Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Apr 25, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Psychology Today

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Comments (Page 493)

Showing posts 9,841 - 9,860 of21,369
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Northpal

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10491
Jan 16, 2013
 
Religion will cease to exist sometime in the 21st century. Replaced by the jew bolshevik atheism - yea!
Henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10492
Jan 16, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
Will Atheism defeat religion by 2038?
This is topic of this thread and a very interesting too, because someone has stick out his or her neck and made a definite "prediction" or "prophesy".
It is easier to understand such things by past examples, I would try to do so.
I would like to pose a different question: What happened to so called Socialism and Communism?
A. Could any one say in 1960 s and 1970 s that "Communism and Socialism” would be dead by 1990 s?:
I think not even the "Most committed Capitalist" could make such a remark. In 60 s and 70 s the Socialism and Communism was the "Hot word". It was spreading like wild fire and new nations (mostly poor nations of Asia and Africa and Eastern Europe) were consumed by it.
Murmuring against it in Hungary was quenched in One Day,
Soft revolt against it in Chezslovakia was crushed in One Day.
Same thing happened in the case of Poland and Solidarity in 1970 s.
In UNO, the "Capitalist countries" were in minority and were only surviving thru Veto" Power.
In books and lectures and seminars and debates, there was no way in which any one could prove that Capitalism was a better system than Socialism or Communism.
B. What led to the so quick demise of the Socialism and / or Capitalism?
If you ask "capitalists" they would say that USSR was "duped" to spend too much on arms in the arm race with USA and became bankrupt.
Other people would give other reasons.
According to me, the Socialism and Capitalism both had a deadly flaw that they were against basic human nature!! And any thing against Basic human nature can only be enforced by outside force and not by the will and heart of people.
The moment this pressure is removed, people would revolt against it. That is how every country where Socialism or communism was practiced went under dictatorship and police and military brutality.
Both these philosophies therefore were destined for failure and it became clear "when they were at a pinnacle of their powers".
But on ground it happened when Russia invaded Afghanistan in 1979!!. That was the "end" of their "Moral Superiority and Leadership" in the world.
A world superpower invading a small and poor country with no justification and with no provocation?
They lost the respect of the world … and when Gorbachev removed the pressure that was propping up the regime, the whole structure collapsed to the ground.
That gives us a postulate "Any system which is against Basic Human Nature" is bound to fail, its life is limited.
D. Is Atheism not against Basic Human Nature?
I am asking this question now, because in my view Atheism is against basic human nature. No one in his or her right mind would ever believe that this huge Universe and every thing in it just came out by itself, without any plan, design, purpose or Creator at the back of it.
Different religions have different models for this Creator and this "confusion" has given a temporary platform for these Atheists to come out and dare to "predict" the date by which they will defeat the religion.
(Contd.)
Atheists are not having to defeat any religions, Don Quichote has defeated all religions long ago! Only analphabetism is slowing Atheism.
Henry

Bad Langensalza, Germany

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10493
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The serpent was right wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that you have no proof that this god exists.
God never existed!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10494
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It seems that some atheists want to claim the moral high ground in society.

What puzzles me is why they would care?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10495
Jan 16, 2013
 
Henry wrote:
<quoted text>
God never existed!
Are you omniscient?
Thinking

Huntingdon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10496
Jan 16, 2013
 
Do you want to claim the low ground?
mtimber wrote:
It seems that some atheists want to claim the moral high ground in society.
What puzzles me is why they would care?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10497
Jan 16, 2013
 
Thinking wrote:
Do you want to claim the low ground?
<quoted text>
Can you define the low ground and give a rational explanation as to why it is low ground?
bloomoon

Santa Fe, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10498
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and I never said ID was a fallacy. A fallacy is a misleading or unsound argument.
ID isn't an "argument", it's just not science. Come up with some verifiable predictions that allow ID to be tested and clearly state the null hypothesis for these tests and then we can all consider ID on it's merits. Until you do that, you're just blowing smoke.
Is science omipotent?

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10499
Jan 16, 2013
 
sickofit wrote:
<quoted text>
I posted fact LIAR.....Your insane....I will pick facts and truth over a nazi like religion who at its core is hate filled racist and bigoted and only wants to cotnrol and surpress people.
Anyway as you religous freaks die off this world gets better.....THAT IS ANOTHER FACT.
Are you trying to convince me or yourself?

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10500
Jan 16, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you define the low ground and give a rational explanation as to why it is low ground?
Killing witches.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10501
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

bloomoon wrote:
<quoted text>
Is science omipotent?
No. Neither is it omniscient, which is what you were really attempting to ask.

But it is the only method we have of gleaning any testable / verifiable understanding about how reality functions.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10502
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Killing witches.
Why is killing witches wrong?

As an atheist you have no reason to hold that moral view...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10503
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Neither is it omniscient, which is what you were really attempting to ask.
But it is the only method we have of gleaning any testable / verifiable understanding about how reality functions.
You can verify abiogenesis?

Empirically?
EdSed

Wishaw, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10505
Jan 16, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is killing witches wrong?
As an atheist you have no reason to hold that moral view...
Atheists aren't less moral than religionists.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10506
Jan 16, 2013
 
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Neither is it omniscient, which is what you were really attempting to ask.
But it is the only method we have of gleaning any testable / verifiable understanding about how reality functions.
You do not need an intercessor whether it be religion or science to define and validate reality for you. As a co-creator with God, you already possess that knowledge. Being is its own justification.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10507
Jan 16, 2013
 
EdSed wrote:
<quoted text>Atheists aren't less moral than religionists.
Why should an atheist care if they are less or more moral?

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10508
Jan 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should an atheist care if they are less or more moral?
Why are you asking a string of tedious questions rather than trying to make an actual point?

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10509
Jan 16, 2013
 
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should an atheist care if they are less or more moral?
Because we are human.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10510
Jan 16, 2013
 
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you asking a string of tedious questions rather than trying to make an actual point?
Make one first.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10511
Jan 16, 2013
 
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you asking a string of tedious questions rather than trying to make an actual point?
They are not tedious, but they are challenging.

Can you answer them?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 9,841 - 9,860 of21,369
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••