Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Apr 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Psychology Today

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Comments (Page 530)

Showing posts 10,581 - 10,600 of20,784
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11253
Jan 23, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
It does not matter whether you confess it or not. God has revealed Himself to you. But you suppress that truth in unrighteousness.
Why do you think you know that?
mtimber wrote:
If you persist long enough, God will hand you over to the reprobate reasoning that you want to hold onto and you will suffer the consequences of your own choices.
I don't have a choice. I don't have a reason to do that to myself, and therefore cannot, just as I cannot chop off a hand for no reason. It's not an option for me to disregard reason and arbitrarily take a leap of faith on your say so. That can't happen.

If you were correct, I'd be doomed.
mtimber wrote:
Remember, the Bible is the basis for my worldview. You are an atheist that cannot account for the most basic transcendental arguments in philosophy, why would I reject the basis of my worldview and believe you instead?
I can't tell you anything that will appeal to you. You seem as firmly ensconced in faith as I am in reason. Faith defends against reason the way that reason defends against faith. We should probably not expect to convert one another.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11254
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
Muhammed knew which buttons to press. Gardens of paradise, fresh fruit and dates, shade underneath palm trees, free flowing wine, slaves on hand to see to every whim, 72 virgins a man to indulge every sensual whim and pleasure. A fantasy of your average 7th century desert nomad. And brainwashed ppl like Muq believe such fairy tales are literally true.

And the Christian version is to endless sing hallelujahs and praises to Yahweh the blood thirsty God of the Old Testament. A celestial North Korea. Whilst the majority of humankind is suffering horrific torment burning in hell. Very sick minds indeed.
Without a doubt-- as sick as you can be, and still barely qualify as "civilized".

If we are going to indulge in after-life fantasies?

I, for one, rather like the Flying Spaghetti Monster's. Who can argue with beer volcanoes? That automatically dispense the beverage you really wanted, not always the one you asked for either.:)

It's FSM heaven for me.:D

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11255
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Is North Korea an excellent example of atheists in power?
Atheists excellent at making fun of religion, some of it very funny.- "Life of Brian"
When atheist time in power is criticized ....,
Hitler suddenly becomes a Christian.
And the Dark Ages is the best example of Genuine Christians™ in power.

So?

North Korea is a cult of personality-- not a cult of not-believing-in-gods.

That is a distinct difference, but I doubt one you can get-- what with your binary brains and all.

Sad, really.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11256
Jan 23, 2013
 
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
I am in a minority here in not believing Hitler was a Christian. But then you have to ask yourself would a loving God allow his chosen people to be gassed to death, and 60 million people to die in a world war. The answer is of course, no because such an entity, a God that answers prayers, does not exist.
Hitler was provably catholic-- he even had the sitting pope's blessings on his government.

Proof? Here: " http://anticlerical.multiply.com/photos/album... ;

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11257
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
... but I been to Oklahoma. Well they tell me I was born there, but I really don't remember.
Hey, Bob. Nice to see you.
:D

Love it-- I could hear the music in my head as I read what you wrote.

:)

I've been quite well-- I trust all is good at your heathen end, yes?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11258
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed.
I'd take it a step further and say that the campaigns should be brief, inexpensive, and publicly funded, which each candidate having access to free media such as a web site and public television.
Exactly. Remove the corporate donations 100%-- corporations do not get the same rights as real, breathing citizens.

They should not be allowed to influence the vote, either.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11259
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
Very few atheists are totalitarian. And such people would be unlikely to succeed in a humanist society.
You need an example of secular humanism in power. Are you aware of any secular humanist governments that we could examine?
You just blew out what's left of his mind.

Sad for him, isn't it? His binary brain is only capable of zero or one, you see... sad.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11260
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
From God, through the Bible.
And as God cannot be wrong, I have to accept His opinion over yours.
I hope you don't mind me being consistent with my worldview?
So.

Your god is okay with mass-murder of innocent babies?

This was not a wrong act?

Wow-- your god is a baby-killer. Not good, bub.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11261
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Does not a widespread belief in a particular worldview, that cannot be proven empirically, constitute a religion?
A faith in something not observed?
I.E.
1. nothingexploded
2. arockdidit
"1. nothingexploded
2. arockdidit " <<< strictly religitard views.

In other words, if it didn't come from you loons, we would have never heard either of them.

And I know your imagination, probably won't be able to handle this, but atheist and evolutionist are not the same.

I am atheist, there are others who are evolutionists, and that man created himself some imaginary gods doesn't answer a single question. Unfortunately though there are people who are comforted by the thought of a sky monkey who would make them eat their children. I guess they don't feel so small if they imagine that they are pet to such a monster.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11262
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
You define an athiest as someone who lacks a belief in gods.
The bible describes an atheist as someone who suppress a knowledge of God, who suppress a belief in God, so that they can be wise in their own eyes. And this activity reduces them to foolishness.
As a biblical christian, I have to accept that basis for identifying atheism.
Coupled to that, the atheists complete inability to account for obvious absolute truth, or even acceptance of that, proves the case...
I described an atheist, as not a theist.

The word theist refers to the person infected by theism, which can, but does not necessarily include god beliefs. I wrote that too, the word atheist is used also as a substitute for non-believer. Now why you choose to completely turn my words around and then ask me to account for your duplicity, I don't even care to know.

Again the "a" makes the word "atheist" mean "not theist".

What the bible calls an atheist is something you do not know, because the bible refers to the person who is rejecting the damn idiocy in it, but makes no mention, of the person who is simply not theist. Though it does make sure that even the bible writers understood that it was smarter to not believe than it is to believe. As a biblical Christain, you are to be stoning those sinners who live around you, who would dare to wear mixed fibers or work on the Sabbath. It is foolishness to profess your god, and not live as commanded. The reason being, because we can see that you do not believe anymore than we do. You absolutely know that there is no penalty for not obeying your god, and we absolutely know that you know it.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11263
Jan 23, 2013
 
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
He would be wrong to let her end the human race. Assuming that she is not known to be infertile, if he can't convince her or seduce her, he must rape her.
This really isn't hard.
And on that island, the rapist is absolutely positive that they are the last two of mankind, and this info was god revealed, of course?

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11264
Jan 23, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

2

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
You have missed the fact that there are two aspects and not one.
Love God.
Love your neighbour.
Now as God is in fact the Creator, then of course He is the originator.
But your prejudiced worldview will suppress the obvious, just so you can carry on being wrong as long as you want.
Are you sure about that?

Contrast someone who loves their neighbour and denies your god, with someone who loves your god but denies their neighbour.

Which one gets their ticket to heaven?

In any event, why did it take your god tens of thousands of years before he got around to telling people to love their neighbours?

After all, an omniscient cosmic mega-being like yours must have known about the Golden Rule and how it is one of the highest measures of good ethical behaviour. Yet your god chose to ignore it until the New Testament.

Of course, while your god was ignoring the Golden Rule, other gods from other belief systems (Hinduism, Jainism) were advocating its use.

In summary, the New Testament tells us that the way to get into Heaven is not that we observe the Golden Rule. Instead, it's that we love Jesus, and to your god, that is more important than following the Golden Rule. It's not nice to harm your fellow humans but as long as you end up loving Jesus with all your heart then you'll be OK for your ticket to Heaven

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11265
Jan 23, 2013
 
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
But I'm right.
Are you saying that if you had to rape an unwilling woman to preserve the human race, that you wouldn't do it? What is the moral basis for that judgment?
I think Asimov addressed that scenario....but it didn't turn out well....oh well.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11266
Jan 24, 2013
 
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
But I'm right.
Are you saying that if you had to rape an unwilling woman to preserve the human race, that you wouldn't do it? What is the moral basis for that judgment?
I disagree. It is not his choice, it is hers. Just as it would be her choice to continue to carry the pregnancy, or to nourish and shelter the infant after it's birth. This rapist simply will not repopulate the earth, without her allowing it.

Meanwhile he would be forever a rapist, and respecting her judgement, and her reasons for those conclusions should have been factored into the choice he made, otherwise him sleeping at any time after he has raped her, puts him at risk of her retaliation, which could result in her being the last human on earth.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11268
Jan 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
In Eden, Eve was offered the opportunity to reason apart from God.
Foolishly, she decided that that was desirable.
Since then, man has been wise in his own eyes, setting himself up as being able to reason apart from God.
To reason above God.
It is this condition, that you are displaying.
You want to reason apart from God, to sit in judgment on God.
This theme is spread throughout the Bible and is the essence of the sinful nature.
A created being, who fancies himself more powerful than the Creator and thinks he can sit in judgment of the Creator.
Because of that, your reasoning is separated from Gods reasoning and ends up being reduced to foolishness.
aka:
arockdidit
etc...
You see if you reject the source of logic and reason, you end up rejecting logic and reason.
This is manifested in a contradictory and arbitrary worldview, which you are displaying.
Proof is in the pudding etc.
OK, thanks. I really shouldn't try to think for myself then, right? I guess that it would be better to let the priests substitute their judgment for my own. Of course, they are just conduits for the Lord, so it's OK.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11269
Jan 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

mtimber wrote:
how can you deny God indeed Created the universe? It seems your argument is anything is plausible except God. Roughly translated, meaning, God is not allowed a foot in the door.
What you call "God" - the principle god in the West - can be ruled out, so no foot in the door for that god.

But that is not true for all possible gods as a class. Not yet, anyway. They still have a toenail in the door.

I'm working on it, however. I am considering an argument that borrows from the intelligent design people, who offer statistical arguments like Hoyle's fallacy - the unlikeliness of a junkyard 747 forming from a tornado - as evidence that irreducibly complex entities can't form uncreated.

What could be more complex than a god? How could it exist uncreated? What argument for a god doesn't collapse when applied to the god itself? You say that we need a god to account for the laws of logic or the laws of physics. What laws must exist for a god to exist and to continue to exist without falling apart? Where did those laws come from?

I suspect that gods are impossible, but I don't think that a statistical argument is proof against the existence of one, even though the Christians like to say that something less likely to occur than one chance in 10E-50 is impossible: http://ncse.com/rncse/20/4/creationism-pseudo...

This might be an example of the kind of thing that you, your bible, and two thousand years of Christianity warn us about: thinking for ourselves. I can see why the priests don't care for it.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11270
Jan 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

mtimber wrote:
Man was given responsibility over all the earth. When man rebelled everything suffered the consequence. Sin does that, it doesn't just affect you, it affects everyone, including your children.

Love does not struggle with responsibility, but selfishness does.
So when mankind does something that brings judgement on them and their family, rather than take responsibility for it, they shake their hands at God and accuse Him of wrong doing...
... and the god then makes innocents take responsibility, including those not yet born.

Tell me more about this kind love, please. This is transcendent love, right? And transcendent justice and mercy. It only appears the opposite to our puny minds, correct?

How could anybody accuse your god of doing wrong?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11271
Jan 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The_Box wrote:
What is your reaction the events in the OT in which
1) God commands the Israelites, after defeating foreign nations, to kill the men and take their women as wives. Surely no one could reasonably believe that women would consent to marrying their husband's murderers, so the consummation of such marriages would surely be rape.
2) God commands that rapists, as punishment, must marry their victims. Again, we can be sure that no women would reasonably want to marry her attacker, so any subsequent sexual encounters would also be rape.
In both instances, God's commands result in approved sexual assaults.
mtimber wrote:
I doubt your rendering of those laws are balanced and unbiased...
Yeah. To be balanced and unbiased, he should have said something more like "arockdidit" or "nothingexploded."
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11272
Jan 24, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is an example from the laws of logic:
The law of non-contradiction.
A dog cannot be a dog and not be a dog at the same time.
What is the basis for that logical claim?
The law itself.
But when allowed to be tested against all knowledge, it is seen to be true.
It points to its own authority as its authority claim and then everything outide of that assumption or presupposition attests that claim.
Hence it is self attesting, yet valid...
Understand and accept this and your conclusion will bring you to God...
OK. Perhaps you meant axiomatic https://www.google.com/search...
Henry

Gräfentonna, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11273
Jan 24, 2013
 
P_Smith wrote:
As I just posted on the site:
-----
Religion will continue to exist as long as these two things also exist:
(1) Uneducated masses who can't think rationally (especially in regard to their biases).
(2) Biased, corrupt and opportunistic "leaders" who see religion as a short cut to wealth, power, sex and social status.
Because those two things are likely to always be with us, we will unfortunately never see the demise of the demented deists.
.
Capitalism has to be abrogated in order to rise atheism!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 10,581 - 10,600 of20,784
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••