Muq comes from a society that butchers children and will kill you if you ask the wrong question.
<quoted text>I am not biased.I am asking for the obvious clarification
What Muhammad did exactly?He declared himself as prophet and followed some of the tenets of Christianity and Judaism.
At the same time,he advocated that both Jewish and Christian scriptures had been corrupted albeit he approved the founder of both religions as prophet.
Why cannot I be a prophet if I do the same thing?
I would agree that Muhammad was true prophet and follow his footsteps.But I would deny the belief that he was a last prophet and claim myself as the one.I would call Quran is corrupted even though it was from a true prophet.I would accuse those ancient Arabs who orally transmitted Quranic message after his death of corrupting Quran.I would declare myself as the true last prophet and would try to convince people that Muhammad was not the last prophet;it was a big lie told by the early Muslims.
I would do the same thing what your prophet did.
Then why you would disbelieve me being if I do the aforesaid?
The criteria that you mentioned were very simple.Then why can't I be a prophet?
What irrefutable proof Islam has produced that Muhammad was indeed the last prophet?
Muslims accuse church of corruption of Bible.I would do the same and accuse Muslims who would orally spread Quranic message before Quran had took tangible form.Will you accept me as a prophet if I do that?
It is just that easy.That is why I ask if there was any hard criteria known before Islam that confirms all your claims and negates the possibility of anyone becoming prophet.
Understand me MUQ!
Don't blame me if you are incompetent to give plausible explanations.