I dragged the discussion back to square one because you haven't given any plausible arguments.Rather you have tried to evade my posts either by not answering or giving some insipid explanations that don't make any sense.<quoted text>
Another thing which I notice is that you come back to square one, when we have already covered that.
It was discussed and I told you that God has no beginning, and gave you arguments about them, but again you make the same statements.
Then you say Physical laws had no beginning, how can this be true, when this Universe had a Beginning?
These laws were Created when the Universe was created. And this Universe cannot be created and function, unless a Super Intelligent Creator, Knows everything and has Power to do what He wants and Wills and there is No One to stop Him from doing what He wishes.
This is the Creator for you.
And you ridicule that "water cycle" designed by Creator is "faulty", you "design and implement" a scheme to provide water to every living creature on this earth.
Why whole earth, just do it for your city and ensure every living thing gets drinking water to survive.
It is very easy to criticise the design of others, especially for those, who have "Not Created" any thing.
If the laws were not created, then how come they came into existence? Why the force of Gravity should decrease by the Square root of the distance between the two objects, why not cube, why not raise to the power four?
The same is true about every law, they were fixed and they are followed everywhere in the Universe.
When you say God had no beginning you have to explain it why you believe so.Show me where you had given explanation why God hadn't had beginning except for the ridicule logic that"God is not a thing."Whatever you assume him to be,you have to explain how that "not a thing" had had no beginning and came out of nothing.If you do not know that means you are blindly believing in God.
If it was that simple as you said,seriously there would be no atheist in the world and everyone would unanimously agree the God's existence.If God came out of nothing,why can't be the same for physical laws?.But the problem is we atheists/agnostics ask for explanations and you theists come up with which you theist evade of.We don't believe in God because we ask for evidences and we couldn't get it so far.
As far as physical laws are concerned,science has no answer yet as to how they came into existence and there is some popular theories and notions from different scientists but none has been accepted by majority .
Stephen Hawking believes that universe and physical laws might have been come out of nothing.At least,Stephen Hawking(an atheist) took a scientific approach to explain the existence of physical laws.But do you theists have any scientific explanation for the same as well as your God?The answer is no.We can't be a lemming of a "non-answering" religions.
If gravity decreases by square root of distance between objects,does it mean it proves God?I already told you that physical laws rigidity doesn't prove the existence of God.If that is true(I believe so),then religions are false(including yours) because you have a contradictory belief that your prophets performed miracles defying physical laws.You can either believe in rigidity of physical laws or their acclivity towards change but not both simultaneously.
I criticized your God's plan because of your belief that contradicts facts.
You say that God is omnipotent.On the other hand,he couldn't even make a "perfect earth" for human beings and other living things.Everything we do for our comfort ends up against nature either in the form of global warming or other menace.So if you call this universe a "perfection" then he is not merciful enough to us since he hadn't even created a "perfect earth" where human beings can live with comforts without going against nature.Everything we do for do proves to be detrimental in some or the other way