Comments
41 - 60 of 153 Comments Last updated Oct 30, 2012

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Jun 16, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Well I'm not ignoring the OT I'm say the NT frees us from the laws of the OT and how men treated women and had slave was OT and not to be followed to day just like Christians can eat the food that was outlawed in the OT e.g. Pork,
If, were you, I'd stay away from pork products and avoid wearing mixed fibers.

New King James Version (NKJV)

Matthew 5:17-19

17.Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Can you say Cafeteria Christain?
redneck

Glendale, OR

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Jun 18, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all do.
I don't I would prefer a different the marriage but that's just me being old school if Gay get married I think the should get all the same benifits as any marryed couple. By the way I have some very good friends that are gay and others that are bi. There are the same trends all over in nature therefor it natural not unnatural.
In the bible of Playa Norte, Jesus was bisexual. Is that possible?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Jun 18, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Like that?
Kind of a dumb question after all he made it.
Not the human reproductive system, he didn't. He made something that cleaned itself up twice as fast, if it had been inhabited by a male fetus, rather than a female. He made something that a pregnancy's results hinged on what the copulating pair were viewing while engaged in coitus. That does not add up to any actual reproductive system. And the god of gonads and pretty, pretty peni, would shit himself if he knew that all humans begin as female in the womb.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Jun 18, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes can you also say
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.”(John 3:16-18 ESV)
Sure, that holds true, unless somewhere in the past nine generations of your family, somebody sired, conceived or birthed a bastard, then every last one of that entire bloodline, for ten generations back, burns.

Did no one in your history, get married less than nine months before a baby was born? Is every daddy, really the daddy? Was their any miscarriages, lost , or any man's sperm leavings, that managed to develop into a child?
Of course there was, somewhere back there. People are human, and those bastards have doomed the next few hundred years of that entire family, to hell.

You will be in good company though, Jewsus will be there, he is a bastard after all.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Jun 24, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
You're really hung up on the OT.
Look to the NT
All liars know how to misdirect. How about you explain the crap in the OT, before moving on to the NT?

A little honesty please?
Amused

Lowell, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Jun 25, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
You're really hung up on the OT.
Look to the NT
The NT is a non-sequiter without the OT. Unless you believe the story of the fall of man in Eden, you don't believe in original sin. If you don't believe all of mankind is tainted by the sin of Adam and Eve, the need to atone for the original sin through a sacrificial offering is incomprehensible nonsense. No original sin = no need for the sacrifice on the cross.

The authors of the new testament took great care (and great liberty with the facts) to get the narrative of the NT to accord with predictions of the OT, precisely because without the OT, the NT makes no sense. If you disregard the OT, explain why the sacrifice that is the central point of the NT is even necessary.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Jun 25, 2012
 
Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
The NT is a non-sequiter without the OT. Unless you believe the story of the fall of man in Eden, you don't believe in original sin. If you don't believe all of mankind is tainted by the sin of Adam and Eve, the need to atone for the original sin through a sacrificial offering is incomprehensible nonsense. No original sin = no need for the sacrifice on the cross.
The authors of the new testament took great care (and great liberty with the facts) to get the narrative of the NT to accord with predictions of the OT, precisely because without the OT, the NT makes no sense. If you disregard the OT, explain why the sacrifice that is the central point of the NT is even necessary.
And there are numerous references to the factual truth of the OT in the NT. So to deny the OT means you still have to be a cafeteria Christian when reading the NT.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Jun 25, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
I do see this side also but then why should man be head of house maybe before a marriage the couple should take an IQ test and the smarter one becomes the head of house.
That goes directly against the teaching of the NT.

"The Bible and the Church have been the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of women's emancipation." ~ Elizabeth Cady Stanton

It is now quite lawful for a Catholic woman to avoid pregnancy by a resort to mathematics, though she is still forbidden to resort to physics or chemistry.~H.L. Mencken

Congress is still trying to control female reproductive rights.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Jun 25, 2012
 
BUDDHA BUDDY wrote:
<quoted text>
No one needs to follow your rules.
Not denying just understanding is correct place in Christian believe.
Typical Rouge by a Satan lead arrogant
Immature Atheist.
Well, thank you for the immediate rush judgement of me. You shining example of what it means to be a Christian is noted.

Satan would be part of your mythology. This is the 21st century. Do you really still believe in demons and being possessed by evil spirits?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Jun 25, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey I'm studying the Bible and when you come across something like the stuff I posted here you question it. It's not holy this stuff. It is how life use to be
But not now and not in the NT. Jesus respected women and as a Jewish Rabi he by Jewish law he had to be married.
Although the bible brush over this its still must have been. Be careful of religion not of God.
No it's not how life used to be. This is threats from the buybull god. I know you are going to only reference the buybull, but there are other holy tomes in which Jesus, says that he will teach Mary to be male, so that she too, can enter heaven. For a woman to enter heaven she must be taught to be male, sounds fair to me. After all it is Jehovah's heaven, and he is heavy into an all male universe.

Dude, the bridegroom cometh and you are the bride of Christ.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Jun 25, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
You're really hung up on the OT.
Look to the NT
Are you suggesting that I ignore this? >>>

New King James Version (NKJV)

Matthew 5:17-19

17.“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Sep 6, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
No don't ignore that.
Just make sure it's ok with your hubby.
"Ephesians 5: Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior"
Yeah, the whole thing is a load of crap, isn't it.
But if you are a beleiver, you don't get to throw bits and pieces out. It's the whole filthy ball of wax, or nothing.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Sep 8, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Now the other side of the coin:
"Where in the Bible does it say men are women's helpers:
It doesn't. But no matter, I don't know, and don't care. I don't remember making any statement to that effect, in fact I think that the sooner every last page of that filthy tome, has been used to wipe backsides free of fecal matter, the better. Here is to a cleaner better world, free of the buybulls crap.

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Oct 18, 2012
 
There is a good reason for why the bible
Says men shall rule their household.

And that reason is women.
Once Bitten

Sioux City, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Oct 18, 2012
 
Langoliers wrote:
There is a good reason for why the bible
Says men shall rule their household.

And that reason is women.
I hear you man!:)

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Oct 19, 2012
 
Once Bitten wrote:
<quoted text>
I hear you man!:)
He didn't say anything .... there was no reason given. Are you two voids, saying that the penis is the reason that the male should be given power?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Oct 19, 2012
 
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
Now the other side of the coin:
"Where in the Bible does it say men are women's helpers:
Actually, where in the Bible does it ever show women making the decisions. From what I've read the wives hardly ever do. It goes without say that in any relationship someone has to have the final say unless you think married couples should do whatever they want. For instance, let's say a married couple is moving. The husband wants to move to New York, and the wife wants to move to San Diego. Do they just get a divorce? If that's the case, why would God have created marriage in the first place. The Bible says that it is not good for a man to be alone, so God made him a helper! He didn't say he made the woman a helper. Yes the woman is supposed to submit, but, and I say but, the man is not supposed to abuse her, or order her around like a dog. She is supposed to take pride in helping her husband with whatever he needs. Otherwise we end up with a bunch of broken marriages, and broken homes like we have today. Women are not being men's helpers anymore, but instead are becoming their competitors, and and it is tearing families apart. "
Well since the family, is "his wishes and his needs", and the woman having a voice is what is tearing the families apart, surely your god should have for seen this little problem, and created woman from a man's rib or something like that, so there wouldn't be any chance of him having a thought processor. And yes, "him", clones don't change sex. Eve was a man, biblically speaking

The bible has no clue as to what a woman, is, and it seems neither do you.

Also family choices should be made, by the family and for the family, and in absolutely most cases the woman is the one who knows what the family needs.

"Wants" should almost never factor into the equasion, or if they do it's the very last bit of almost trivial data to be applied.
Once Bitten

Sioux City, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Oct 19, 2012
 
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Well since the family, is "his wishes and his needs", and the woman having a voice is what is tearing the families apart, surely your god should have for seen this little problem, and created woman from a man's rib or something like that, so there wouldn't be any chance of him having a thought processor. And yes, "him", clones don't change sex. Eve was a man, biblically speaking

The bible has no clue as to what a woman, is, and it seems neither do you.

Also family choices should be made, by the family and for the family, and in absolutely most cases the woman is the one who knows what the family needs.

"Wants" should almost never factor into the equasion, or if they do it's the very last bit of almost trivial data to be applied.
The family is dead.
Couples should sign a 5 year mating agreement that is renewable. Marriage should just go away. Everything kept separate, Kids would be all predetermined on who raises them and when each one gets them. Child support starts on day one.
Chuckles

Wylie, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Oct 19, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Langoliers wrote:
There is a good reason for why the bible
Says men shall rule their household.
And that reason is women.
Yet the Biblegod, Yahweh, is a complete fucktard. He inseminated Mary, had her squat like a heifer in a filthy manger to squirt out Jesus-Who-Was-Also-Himself, when the Lord could have inseminated JOSEPH and had a MAN birth Christ through much manly macho grunting! With God ALL things are possible including MEN who both birth and breastfeed! After all, the laws of nature are suspended! Hallelujah! Yahweh-the-Yahoo left the FATE of humanity in the vulva of a female as opposed to the male groin. A virgin birth? Hahahahaha! That miracle was SOOOO overdone by the time the Bronze Age rolled around! If Yahweh had really believed in the superiority of MEN, he could have had a very pregnant Joseph running around Jerusalem's temple and showing off his bellyfruit to the entire Sanhedrin. It would have been a fabulous freak show, one of Yahweh's best. Manger scenes today would depict a hairy Middle Eastern guy in a robe with dangling teats, open nipples, and an infant suckling the divine nectar. Indeed, Yahweh should have chosen JOSEPH to birth. Way cool! Glory!
Monkeys Paw

Sioux City, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Oct 19, 2012
 
Once Bitten wrote:
<quoted text>The family is dead.
Couples should sign a 5 year mating agreement that is renewable. Marriage should just go away. Everything kept separate, Kids would be all predetermined on who raises them and when each one gets them. Child support starts on day one.
I like that!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

6 Users are viewing the Atheism Forum right now

Search the Atheism Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 4 min Rosa_Winkel 224,353
Our world came from nothing? 6 hr NightSerf 240
20+ Questions for Theists (Apr '13) 9 hr Patrick 385
What does "Atheism" mean? 11 hr Reason Personified 10
Introducing The Universal Religion 12 hr Reason Personified 733
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 16 hr DonPanic 21,400
Talking some sense into you people... 18 hr religionisillness 24
•••
•••