Introduction to Modern Christian Apologetics

May 2, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Examiner.com

In September of 2001 a group of terrorists claiming connections to Islam hijacked and crashed several planes into key locations within the USA.

Comments
1 - 19 of 19 Comments Last updated May 16, 2013

“Handsome white and black men”

Since: Jan 10

Interracial love

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

I was unable to open the link, but I will say that xtians will make any excuse for their barbaric god.

Since: Sep 10

Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

All atrocities throughout history were perpetrated by absolutist ideologies, by assholes who said, "We're right, you're wrong, therefore we can kill you."

That's true of every political ideology (communism, fascism, etc.) and it's true of every religious ideology (christian, jew, muslim, hindu, buddhist, etc.).

Religion IS ideology, regardless of any lies told to the contrary.

.
Amused

Lancaster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

emperorjohn wrote:
I was unable to open the link, but I will say that xtians will make any excuse for their barbaric god.
I did open it.There's 5 minutes of my life I won't get back. As is typical of Examiner.com , I feel stupider just for having read the article. Just a re-hash of things we've seen here thousands of times already.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
I did open it.There's 5 minutes of my life I won't get back. As is typical of Examiner.com , I feel stupider just for having read the article. Just a re-hash of things we've seen here thousands of times already.
I was amused that the authors considered the new rise of anti-theism to be "a good thing for christianity".

Really? A rise of logical rebuttal to your ancient cult of superstitious nonsense, is good for you?

<laughing>

I do so love the use of the word "apologetics"... and that they mean "defense of christianity".

Here's a question: why would anything backed by ... a GOD?

Require defending?

<laughing still>
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 8, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

1

Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I was amused that the authors considered the new rise of anti-theism to be "a good thing for christianity".
Really? A rise of logical rebuttal to your ancient cult of superstitious nonsense, is good for you?
<laughing>
I do so love the use of the word "apologetics"... and that they mean "defense of christianity".
Here's a question: why would anything backed by ... a GOD?
Require defending?
<laughing still>
talking to himself again :-)
<laughing to himself>
Of course no evidence for his OPINIONS

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
talking to himself again :-)
<laughing to himself>
Of course no evidence for his OPINIONS
Coming form the defeated theist troll with no proof of god.

So desperate that he must attack atheists, showing his true religious colours to all..

“Handsome white and black men”

Since: Jan 10

Interracial love

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
talking to himself again :-)
<laughing to himself>
Of course no evidence for his OPINIONS
His evidence is the lack of appearance or evidence of your God in any form throughout world history.

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Nothing creates... Nothing

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

emperorjohn wrote:
I was unable to open the link, but I will say that xtians will make any excuse for their barbaric god.
Yes, someone who saved us is barbaric, do you need the definition of barbaric?
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
His evidence is the lack of appearance or evidence of your God in any form throughout world history.
He makes claims
He needs the proof
So far just humor

“Handsome white and black men”

Since: Jan 10

Interracial love

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
He makes claims
He needs the proof
So far just humor
He has all the proof he needs and he has stated them. Your God is not present ina nay form, therefore we must assume that he does not exist. The same assumption that we have in regards to Unicorns and Gargoyles. When your god appears,we will change our opinion.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
He has all the proof he needs and he has stated them. Your God is not present ina nay form, therefore we must assume that he does not exist. The same assumption that we have in regards to Unicorns and Gargoyles. When your god appears,we will change our opinion.
My God ........

You know Nothing of my beliefs

I am a poster on the atheist forum.
Many of the atheist posts are pretentious and moronic.
So far in a few years atheists have proved nothing except their lack of tolerance.
Amused

Lancaster, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 9, 2013
 
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, someone who saved us is barbaric, do you need the definition of barbaric?
Robben Island, in your native S.A. That's a fairly good working definition.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
May 9, 2013
 
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, someone who saved us is barbaric, do you need the definition of barbaric?
Brain damage. There is no getting around this: you have religious brain damage.

So severe, you cannot learn anything.

Pathetic.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
May 9, 2013
 
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Brain damage. There is no getting around this: you have religious brain damage.
So severe, you cannot learn anything.
Pathetic.
Don't be so modest about your own ----- damage.

13,000+ posts are the evidence

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
May 9, 2013
 
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
He has all the proof he needs and he has stated them. Your God is not present ina nay form, therefore we must assume that he does not exist. The same assumption that we have in regards to Unicorns and Gargoyles. When your god appears,we will change our opinion.
Indeed-- all we ask for is a little proof of god's existing.

Obviously, that is just too much for these brain-damaged folk.

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Nothing creates... Nothing

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
May 11, 2013
 
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Brain damage. There is no getting around this: you have religious brain damage.
So severe, you cannot learn anything.
Pathetic.
You're brain damage is now so severe you think I have brain damage.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
May 11, 2013
 
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
You're brain damage is now so severe you think I have brain damage.
This post of yours is not proof of a god.

But it IS proof you are severely retarded.

Likely due to religious brain-damage.

“you must not give faith”

Since: Jul 12

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
May 16, 2013
 
Just the start made me stop reading "These so-called “New Atheists” differ from classical atheism in that they are aggressively evangelical and they believe that society can have morality without religion." What did all the atheists before us say "we are evil, we are good for nothing, we are the bringer of doom..." BULLS***!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
May 16, 2013
 
Benjamin Frankly wrote:
Just the start made me stop reading "These so-called “New Atheists” differ from classical atheism in that they are aggressively evangelical and they believe that society can have morality without religion." What did all the atheists before us say "we are evil, we are good for nothing, we are the bringer of doom..." BULLS***!
The biggest difference between then and now?

Not all that long ago, being an atheist openly, would get you strung up by your neck, or attached to a stake over some kindling.

It's only been fairly recently that being openly atheist wasn't an instant death sentence.

However, in some areas of the world, where the insanity of religion is still government?

It still is a death sentence to be atheist.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••