Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Apr 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Psychology Today

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Comments
11,541 - 11,560 of 21,400 Comments Last updated 11 hrs ago

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12258
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
How can there be physical evidence for that which is non-physical? To expect it is not only irrational but ludicrous.
And to believe without evidence is also illogical and ludicrous. The conclusion? There is no such thing as a 'non-physical reality'.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12259
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
That which is beyond the ordinary range of human comprehension cannot be objectified...hence the necessity for metaphors.
Which are inherently imprecise and unreliable. Using vague language to make irrational points is not an increase of knowledge.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12260
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
For physical reality.
Redundant. Physical reality=reality.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12261
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Scientific theories are not facts and yet you believe them.
Scientific theories are based on the observable facts and are tested using such facts. I realize they are 'best effort' results which can be replaced if new evidence is found.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12262
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
And to believe without evidence is also illogical and ludicrous. The conclusion? There is no such thing as a 'non-physical reality'.
Or, at least, that it is illogical and ludicrous to discuss it.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12263
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Your rational conclusion is only an opinion.
It's a rational conclusion based on the evidence.
insidesecrets wrote:
If you have never experienced transcendent events, how would you know such experiences do not exist and are not legitimate?
They have no evidence to support them, they're contradictory, and they have superior alternate explanations (delusion, mental illness, etc).

That's why YOU reject all "transcendent events" that you disagree with.
Thinking

Charlton Mackrell, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12264
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

What has spirituality got that reality plus imagination hasn't?
insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Hearing about spirituality is not the same as experiencing it. Try it sometime, you might like it.
Brit Expat

Montpellier, France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12265
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The Irish question:-
Pure religion(Catholic nonsense) in action!!!
Slave labour in the laundries!
Nuns making millions of Dollars!
Monks getting a free "legover"
What next??? Abdul and the Mullahs doing the same things!
Brainwashed religous types please wake up you're being screwed.
BUT! SADLY BRAINWASHING THE HUMAN MONKEY REALLY DOES WORK.
The Atheist.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12266
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Ladies and gentlemen this anti science idiot has all the answers! What flows through our veins?

God-stuff!

Bravo!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahah a!
insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Or the narrow minded atheist whose skewed world view is scraping the bottom of the barrel of human ignorance.
rio

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12267
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Givemeliberty wrote:
Sheesh email your preacher pray to your Jewsus and calm down. You are really making a jackass out of yourself now.
<quoted text>
Do you always answer to posts 3 days later?

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12268
Feb 5, 2013
 
insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Refer to post #12246
Again, you're just making stuff up.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12269
Feb 5, 2013
 
01Justsayin wrote:
<quoted text>
That dude bores me. Was the interview at least entertaining?
I haven't seen it yet. It's on my DVR.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12270
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
If you have never experienced transcendent events, how would you know such experiences do not exist and are not legitimate?
How can you know it is legitimate?

"Are there things in the Universe that we cannot know in the usual way of observing and measuring, but that we can know in some other way -- intuition, revelation, mad insight?

If so, how can you know that what you know in these non-knowing ways is really so?

Anything you know without knowing, others can know only through your flat statement without any proof other than 'I know!'

All this leads to such madness that I, for one, am content with the knowable. That is enough to know." ~ Isaac Asimov

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12271
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

insidesecrets wrote:
If you have never experienced transcendent events, how would you know such experiences do not exist and are not legitimate?
Why would you assume that nobody here has experienced a 'transcendental event'? I do assume that such *experiences* exists, but know they are not legitimate. They are one of the many ways that the brain can fool itself; illusions, if you wish.

Since: Mar 11

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12272
Feb 5, 2013
 
Certainly she is unable to keep up with her lies. Not surprising as she is a Christhole flailing and just failing.
jacktheladat1 wrote:
<quoted text>This is just one example where the adage I posted, and some know-alls on here shot-down a while ago, applies,= "Good liars need even better memories."
Brit Expat

Montpellier, France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12273
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Worth watching. Religion in action. You wont find this on the BBC or FOXCRAP.
http://www.aljazeera.com/video/europe/2013/02...

Since: Mar 11

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12274
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Sharp as a marble that Rio and thick as pigsht.

Best pray for 40 IQ points ok wanker?
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you always answer to posts 3 days later?
insidesecrets

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12275
Feb 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Which are inherently imprecise and unreliable. Using vague language to make irrational points is not an increase of knowledge.
Neither will ignoring transcendent human experience add to one's knowledge. An atheist looks into the abyss and sees nothing. The theist experiences God, and the abyss opens unto worlds of knowledge.
insidesecrets

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12276
Feb 5, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you assume that nobody here has experienced a 'transcendental event'? I do assume that such *experiences* exists, but know they are not legitimate. They are one of the many ways that the brain can fool itself; illusions, if you wish.
If it exists, it is legitimate.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12277
Feb 5, 2013
 
01Justsayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Youtubed it. It was a very interesting interview. Maher looked like a corpse as always, but the other guy did bring up some good points. Not enough to make me convert, of course. But I could definitely view them objectively. Still gonna hang onto my 1st amendment rights.
I looked for that on YouTube and found an earlier interview of Harris on Maher's show dated August 21, 2009. That's probably the one you saw. That was a good interview.

[tick-tock]

I just watched most of the recent Sam Harris spot. Unfortunately, the five minutes or so of it that I saw was all about gun control. What he said wasn't too interesting or useful.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

8 Users are viewing the Atheism Forum right now

Search the Atheism Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 42 min Catcher1 224,351
Our world came from nothing? 1 hr NightSerf 240
20+ Questions for Theists (Apr '13) 4 hr Patrick 385
What does "Atheism" mean? 6 hr Reason Personified 10
Introducing The Universal Religion 6 hr Reason Personified 733
Talking some sense into you people... 13 hr religionisillness 24
The numbers are in: America still distrusts ath... 13 hr religionisillness 19
•••
•••