"Your husband shall rule over you”

Posted in the Atheism Forum

Comments (Page 8)

Showing posts 141 - 155 of155
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184
Oct 27, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Which evolution?
1) Cosmic evolution: the origin of time/space/matter from nothing in the supposed “Big Bang”
2) Chemical evolution: all the elements “evolved” from hydrogen
3) Stellar evolution: stars formed from dust clouds
4) Organic evolution: life formed from non-living matter
5) Macro-evolution: plants and animals produce offspring different than their ‘kind’
6) Micro-evolution: variations develop within the kind such as big dogs and little dogs; bacteria becoming resistant to drugs; etc.
Only ONE of these definitions for evolution is true SCIENCE—Number 6. The first five are part of a RELIGION that adherents must “believe” in since they have NEVER been observed or demonstrated. Khatru is guilty of mixing these definitions indiscriminately. He (along with many science books) sees and shows lots of evidence for definition #6 with which I agree, but then ASSUMES that this is evidence for the first five. That is NOT good science, Khatru! The variations we all observe and that every farmer on planet earth understands and uses does NOT offer ANY evidence for the first five definitions of evolution.
This morning I looked out over the back garden and in the snow I could see the paw prints of a cat that had walked across the back lawn.

Then it occurred to me that it may not have been a cat, or indeed, any other animal. Most likely it could have been a guy floating over my garden in a hot-air balloon, using long bamboo poles with plastic cat feet securely attached to the end and making a false trail.

Why would he leave a trail of tracks? Perhaps he wanted to fool me.
It's a good job I realised the truth that no cat made those tracks.

What a discerning mind I must have!

Aren't I just like you? You're not tricked by the fossil trail your god has left which fools people of reason and logic.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#185
Oct 27, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
You still don't know a thing about Christianity. If this was baseball you would be so far off base the stadium would not be big enough.
"You're either with us or your're damned"

That's the Christian mantra. It tells me all I need to know about your hate-filled, divisive belief system.

Anyway, I can't help but notice your complete failure to actually refute me.

Wailing and stamping your feet doesn't count.

The Bible says that women need to have babies if they're to be saved.

Yes or no?

While you're fumbling around looking for an answer, I'll share some more biblical hatred of women....

"And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean. And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And if it be on her bed, or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the even. And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean. And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation; all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she shall be unclean. Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation: and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation. And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean. And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. And the priest shall offer the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness."

Leviticus 15:19-30

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#186
Oct 28, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't worry you would never pass anyways.
You'd be changing your tune, PDQ if the Thuggee were mandating your laws.

Anyway, I have been there, done that. Read the buybull and walked out the door. Imagine what a fu*ktard, is the god who would force a parent to eat their own child. You can have it!

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#187
Oct 28, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope
Yep, that ..... and it's the best tool the spell casters have to keep their wallets, full of your money.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#188
Oct 28, 2012
 
Doctor Who: Creationist troll who lies about science.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#189
Oct 28, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
"You're either with us or your're damned"
That's the Christian mantra. It tells me all I need to know about your hate-filled, divisive belief system.
Anyway, I can't help but notice your complete failure to actually refute me.
Wailing and stamping your feet doesn't count.
The Bible says that women need to have babies if they're to be saved.
Yes or no?
While you're fumbling around looking for an answer, I'll share some more biblical hatred of women....
"And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean. And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And if it be on her bed, or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the even. And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean. And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation; all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she shall be unclean. Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation: and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation. And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean. And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. And the priest shall offer the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness."
Leviticus 15:19-30
Those fellers needed to keep all those women knocked up, or at least keep a few good pigeon/turtle dealers numbers handy.

Damn menstruation, those sinful women, all bleeding regular as clockwork. You'd think they did it just to dirty up the place, now wouldn't you?

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#190
Oct 28, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Mark Hartwig has a Ph.D. in educational psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara, specializing in statistics and research design. He was an early organizer of the intelligent design movement and for 10 years was managing editor of the journal Origins Research, now published as Origins and Design.
His articles on science and science education have appeared in such publications as The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Denver Post, The Houston Chronicle, and many other periodicals. He is the former author of The Wedge Update column, and author of The Intelligent Design FAQ. He also co-authored Invitation to Conflict: A Retrospective Look at the California Science Framework, which argued that the California Science Framework, far from being objective science education guidelines, was a polemical document aimed at silencing dissent in the science classroom—and was riddled with errors astonishing for a state with California's intellectual resources.
So what?

Evolution is not covered by his scientific discipline.

Would you ask a geologist to explain the workings of cell structure in plants?

Of course you wouldn't.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#191
Oct 28, 2012
 
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Those fellers needed to keep all those women knocked up, or at least keep a few good pigeon/turtle dealers numbers handy.
Damn menstruation, those sinful women, all bleeding regular as clockwork. You'd think they did it just to dirty up the place, now wouldn't you?
Lol

It's a disgrace!

How dare those sinful women upset the sensitivities of these religious and deeply pious men!!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#192
Oct 29, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>I've got no problem with whatever you believe in (as long as it's legal)

You think I'm upset lover what you believe?

Seems to me that you have an over-inflated opinion of yourself as I couldn't really care less.
But you do care! It shows in your post.
Another lie by an atheist, what a surprise!

We do know you're not an upset lover. For that you would need a lover.
You're a lonely little soul.

"I've got no problem with whatever you believe in"

Really? Well I guess this will be your last post then.

Bye bye!

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#193
Oct 29, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>How apt that you use the word "illusions" in such close proximity to the word "god".

No doubt you're channelling some hidden vein of unbelief deep within your psyche.
Or not.

Your nose is growing!
Pinocchio what so bad to be a real boy.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#194
Oct 29, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>Ah yes.

Such a wonderful god.

He created smallpox.

Then he ensured millions of men, women, children and babies died painful deaths over tens of thousands of years before letting humanity find a cure.
Well you should love these!
This is the God that will judge you.

19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

American King James Version
And the LORD God said to the serpent, Because you have done this, you are cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; on your belly shall you go, and dust shall you eat all the days of your life:

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#195
Oct 29, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>I looked at this

The article you refer to was written by someone called Mark Hartwig.

I checked his scientific credentials and his expertise is educational psychology in which he holds a PhD.

You must be pretty stupid to prefer his non-knowledge of evolution over the wealth of real knowledge belonging to the many evolutionary and molecular biologists, anatomists, geneticists, etc.

Your choosing Hartwig is a bit like choosing a plumber to rewire your house instead of an electrician.

Dumb,dumb,dumb.

Why doesn't this surprise me?
Mark Hartwig has a Ph.D. in educational psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara, specializing in statistics and research design. He was an early organizer of the intelligent design movement and for 10 years was managing editor of the journal Origins Research, now published as Origins and Design.

His articles on science and science education have appeared in such publications as The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Denver Post, The Houston Chronicle, and many other periodicals. He is the former author of The Wedge Update column, and author of The Intelligent Design FAQ. He also co-authored Invitation to Conflict: A Retrospective Look at the California Science Framework, which argued that the California Science Framework, far from being objective science education guidelines, was a polemical document aimed at silencing dissent in the science classroom—and was riddled with errors astonishing for a state with California's intellectual resources.

Very well qualified.
Facts burning up Pinocchio!
Pinocchio is living in a pipe dream that only he can see. Lol puppet boy LOL

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#196
Oct 29, 2012
 
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>Here are just a few things your religion has:

Dragons, unicorns, giants and cockatrices.

A talking snakes and donkeys.

A flat earth.

Bats that are birds and rabbits that chew the cud.

A divine recipe for shitcakes

Genetically altering goats by floating tree bark in water.

Men with milk in their breasts

Oh yes, let's not forget.... A ratio of 3:1 for Pi

Holy holy holy!
All have been explained significantly enough for a 4 year old to understand yet you don't seem to understand. I guess we can't expect Pinocchio to be equal to a real boy.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#197
Oct 30, 2012
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you should love these!
This is the God that will judge you.
19 Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
American King James Version
And the LORD God said to the serpent, Because you have done this, you are cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; on your belly shall you go, and dust shall you eat all the days of your life:
Bulsh!t, those are just threats from the Ju-Ju men, whose self appointed job it is, to keep you forking over the 10%, that enables them to live well on your dime.

As P.T. Barnim said, there is one born every minute ....

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#198
Oct 30, 2012
 
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
All have been explained significantly enough for a 4 year old to understand yet you don't seem to understand. I guess we can't expect Pinocchio to be equal to a real boy.
It has been glossed over, swept under the rug, ignored and just plain been lied about, but it has not been explained, not in any manner that anyone over 4 years old would believe.

Toddlers are easy to decieve, and it is for that reason the Ju-Ju men made sure that Sunday school exists. The earlier you indoctrinate, the more likely it is to last for life.

An indoctrinated toddler will become an adult with an open wallet. The Ju Ju man banks on that.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 141 - 155 of155
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••