Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Apr 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Psychology Today

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Comments
11,321 - 11,340 of 21,505 Comments Last updated 32 min ago

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#12033 Feb 3, 2013
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...
rio wrote:
I think you project too much what happens in the US on the rest of the world.
Maybe. Why do you say so?
rio wrote:
Atheists and gays persecuted in America? Tell me more because that's news to me
That's a long subject. Here's a little on atheophobia

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...
rio wrote:
you seem to be the avant-guard of the gay movement as witness your gay parades, etc...
You seem to be out of touch.
rio wrote:
what "church" are you talking abou?
The Christian church
rio wrote:
I cannot figure out who is behind that persecution you mentioned. Catholic? Evangelist? Protestant? Pentacostal? etc....
Yes.
rio wrote:
if you mean the Pope by the Holy Pigeon
Spiritus Sancti
rio

Beckenham, UK

#12034 Feb 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
I really didn't know it was that bad over there.

We don't have that problem here, and in fact religious subjects are rarely mentioned in public. You could live near to someone or work with him for years without knowing his religion or lack of. Unless that person wants to display or or try some proselytism on you.
We have plenty of politicians who say they are atheist and that's OK. Why not?

Come over here and smell the coffee, as you say ...

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#12035 Feb 3, 2013
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't look like it ...
You may want to check out what the Bible has to say about Ananias and Sapphira:

Like I said, the principle of killing those who don't conform to the collectivisation of goods/property was a biblical one. This was nearly two thousand years before the advent of Marx and Engels.

Ananias and Sapphira were killed for failing to comply with the collective.

How very communist.
insidesecrets

Albuquerque, NM

#12036 Feb 3, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
"before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me"
Isaiah 43:10
In other words, there was nothing before your god because that's exactly what the Bible tells us was there before him.
By your own definition, your religion is a philosophy of absurdity.
Taking things out of context is an old atheist trick.

"Ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me."

This means that the Lord is the only God...none before Him or after.
insidesecrets

Albuquerque, NM

#12037 Feb 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Stalin's moral upbringing was the work of his church, which had him into his young adulthood. If humanists had had him first, he would likely have been a better man.
Until he met Darwin, that is. Like all atheists, he figured he could do anything as long as there was no God in heaven keeping score.

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#12038 Feb 3, 2013
insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
Taking things out of context is an old atheist trick.
"Ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me."
This means that the Lord is the only God...none before Him or after.
So why does your god talk about a time before him when there was no god?

Not just that, but he also says that after his time there will be no god.

I guess your god isn't eternal after all.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12040 Feb 3, 2013
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right, I do not live in the USA, thanks god for that !(pun intended to annoy you!!)
What on hearts the "hategodbots" have forced on you in America?
So, for you tolerating someone is agreeing with him? To me it's just being plainly civilised.
Wow, I am so glad to live in a tolerant country!
Anti-religion fanatics soiund just as bad as religiuous fanatics.
Smell the coffee and get a life!!!
You continue to sound like a lying god-botherer.

Nothing you have said so far, indicates you are anything but a hateful god-pusher.

Your condescending and patronizing tone to me, only makes it worse.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12041 Feb 3, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Another little question, was Stalin advancing the cause of atheism or was he advancing the cause of Stalin?
And Stalin was a member of the Russian Orthodox Church to the day he died.....ahhhhhh, now just what was your point?
Indeed.

The religion of Stalin was... Stalin.

A classic cult of personality, in this case, one who was quite paranoid and not a little delusional too.

Interesting: many of your more prominent religious leaders share those same traits...

... how about that?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12042 Feb 3, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Yup. One of those cults that displays no traits of a cult.
1. the leader is charismatic and often militaristically demanding
Nope. No leader.
2. the leader is always right
Nope. No leader.
3. elitism, the leaders treated as royalty or a sense of awe, hierarchical, authoritarian power structure
Nope. No leader.
4. lower members get no respect, or get abused
Nope. No hierarchy.
5. leader is not held accountable for his actions or the actions of his authority structure
Nope. No leader.
6. leader will not tolerate or receive criticism, but leader criticizes all others
Nope. No leader.
7. there is no exit
Nope. There isn't even a collection of members, much less any enforcement of membership.
8. if members exit they are considered rebellious, out of the will of a higher power or the leader
Nope. No one cares if people leave atheism and no leader.
9. members do not have any association with members that have left the group
Nope. No shunning.
10. there are no graduates from the “program” or group, just deserters or evil people
Nope. None viewed that way.
11. there is cult speak (a language many others can not understand)
Nope. No special language.
12. personal attacks on critics or those who are not in the group
Nope. Arguments made based on issues at hand.
13. solidarity within themselves, no outside allegiance or association
Nope. No solidarity.
14. use of guilt to manipulate members
Nope.
15. the leaders of group are self absorbed
Nope. No leaders.
16. instant community
Nope. Very little community at all.
17. members unable to tell the truth
Nope.
18. money grubbing
Nope. No money involved at all.
19. newcomers don’t “think right” and need to be trained
Nope. No training.
20. system of punishment and reward
Nope. No punishments or rewards.
21. intrusiveness
Nope. No intrusion whatsoever.
22. sense of powerless, dependency, covert fear, guilt
Nope.
23. members and leaders are imbalanced or mentally ill
Nope.
24. thought stopping language, clichés, or slogans
Nope.
25. demands of ultra loyalty or ultra trust in the groups process and others
Nope.
Well done! Exactly on-point.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12043 Feb 3, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't do those things myself, but even if I did at least I would KNOW I was pretending. It's called entertainment.
You, for instance, would think it was a REAL world, lol.
Exactly.

Godbots have strong trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality.

If they could? They wouldn't BE godbots... now would they?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12044 Feb 3, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Might makes right, eh?
Do you ever read your drivel before you post it?
We should keep religion because people like ceremonies???? You assume there has to be a religious connotation to every celebration?
You are a dolt.
I've got his number: he's a godbot, pretending.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12045 Feb 3, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Enabler and most likely participant.
2. Falsehoods are NEVER harmless.
Yep.
Thinking

Saffron Walden, UK

#12046 Feb 3, 2013
rio posted he married a muslim. Taqiyya runs strong through all that rio posts.
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to sound like a lying god-botherer.
Nothing you have said so far, indicates you are anything but a hateful god-pusher.
Your condescending and patronizing tone to me, only makes it worse.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12047 Feb 3, 2013
insidesecrets wrote:
<quoted text>
If, if, if. Your fear of Christians gives them more power than they actually have!
...you do not actually watch the real-world news, do you?

Sad.
insidesecrets wrote:
Science rules the academic world with an iron fist.
They HAVE to-- idiots and morons (such as yourself) would quickly dilute real science with pseudo-babble such as creationism and religion.

History taught this lesson too well. In the past? You morons were so afraid of science, that you routinely murdered any and all scientists.

Galileo? Do you remember his murder, at the hands of you anti-science morons?
insidesecrets wrote:
It is insane to fret about the possibility of creationism being taught in elementary schools.
In elementary schools is where the brainwashing begins.

And that turns out mindless god-robots, like YOU, who deny actual reality itself, to cling to your idiotic notions.

So, no-- elementary school is MORE off-limits than any other venue. It MUST be.

You are a perfect example of why.
insidesecrets wrote:
Until creationism actually invades science departments at the collegiate level, it is simply irrational and unnecessary to berate Christians for what has not happened. Instead of reacting to what if's, try reacting to what is.
It IS happening, nationwide. And you moronic fools keep getting bigoted laws passed in the name of your cult (Genuine Christianity™).

So we rationalists MUST oppose you at every turn, in the public sphere.

You are free to abuse yourselves in private all you like-- it IS a free country after all.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12048 Feb 3, 2013
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
British churches are non-profit organisations which are exempt of taxes in Britain. Same as charities, etc...
There you go: they are TAX SUPPORTED cults.

Just like in the USA.

Your taxes SUPPORT them, by them being exempt.

There is more than one way to pay the drug-dealer--in this case, the drug is delusions(faith).

And you continue to prove you are just another lying godbot.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12049 Feb 3, 2013
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism is at the core of marxism, I can tell you.
Marxism-Leninism had the suppression of religion as one of its fundamental task in its programme, and its replacement by the ideal of communism.
So, we just have to look at the fail attempt at socialist utopia in USSR and other places, to have a good idea of what society would be with atheists in power: it's not pretty!
Atheists can be just as intolerant as religionists, and an atheist country has nothing to envy from a theist state.
Just another lying godbot's inane (and wrong) comments.

Next!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12050 Feb 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You all do.
In fact, it's IANS Fifth Law (Godbot’s law) of Internet fundies - named in honor of Godwin. From http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/TMVMHAPR8... :
[1] IANS First Law: You cannot successfully refute atheism without producing a god
[2] IANS Second Law: Regardless of what they may say to the contrary, all theists posting on atheist threads are there to proselytize to atheists.
[3] IANS Third Law: Christians will dissemble without compunction while proselytizing.
[4] IANS Fourth Law: Anybody calling himself an atheist, agnostic or deist who is arguing with the bulk of atheists around him is a stealth theist until proven otherwise.
[5] IANS Fifth Law (Godbot’s law): As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a theist citing Stalin, Mao, and/or Pol Pot approaches one."
You got it, Doc. The UK poster calling himself "rio" is just another lying godbot.

Not even as clever as some in the past...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12051 Feb 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm still laughing.
The Christians want respect. They also want us to respect the chicken talon - to obey it and to hate what it hates. I don't see any of that happening happening.
:)

I find it helps to have a graphic word-painting, when posting satire.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#12052 Feb 3, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
[4] IANS Fourth Law: Anybody calling himself an atheist, agnostic or deist who is arguing with the bulk of atheists around him is a stealth theist until proven otherwise.
Yep.

After over 6 years of dealing with these people, one develops a kind of "godbot-radar".

:)

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#12053 Feb 3, 2013
Which just goes to prove he is a believer even though he lies errr I mean in the spirit of debate wishes us to not talk about his faith. Lol :)
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, healing a delusion does not produce a vacuum because the delusion itself is a vacuum.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 43 min CunningLinguist 226,391
The Ultimate Evidence of God 3 hr CunningLinguist 65
Atheists forgetting the meaning of freedom 9 hr Jaimie 57
The myth of the angry atheist 10 hr _Bad Company 1
I left Creationism! Ask me anything! 11 hr Patrick 7
100% Faith Free 12 hr CunningLinguist 14
Should Uninformed Opinion Be Respected? 12 hr CunningLinguist 39
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••