Like I said before, show us with your mighty intelligence where in the defintion of "lack of belief in god" is your example of intolerance & mass murder?<quoted text>
Read my previous posts about atheism intolerence and other people's posts also.
The examples of atheist societies in the 20th century have been one of intolerence, genocide, persecution, mass murder, etc...
The answer is that it is not, because you are a liar, lying about atheism.
Once again, show us where in the definition of atheism is asks us all to commit mass murder...<quoted text>
When atheists get in power in a country, they end up being even worse than the rulers of theocracies like Iran or saudi Arabia.
Just look at the USSR, China, Cambodia, Cuba, etc... where the state was atheist. Atheism is more risky to individual freedom than religion now.
It's probably because you're an idiot who doesn't actually know the definition of atheism is.<quoted text>
I am not Christian and I do not have a religion, so talking to me about the Bible is like pissing in the wind. I just maintain that atheist militants are just as intolerent as religious zealots.
If you did you would realise that nobody kills in the name of atheism. There are no instructions within atheism that say we must kill hundred of thousands of people - this is where you are lying.. On the other hand religion is the cause of many many proven atrocities throughout history.
Reality is not formed upon opinion, reality is formed by science, evidence and experimentation.<quoted text>
We need a mixture of different opinions, and not one in control.
Also, why atheists keep on refering to the Bible as if Christianity was the only belief on earth, and their only opposition? What about Buddhism, Sikhism, Paganism, etc...?
Religion is pure fiction and has no intellectual merit or value to society.
The problem is that most people in the world are uneducated about science, like yourself, and seem to think that religion and science are equal, when they are not.