses at all the top colleges around the world on transference.

Yes, please look into transference lol.

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#278
Sep 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FollowerofChrist wrote:
<quoted text>
So glad to see you can understand the concept. Now, just look in the mirror and see who else has no evidence but "believes" just the same!
Holy shit!! So you admit you make stuff up and dont know what your talking about. And then "transfeeeeer" your dishonesty on to other people.

What kind of person are you??

Fricken creep.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#279
Sep 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

gotnatas wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy shit!! So you admit you make stuff up and dont know what your talking about. And then "transfeeeeer" your dishonesty on to other people.
What kind of person are you??
Fricken creep.
Creep is dead on correct.

A horrid little person for sure.

Since: Jun 13

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#280
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Religious liar.evolution is based on facts not faith. Wy do creationist lie again and again.
They base their beliefs on such crap!!'
Skeptic there beliefs are not based on crap there literally based on nothing. Apart from a fictional book of alleged accounts at best that may or may not have happened there's no proof. It's no different then holding a copy of a Dr. Zesus book and saying everything in it is true and happened just because the book said it does

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 241 - 260 of331
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••