Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Apr 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Psychology Today

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Comments (Page 515)

Showing posts 10,281 - 10,300 of20,851
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10949
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

jacktheladat1 wrote:
<quoted text>As an Atheist, I believe that a lost being akin to youself simply could not be so thick/dense & absolutely full of BS without practicing 24/7 over a life-time. You would be well advised to research the definition of the word "Atheist" prior to insulting the intelligence of an unborn gnat with your current assumption of the word. I'm a DEVOUT Atheist, and DO NOT harbour any lies in my mind re the none existence of ANY deity what-so-ever. I abhor the fact that you have the right to suggest I do. IF there is ANYTHING in your scrotum, you would apologize in your very next post. That though, would be your first post with any amount of thinking in it.
Sorry, the Bible disagrees with you, it says you do know God, but that you have denied and suppressed that truth so that you can carry on living a sinful life.

I base my worldview on the Bible, not your opinion.

As to why I should apologise, are you saying there is an absolute standard of morality you are pointing to, which I should adhere to?

And do you also think that the atheists on this thread that have insulted christians, should also apologise based on that same absolute standard?

No?

I thought not...

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10950
Jan 22, 2013
 
Lincoln wrote:
"Survey after survey shows decline in religious belief .." not really...may be valid on topix threads. Produce the polls?
I just did. Did you see them?
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...
Lincoln wrote:
.... free exercise of religion!
That won't change under humanist cultural hegemony. You'll still be free to nail a chicken to a stick, anoint it with sheep blood, affix jingly bells to it, and shake it over your head at the full moon if that's what gives your life meaning, moral grounding, and a framework for understanding the universe. Go for it!

But your religious life should be as just as private as your sex life and your financial situation. Just keep your severed chicken parts and jingly bells off the money and out of the Pledge, don't try to prevent gay people from marrying because the chicken doesn't approve, and unless happiness for you requires that you scapegoat somebody or otherwise impose your religious values on unbelievers, we can all be happy.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10951
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
It does if you let the Bible explain it.
Man has been in rebellion since Eve's sin in the Garden of Eden.
Since that time, mankind has been trying to suppress the knowledge of God.
Usually by lying to themselves and convincing themselves the lie is true.
They got so successful that at one point, God flooded the earth.
They are also getting to the same point again, which is a sign that Jesus Second Coming is about here.
As in the days of Noah etc...
So it all makes perfect sense.
It boggles the mind that people still believe this is literally true...

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10952
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Would that be the same as the atheistic religion, which attributes everything to a rockdidit?
Because you have to assert the same principle and then test it logically.
Of course if you reject this basic fundamental logical truth, you have just denied your own worldview...
There is no such thing as an "atheistic religion"... but then you already know that. Your need to try and equate atheism to your religion is quite telling. BTW... as an atheist, I am perfectly comfortable in saying "I don't know" to something for which I have no real knowledge of. I don't feel the need to attribute things I don't know about to some 'god' and claiming it "truth". THAT is the purview of the overly religious and their deep seated need to feel "special". It must really suck to have to try and drag everything else down to your level in order to make yourself feel somehow superior. I can tell you really don't believe in your 'god' as much as you claim. If you did, lying to support your views would be something you'd be deathly afraid of since bearing false witness is one of the Top 10 no-no's

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10953
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually that is not true.
As an atheist is merely someone who denies the knowledge of God, that has been revealed to him, then an atheist does not in reality exist beyond the realm of lies in their own mind.
You of course define atheism holding the lie to be a truth.
I define it by the truth.
You must be doing some awesome drugs to write nonsensical BS like that...

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10954
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

mtimber wrote:
What if committing rape gives people pleasure in the society? What then? If pleasure is the deciding factor, as you have stated.
Pleasure is not the deciding factor, and pleasure for one at the expense of another is most definitely not a part of the humanist moral calculus.
Henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10955
Jan 22, 2013
 
Clint wrote:
The utopian state of the authors hypothesis necessary to achieve his prediction is little more than wishful thinking. The nature of humanity is diametrically opposed to harmony.
We are in the atomic age, which means the suicidal effect of capitalism is perhaps the end of mankind. Capitalism and war are twins and the superprofit through war are unavoidable! AKWs are never without fatal effects.
Henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10956
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
The evidence for God is self attesting.
If He did not exist, you would not be able to account for reason, you would not be able to account for morality and would not be able to account for scientific processes.
Of course, there was never a single god among the thausands of gods which were myths nothing else!

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10957
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
So is rape morally wrong in a society that practices rape?
I notice your empathy to non atheists is lacking, are you waiting for that to evolve?:-)
How much empathy are you looking for?

I'll tell you what: I promise to ALWAYS exceed your church's empathy for unbelievers. Here's some now :

[1] "The fool says in his heart,'There is no God.' They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good" - Psalm 14:1

[2] "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone." - Revelation 21:8 And the result of such hate speech is predictable:

I'm not sure that I buy into the expectation that unbelievers unilaterally show respect to Christians whose holy bible calls us fools, no good, corrupt, abominable, the moral equivalent of murderers and whoremongers, and fit for to me dropped conscious into a burning fire to suffer forever.

Wouldn't you agree that that is unreasonable to ask for our empathy?

If you consider those words holy, and authored by a perfectly loving and just god, then you've already gotten just about all of the empathy you deserve from unbelievers.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10958
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
What if committing rape gives people pleasure in the society?
What then?
If pleasure is the deciding factor, as you have stated.
As with many things in morality, the pleasure of one person is balanced by the harm done to another and the necessity of that harm. In this case, the harm done is severe, the necessity low. So the morality is clearly against rape.

On the other hand, there are many species where rape seems to be a necessary aspect of reproduction, so for those species (assuming such could become conscious, another requirement for morality), rape would be moral. For example, it would be moral for intelligent spiders to eat their mates.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10960
Jan 22, 2013
 
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
I just did. Did you see them?
http://www.topix.com/fosm/TF67LDICTMV5DH6IL/p...
<quoted text>
That won't change under humanist cultural hegemony. You'll still be free to nail a chicken to a stick, anoint it with sheep blood, affix jingly bells to it, and shake it over your head at the full moon if that's what gives your life meaning, moral grounding, and a framework for understanding the universe. Go for it!
But your religious life should be as just as private as your sex life and your financial situation. Just keep your severed chicken parts and jingly bells off the money and out of the Pledge, don't try to prevent gay people from marrying because the chicken doesn't approve, and unless happiness for you requires that you scapegoat somebody or otherwise impose your religious values on unbelievers, we can all be happy.
Funny using topix as a source.:---)

Voted for Obama, who is also a Christian.

Atheists 5% of the population
surging toward 5.5%.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10961
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

mtimber wrote:
Man has been in rebellion since Eve's sin in the Garden of Eden. Since that time, mankind has been trying to suppress the knowledge of God. Usually by lying to themselves and convincing themselves the lie is true. They got so successful that at one point, God flooded the earth.
Why would anybody believe that? That flood part describes a moronic and incompetent god. He allegedly was unhappy with mankind, which he was wholly responsible for, and whose future he could allegedly see before he built them.

When they turned out to be sinful as he knew they would be, he decided to nearly sterilize the earth with an impossible rainstorm that caused the miserable and terrifying torture of not just almost all men, but almost all life.

Can you picture the puppies and kitten seeking higher ground until there was no escape, and then, while in a state of sheer terror, have the water level cover their little noses and snuff the life out of them? He could have just "poofed" them away in the manner he created them, but he preferred this.

But wait - besides being senselessly cruel, it's a stupid plan doomed to failure.

To repair the problem, that god reseeded the earth using the exact same breeding stock - a drunk and his family.

Sorry, but that's just not plausible. It's all nonsense. There never was a Noah, nor an Eve, nor a Jehovah. And there is no such thing as sin, nor any need for redemption.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10962
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
What if committing rape gives people pleasure in the society?
What then?
If pleasure is the deciding factor, as you have stated.
Let me put it this way: is the only reason you don't rape because you think that some big daddy in the sky says you shouldn't? If your answer is yes, then *please* keep believing in the big daddy in the sky. You have then shown yourself incapable of true moral judgment. If your answer is no, then you have shown that morality has nothing to do with the existence of deities.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10963
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
How much empathy are you looking for?
I'll tell you what: I promise to ALWAYS exceed your church's empathy for unbelievers. Here's some now :
[1] "The fool says in his heart,'There is no God.' They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good" - Psalm 14:1
[2] "But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone." - Revelation 21:8 And the result of such hate speech is predictable:
I'm not sure that I buy into the expectation that unbelievers unilaterally show respect to Christians whose holy bible calls us fools, no good, corrupt, abominable, the moral equivalent of murderers and whoremongers, and fit for to me dropped conscious into a burning fire to suffer forever.
Wouldn't you agree that that is unreasonable to ask for our empathy?
If you consider those words holy, and authored by a perfectly loving and just god, then you've already gotten just about all of the empathy you deserve from unbelievers.
President Obama was Very inclusive yesterday.
Did he mention atheists?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10964
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

3

Oh sht are you really trying the Eric Hovind absolute argument? Sorry retard about a dozen idiots before you have tried the same lameness so don't bother humiliating yourself.
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
But you accept their are absolute universal laws of logic?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10965
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Lmfao and are you so stupid you actually fell for this?
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
It does if you let the Bible explain it.
Man has been in rebellion since Eve's sin in the Garden of Eden.
Since that time, mankind has been trying to suppress the knowledge of God.
Usually by lying to themselves and convincing themselves the lie is true.
They got so successful that at one point, God flooded the earth.
They are also getting to the same point again, which is a sign that Jesus Second Coming is about here.
As in the days of Noah etc...
So it all makes perfect sense.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10966
Jan 22, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
The reason you reject the gospel is because it demands more than you are willing to give up.
As you just saw, I'd have to sacrifice commonsense and common decency to join you and worship such a god.
mtimber wrote:
To justify that, you try to attribute Gods character as immoral, using His standards of absolute morality, which you cannot account for as an atheist, to try to justify your own sin.
Your god is less moral than you or I, assuming that you would also never torture anybody.
Thinking

Huntingdon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10967
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Try that again without the errors.
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
But it gave others societies pleasure, where they acting immorally if they defined their own standard?

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10968
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

mtimber wrote:
According to your worldview, he is just a distant relation to a rock.
None of us has made that comment - just you.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10969
Jan 22, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

mtimber wrote:
How do you account for logic in an atheistic universe?
I can't.

How do you account for a god?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 10,281 - 10,300 of20,851
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••