There is a bible study here that you can use if you so wish:<quoted text>
"10 When you go to war against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your hands and you take captives, 11 if you notice among the captives a beautiful woman and are attracted to her, you may take her as your wife. 12 Bring her into your home and have her shave her head, trim her nails 13 and put aside the clothes she was wearing when captured. After she has lived in your house and mourned her father and mother for a full month, then you may go to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife. 14 If you are not pleased with her, let her go wherever she wishes. You must not sell her or treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her."
Go to war, find a captive woman you like, she becomes your wife - no consent required.
"Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man."
Keep the women as prizes of war.
"28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, 29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels[c] of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."
Rape a women, you must marry her - her consent is irrelevant. No concern is shown here for the victim, who is punished by having to marry her attacker.
Please tell me where my interpretations are unfair. Women were viewed as property. You took them as wives, and at that point, since they were your property, rape was impossible.
Deuteronomy 22 gives two scenarios in which rape is punished.
1) You rape a girl promised to another man - you die.
2) You rape a girl not promised to anyone - you pay her father 50 silver and must marry her.("you break it, you bought it")
Or you can of course just render the most extreme atheistic rendering of the text that you want to...
The real question is, why is any of the above wrong in an atheistic worldview?