My Child, The Atheist

Mar 29, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Catholic Digest

It's 11:00 p.m. Do you know where your atheist child is? An alarming number of Catholic parents these days have seen their deepest fear come true.

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of187
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Thinking

Leeds, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

But many fiddle with the basic god template until it hates the same shit they do.
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"He" didn't make up the Christian god, he's just a follower.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Irony that atheist spend so much time talking about God and themselves.
Its because we're surrounded by people who shove it in our faces, like you.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

2

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
F*ck off you faker there are no sides. There's only mutual reality. And in that reality there is no such thing as god and never has been.
You don't represent athiests or speak for them and neither do I. Foolish troll twit.
Gee, for awhile there I thought you were the executive secretary of the Ministry of Truth.

xD

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Theists invent god and opress atheists with it first, then ask atheists "why you always taking about god?".

Its a bit like segregation in the 60s. White people probably thought to themselves, "why do black people complain about using different loos, and being beaten on the streets?"

It's because people like you are ignorant scum.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>"He" didn't make up the Christian god, he's just a follower.
That's what followers do - make up stuff to follow you stupid twit.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Gee, for awhile there I thought you were the executive secretary of the Ministry of Truth.
xD
Oh look its a another comment from you with no proof of god in it.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
Theists invent god and opress atheists with it first, then ask atheists "why you always taking about god?".
Its a bit like segregation in the 60s. White people probably thought to themselves, "why do black people complain about using different loos, and being beaten on the streets?"
It's because people like you are ignorant scum.
So what's your excuse for being ignorant scum?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
F*ck off you faker there are no sides. There's only mutual reality. And in that reality there is no such thing as god and never has been.
You don't represent athiests or speak for them and neither do I. Foolish troll twit.
Didn't claim to.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>And then there are those who claim to be atheists but let slip they believe in the supernatural. That is lying too.
Not necessarily. Atheism simply refers to a lack of belief in deities. An atheist can still believe in any other supernatural stuff which may not necessarily have any bearing on Gods, such as witches, magical fairies, ghosts, or psychic powers or some such.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Not necessarily. Atheism simply refers to a lack of belief in deities. An atheist can still believe in any other supernatural stuff which may not necessarily have any bearing on Gods, such as witches, magical fairies, ghosts, or psychic powers or some such.
How convenient that those "supernatural" entities' existence doesn't rely on empirical evidence for you to believe in them but a "god" does. That's almost amusing.
Thinking

Leeds, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Mar 31, 2013
 
What name do you think an Atheist that doesn't believe in any sort of woo should use?
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Not necessarily. Atheism simply refers to a lack of belief in deities. An atheist can still believe in any other supernatural stuff which may not necessarily have any bearing on Gods, such as witches, magical fairies, ghosts, or psychic powers or some such.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Not necessarily. Atheism simply refers to a lack of belief in deities. An atheist can still believe in any other supernatural stuff which may not necessarily have any bearing on Gods, such as witches, magical fairies, ghosts, or psychic powers or some such.
That's true. Because most of us reject deities out of an intelligent skepticism, it's all too easy to assume that all atheists do as well, but I've met atheists whose rejection is more about rebellion or emotional reaction to the theists in their lives. Not all atheists are as self-aware as the regulars on this forum.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Thinking wrote:
What name do you think an Atheist that doesn't believe in any sort of woo should use?
<quoted text>
Skeptic.
Thinking

Leeds, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

I guess my issue with that word is that it may sound as though you are negative about all matters, and I'm definitely not that.

I do think of myself as a scientific or empirical sceptic but sometimes that gets misconstrued to imply I'm sceptical about science in general.

Maybe we are not destined to have a neutral sounding label! j/k
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>Skeptic.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>How convenient that those "supernatural" entities' existence doesn't rely on empirical evidence for you to believe in them but a "god" does. That's almost amusing.
Did I say that I took supernatural entities seriously?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Thinking wrote:
What name do you think an Atheist that doesn't believe in any sort of woo should use?
<quoted text>
Probably the one given to them by their parents.

Unless it's really bad, then Deed-poll is always an option.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

No president will ever be an atheist.
None even considered
Thinking

Leeds, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Ever?

Bollocks.

Chile's already had a publicly Agnostic President.
Lincoln wrote:
No president will ever be an atheist.
None even considered

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Mar 31, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Thinking wrote:
I guess my issue with that word is that it may sound as though you are negative about all matters, and I'm definitely not that.
I do think of myself as a scientific or empirical sceptic but sometimes that gets misconstrued to imply I'm sceptical about science in general.
Maybe we are not destined to have a neutral sounding label! j/k
<quoted text>
The defining quality of a skeptic is not negativity but the avoidance of unnecessary assumptions, of questioning ideas before accepting or rejection them. Wikipedai puts it thus:

Skepticism or scepticism (see spelling differences) is generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts,[1] or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere.[2]

Philosophical skepticism is an overall approach that requires all information to be well supported by evidence.[3] Classical philosophical skepticism derives from the 'Skeptikoi', a school who "asserted nothing".[4] Adherents of Pyrrhonism, for instance, suspend judgment in investigations.[5] Skeptics may even doubt the reliability of their own senses.[6] Religious skepticism, on the other hand is "doubt concerning basic religious principles (such as immortality, providence, and revelation)".[7]

Skeptics, then, require that ideas be supported by all available evidence before they are accepted as valid or true, even on a provisional basis. If readers or listeners jump to the conclusion that you are negative about all matters, the solution is to define skepticism for them rather than drop the word's use unless you can find another word that defines the approach to knowledge better.
Thinking

Leeds, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Apr 1, 2013
 
I read that article. It's very useful and allowed me to self identify as a scientific or empirical sceptic.
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>The defining quality of a skeptic is not negativity but the avoidance of unnecessary assumptions, of questioning ideas before accepting or rejection them. Wikipedai puts it thus:
Skepticism or scepticism (see spelling differences) is generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts,[1] or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere.[2]
Philosophical skepticism is an overall approach that requires all information to be well supported by evidence.[3] Classical philosophical skepticism derives from the 'Skeptikoi', a school who "asserted nothing".[4] Adherents of Pyrrhonism, for instance, suspend judgment in investigations.[5] Skeptics may even doubt the reliability of their own senses.[6] Religious skepticism, on the other hand is "doubt concerning basic religious principles (such as immortality, providence, and revelation)".[7]
Skeptics, then, require that ideas be supported by all available evidence before they are accepted as valid or true, even on a provisional basis. If readers or listeners jump to the conclusion that you are negative about all matters, the solution is to define skepticism for them rather than drop the word's use unless you can find another word that defines the approach to knowledge better.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of187
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••