Atheism Destroyed At Last! - The Deba...

Since: Jan 14

United States

#704 Mar 31, 2014
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong there's no proof
No proof of color to a blind person.

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#705 Mar 31, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>Then your God can't be omnipotent.As he wouldn't be able to break that rock.
A God that can make any rock can unmake it. therefore It is omnipotent.

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#706 Mar 31, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>Then your God can't be omnipotent.As he wouldn't be able to break that rock.
A God that can create the uncreatable can as well break the unbreakable.
Thinking

Wellingborough, UK

#707 Mar 31, 2014
So your god isn't omnipotent.
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
A God that can create the uncreatable can as well break the unbreakable.

Since: Jan 14

United States

#708 Mar 31, 2014
Thinking wrote:
So your god isn't omnipotent.
<quoted text>
Sorry, Review my premise and conclusion, and then your illogical conclusion.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#709 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
A God that can create the uncreatable can as well break the unbreakable.
I have said that such rock is possible.And as long as it is possible,it is undoubtedly can be created.So that's sums it up mate.
I have finally caught you as your BS ends with a preposterous conclusion.The more you tried to sound like a smart person the more stupider your arguments become and now finally you've hit the rock bottom of inanity that you're defending a self-contradictory statement and asserting it to be logical and meaningful.
You failed!You can sell your crap somewhere else

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#710 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
A God that can make any rock can unmake it. therefore It is omnipotent.
Oh I missed this one.
As long as your God can make that rock he isn't omnipotent as such rock's creation would prove his inability of breaking a rock.
So your omnipotence argument doesn't hold water and so is any of your argument.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#711 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
No proof of color to a blind person.
Confirmed for no proof

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#712 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
The proof has eluded you.
It has eluded everyone. That would be the way all god proof ends up. You may claim it and there are some who need no actual proof to believe any idiocy, but so far nothing you have presented adds up to any more than crap that you are trying to sell. You've not even convinced a quietly lurking fool or two. We know, because they will pipe up, when they have been deluded. And BION real proof would be indisputable.

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#713 Mar 31, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>
I have said that such rock is possible.And as long as it is possible,it is undoubtedly can be created.So that's sums it up mate.
I have finally caught you as your BS ends with a preposterous conclusion.The more you tried to sound like a smart person the more stupider your arguments become and now finally you've hit the rock bottom of inanity that you're defending a self-contradictory statement and asserting it to be logical and meaningful.
You failed!You can sell your crap somewhere else
Hypthesis! You assume the uncreatable rock was created. You are not a match for me.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#714 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
Hypthesis! You assume the uncreatable rock was created. You are not a match for me.
Haha!
It is funny how you call it assumption when you yourself making an unwarranted assumption that such rock cannot be created.What I told is a possibility and what you're concluding is an assumption!Tell me why such rock cannot be created?You're assuming that such rock can never be created by you never told me why.
You did accept that your hypothetical omnipotent God can create such rock in one of your previous posts and in the very next post you came with the same old excuse that such rock cannot be created.
It is very obvious you'd realized that it would have been a foot in mouth situation for you had you maintained that argument and hence you switched to your former stance that such rock cannot be created which is an unwarranted assumption as you have never explained why such rock cannot be created.
You are easily the dumbest poster I've ever talked with on this forum and your frequent change in your arguments shows that you're not sure of what you're talking about .I hereby ending this discussion on omnipotence as I cogently proved such an omnipotent being cannot exist with the help of omnipotent paradox. You're dismissed !

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#715 Mar 31, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I missed this one.
As long as your God can make that rock he isn't omnipotent as such rock's creation would prove his inability of breaking a rock.
So your omnipotence argument doesn't hold water and so is any of your argument.
No creation!

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#716 Mar 31, 2014
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>It has eluded everyone. That would be the way all god proof ends up. You may claim it and there are some who need no actual proof to believe any idiocy, but so far nothing you have presented adds up to any more than crap that you are trying to sell. You've not even convinced a quietly lurking fool or two. We know, because they will pipe up, when they have been deluded. And BION real proof would be indisputable.
Acquisition of new knowledge is a gradual process. With time, you will know the truth .
Thinking

Wellingborough, UK

#717 Mar 31, 2014
If your god was omnipotent you wouldn't have to ask.
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, Review my premise and conclusion, and then your illogical conclusion.
Thinking

Wellingborough, UK

#718 Mar 31, 2014
Wrong.
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
No proof of color to a blind person.

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#719 Mar 31, 2014
fadu singh,
You are the exact opposite of consistency.
Many viewers must have been following the arguments, and the unbiased among them would have noted how unfalteringly consistent I have been. You can't be judge over yourself.
I need an original mind and a finer brain to interact with, not a copy-atheist like you.
I earlier on thought you have your own independent understanding of what atheism and its antithesis mean, but I was mistaken!
As soon as an irrelevant door closes, a relevant one will open.
At least, you have exhausted your 'intellectual' wherewithal. You couldn't have exceeded your upper limit.
You can now make your exit hence, Bye for good and for all.

Since: Jan 14

Ashburn, VA

#720 Mar 31, 2014
Thinking wrote:
If your god was omnipotent you wouldn't have to ask.
<quoted text>
To ask what?
Thinking

Wellingborough, UK

#721 Mar 31, 2014
Yes.
jide oni wrote:
<quoted text>
To ask what?

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#722 Mar 31, 2014
jide oni wrote:
fadu singh,
You are the exact opposite of consistency.
Many viewers must have been following the arguments, and the unbiased among them would have noted how unfalteringly consistent I have been. You can't be judge over yourself.
I need an original mind and a finer brain to interact with, not a copy-atheist like you.
I earlier on thought you have your own independent understanding of what atheism and its antithesis mean, but I was mistaken!
As soon as an irrelevant door closes, a relevant one will open.
At least, you have exhausted your 'intellectual' wherewithal. You couldn't have exceeded your upper limit.
You can now make your exit hence, Bye for good and for all.
There was no inconsistency in my arguments I suppose.If it was then you should have pointed it out.I am not judging myself or ever posed myself as a genius.
The omnipotent paradox is an age old logical argument and it is not my original brainchild.It's not about being original or unoriginal;it's about being how logical and true your statements are.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#723 Mar 31, 2014
Jide oni:"A God that can make any rock can unmake it. therefore It is omnipotent."
This one quote of you proves that you're full of crap.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr Aura Mytha 81,488
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 10 hr Dogen 32,891
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 13 hr Dogen 2,187
News Atheist inmate wins right to practice his faith... (Aug '15) Oct 11 old_moose 233
News People's forum - Get off the fence of religious... (May '10) Oct 10 blacklagoon 3 94
Deconversion (Feb '17) Oct 10 Eagle 12 - 145
News Atheist Student Organization Faces Revolt From ... Oct 9 Opium for dummies 7
More from around the web