get ready for boobquake day

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#1273 Mar 29, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What was wrong with that post? Nanoanomaly was attacked. She was innocent, despite what your evil minds might assume. The people who attacked her were very cruel! Aren't you interested in what makes people cruel and kind, right?
The post in question suggested that Bob had been raped with a staff by his mother and that that had caused him to have a less than healthy sex life. How can you possibly defend that?

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#1274 Mar 29, 2013
And, lo and behold, it's already gone. I guess the Topix admins agreed that it was disgustingly over the top.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#1275 Mar 29, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What was wrong with that post? Nanoanomaly was attacked. She was innocent, despite what your evil minds might assume. The people who attacked her were very cruel! Aren't you interested in what makes people cruel and kind, right?
You have not been paying attention, or you're filtering what you read a lot.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1276 Mar 29, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
The post in question suggested that Bob had been raped with a staff by his mother and that that had caused him to have a less than healthy sex life. How can you possibly defend that?
He attacked Nanoanomaly in a way just as worse. He got what he deserved.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1277 Mar 29, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
The post in question suggested that Bob had been raped with a staff by his mother and that that had caused him to have a less than healthy sex life. How can you possibly defend that?
Lol, how comical you described it! Imagine them allowing that post, as acceptable as it should be, keeping it on here! It would be much cleaner!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1278 Mar 29, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the statement I made!
Sure, sure bub... sure.

Keep telling yourself that little lie; maybe one day, it'll not BE a lie....

... LMAO!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1279 Mar 29, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
What was wrong with that post? Nanoanomaly was attacked. She was innocent, despite what your evil minds might assume. The people who attacked her were very cruel! Aren't you interested in what makes people cruel and kind, right?
Nano is a stalker, plain and simple.

She doesn't get half the criticism she so richly deserves--especially considering she's also one of you Genuine Christards™

But I can easily see you "defending" her-- likely because you ARE her?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1280 Mar 29, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is not sickening. There is nothing wrong with spanking teenage girls at schools, to help them feel stimulated. Sexual spankings are your problem!
Your deeply flawed character issues continue to be exposed.

But sexual depravity & pedophilia are a new low, even for one of you Genuine Christian Pedophiles™
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1281 Mar 30, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure, sure bub... sure.
Keep telling yourself that little lie; maybe one day, it'll not BE a lie....
... LMAO!
Boy, nothing wrong still, it won't get me arrested.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1282 Mar 30, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Nano is a stalker, plain and simple.
She doesn't get half the criticism she so richly deserves--especially considering she's also one of you Genuine Christards™
But I can easily see you "defending" her-- likely because you ARE her?
No, you stalked her, mentioning you wanted to spank her. Leave her alone, for goodness sake, lad!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1283 Mar 30, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you stalked her, mentioning you wanted to spank her. Leave her alone, for goodness sake, lad!
*sigh*

No-- I never wanted to spank ANYONE. She did ask for it on several occasions, not just from me either.

I think spanking is evil-- under all circumstances, regardless of who is involved.

Go back in history for the FACTS, before you start making false accusations....

... wait. What am I saying? You are obviously a Genuine Christian Hatetheist™ and making false accusations-- lies-- is what you do best.

In fact?

It's ALL you do.

Just like Nano, come to think of it.

Did she ask you to abuse her? Is that why you are slavering over her like a mindless dog?

hmmm... that sounds quite likely.

Nano is quite depraved-- she attracts people who are also depraved.

I should have realized that from the start...
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1284 Mar 30, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
*sigh*
No-- I never wanted to spank ANYONE. She did ask for it on several occasions, not just from me either.
I think spanking is evil-- under all circumstances, regardless of who is involved.
Go back in history for the FACTS, before you start making false accusations....
... wait. What am I saying? You are obviously a Genuine Christian Hatetheist™ and making false accusations-- lies-- is what you do best.
In fact?
It's ALL you do.
Just like Nano, come to think of it.
Did she ask you to abuse her? Is that why you are slavering over her like a mindless dog?
hmmm... that sounds quite likely.
Nano is quite depraved-- she attracts people who are also depraved.
I should have realized that from the start...
Nanoanomaly never mentioned she wanted a spanking, you mentioned you wanted to give her it. She only mentioned spanking in Monty Python.

I take it you were spanked, too much, too hard, all the time, never let off, by your old man, so you go to other women who were just the same, and you form an attraction them. Did you suspect Nanoanomaly was already spanked, and so it attracted you to her, and then you had a desire to spank her yourself, to help transform the brutality of your parents into a form of love?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1285 Mar 30, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Nanoanomaly never mentioned she wanted a spanking,
Actually, she did-- several years ago, and then again repeatedly when she flirted with various other posters.

History: learn it, or be shown a fool and a liar.
Largelanguage wrote:
you mentioned you wanted to give her it.
Nope. You are lying. Lying is what ALL True Believers™ are guilty of.

Why do you lie?

Oh! You lie because you have no... facts.
Largelanguage wrote:
She only mentioned spanking in Monty Python.
Wrong again, Oh Liar! Monty Python was mentioned by several different people, me included.

Nanomindless had not seen it-- but expressed strong attraction to being spanked by anyone who would give her the attention she so desperately sought.

Again? You lie... why? Because, again, you have no ... facts.
Largelanguage wrote:
I take it you were spanked, too much, too hard, all the time, never let off, by your old man, so you go to other women who were just the same, and you form an attraction them.
Nope. You lie... why? Because, again, you have no ... facts.

This last bit is so hideous, that it can only come from your own, personal experience.

The only question? Is this: were you the old man? Or were you the child in this ugly scenario.

Likely? You are ... both.

Sad for you.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#1286 Mar 30, 2013
Largelanguage probably resurrected this thread without realizing that Nano began posting in it a Sheila...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1287 Mar 30, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
Largelanguage probably resurrected this thread without realizing that Nano began posting in it a Sheila...
Or else, it's Nano using a sock... again.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#1288 Mar 30, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Or else, it's Nano using a sock... again.
I don't need a sock to smack you down.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#1289 Mar 30, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need a sock to smack you down.
Really?

In all this time-- you've never managed to defeat me in an argument even one time.

But I see you do use violent terms, in keeping with your violent personality.

Real classy.

But to be expected from a psychopath such as yourself.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#1290 Mar 31, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
In all this time-- you've never managed to defeat me in an argument even one time.
But I see you do use violent terms, in keeping with your violent personality.
Real classy.
But to be expected from a psychopath such as yourself.
lol

You are demented.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1291 Mar 31, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I don't need a sock to smack you down.
So no proof of god then. Should have sh*t the f*ck up instead of littering this thread with your inane bullsh*t.
Largelanguage

Wrexham, UK

#1292 Mar 31, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, she did-- several years ago, and then again repeatedly when she flirted with various other posters.
History: learn it, or be shown a fool and a liar.
<quoted text>
Nope. You are lying. Lying is what ALL True Believers™ are guilty of.
Why do you lie?
Oh! You lie because you have no... facts.
<quoted text>
Wrong again, Oh Liar! Monty Python was mentioned by several different people, me included.
Nanomindless had not seen it-- but expressed strong attraction to being spanked by anyone who would give her the attention she so desperately sought.
Again? You lie... why? Because, again, you have no ... facts.
<quoted text>
Nope. You lie... why? Because, again, you have no ... facts.
This last bit is so hideous, that it can only come from your own, personal experience.
The only question? Is this: were you the old man? Or were you the child in this ugly scenario.
Likely? You are ... both.
Sad for you.
She wasn't flirting, she was going along with the script. She showed no interest in you. You were the ones who said you wanted to have sex with other men and spank nano.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 33 min Thinking 47,904
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr -Stray Dog 247,760
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr Thinking 12,908
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 2 hr thetruth 2,358
News As an atheist, how do I maintain my relationshi... 2 hr Thinking 60
News Atheism, the Bible and sexual orientation 3 hr Thinking 30
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) Wed macumazahn 20,900
More from around the web