Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

There are 24181 comments on the Psychology Today story from Apr 25, 2012, titled Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038. In it, Psychology Today reports that:

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Psychology Today.

rio

Bromley, UK

#10048 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =uNtBkOXItqwXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
rio

Bromley, UK

#10049 Dec 29, 2012
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
No projection here, just an observation of YOU.
Just another unregistered troll with an anonymous proxy server, a garden variety, dime a dozen....troll.
You too are getting into a strop now!

Jeez, these atheists aren't a happy bunch, are they?

Registration on Topix isn't necessary

I don't have proxy server, nor do I need one...

If I am a troll, so are you Love...
rio

Bromley, UK

#10050 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
None yet. Call it preemptively clarification.
So, you wanted me to answer a question you haven't asked yet?

A bit silly, no? Are you sure you haven't abused some substance tonight?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10051 Dec 29, 2012
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =QHUbIGLj1BIXX
So many fallacies and in a poorly written and animated video. Poorly animated because it is lacking any effort. Fallacies would take a tone of bytes to cover, luckily they have all been addressed so often, and for so long, it would be redundant to point them out anyway.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10052 Dec 29, 2012
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you wanted me to answer a question you haven't asked yet?
A bit silly, no? Are you sure you haven't abused some substance tonight?
No, preemptive is not silly, it's preemptive, and I said it was clarification. However, I did just point out that the video you posted sucked, and gave excellent details as to why it did, care to attempt to address them or are you just trolling?

Since: Apr 08

Watford, UK

#10057 Dec 30, 2012
MUQ wrote:
If any Muslim kills any innocent infidel, he should be given death penalty.
How do you define "innocent"?
rio

Bromley, UK

#10058 Dec 30, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, preemptive is not silly, it's preemptive, and I said it was clarification. However, I did just point out that the video you posted sucked, and gave excellent details as to why it did, care to attempt to address them or are you just trolling?
Well, the video you posted sucked as well, so I thought you would like mine which is in a similar vein.
No, I don't care to address them.
Now what was the question?

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#10059 Dec 30, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
The events of 9/11 and who was really at the back of it have never been fully investigated and analyzed.
The fall of WTC-1 and WTC-2 and WTC-7 , a 47 story building which collapsed like a pack of cards, even when no plane hit itÂ….. are still to be explained scientifically and convincingly.
It was a big conspiracy and no one knows who was responsible for it. Double cross might not be ruled out altogether.
The case was decided based on TV Evidence!!
The guilty were charged and punished, without any one being convicted in any court of law.
I only think that our Grandchildren might know who was really behind 9/11 incident, when the info comes out.
You are just another conspiracy nutter who knows nothing about Physics, Material Science and Math.
jacktheladat1

Northampton, UK

#10060 Dec 30, 2012
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you.
The winner gets the spoils and also writes the history books. Sad.
Deeper research is required regarding the pablum we are fed as children and witness on the silver screen.
You are a reader too, kudos.
I have only ever read non-fiction since leaving school. That translates into I've never read the Bible for more than fifty years. For fiction I read our daily newspapers.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10061 Dec 30, 2012
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the video you posted sucked as well, so I thought you would like mine which is in a similar vein.
No, I don't care to address them.
Now what was the question?
So those are your points, which mean you don't know anything, which is not a huge surprise. I don't make money on my vids, I recommend you don't try to either, also don't try to make money on your brain .... that I can't sympathize with.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10062 Dec 30, 2012
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't assert much and I even deny less, so tell me where I go wrong.
Right now, I could do with a laugh...
Oh, and your video proves you were just lying here. Love it when you liars just jump out into the open like that.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#10063 Dec 30, 2012
jacktheladat1 wrote:
<quoted text>I have only ever read non-fiction since leaving school. That translates into I've never read the Bible for more than fifty years. For fiction I read our daily newspapers.
Lol....I try to stay away from the newspapers....but CNN is good. Most TV has gone downhill since Star Trek TOS;0)
jacktheladat1

Northampton, UK

#10064 Dec 30, 2012
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol....I try to stay away from the newspapers....but CNN is good. Most TV has gone downhill since Star Trek TOS;0)
In UK we are legally obliged to posses a licence to watch TV, either on-line or otherwise. At this time of the year I would simply love to be in a country Oliver Cromwell had visions of - NO religions. Roll-on 6th Jan, the official end of Christmas. And we profess to be an intelligent species? Not even a poor joke!
rio

Bromley, UK

#10066 Dec 30, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So those are your points, which mean you don't know anything, which is not a huge surprise. I don't make money on my vids, I recommend you don't try to either, also don't try to make money on your brain .... that I can't sympathize with.
You don't seem to know much yourself here.
You keep going round and round in circles and try to look very esoteric.
So much that I have quite a laugh, just playing with you.
You take yourself far too seriously and I just take the piss of you, can't you see?? LOL
rio

Bromley, UK

#10067 Dec 30, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and your video proves you were just lying here. Love it when you liars just jump out into the open like that.
How am I lying?

I just posted the link to a video that matched the silly one you posted.

Have a laugh, and try farting from time to time if the intestinal pressure is getting too much!! LOL

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10070 Dec 30, 2012
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't seem to know much yourself here.
You keep going round and round in circles and try to look very esoteric.
So much that I have quite a laugh, just playing with you.
You take yourself far too seriously and I just take the piss of you, can't you see?? LOL
So, you're trying to be a troll. Sorry, but T-Town is still way more entertaining than you.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#10071 Dec 30, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
And I think you know "every thing" about Physics, Material Science and Math!!
That is why such experts are so easy to get bamboozled when presented with TV Video Images!!
As I said:-
You are just another conspiracy nutter who knows nothing about Physics, Material Science and Math.

“Right click Left click Yay!”

Since: Dec 10

Nehwon

#10072 Dec 30, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
"Innocent" in our discussion is one who has not broken any law of the land or done any crime which involves interference from the state.
I am not on a "legal" or "literary" discussion about innocence. This is lay man's forum mind you.
So, in your layman's opinion, who does the law serve?
The state or the people?
If there is a conflict between the state and the people, which is more important?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#10075 Dec 30, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
And I also said that you know "too much" about Physics, Material Science and Math.
Too Much knowledge is "as dangerous" as too Little, so we are on the same boat!!
That's just pure stupidity. You are embarrassed for not knowing something so you try to make it sound like those who do know something you don't are just as bad off? That's making excuses for your ignorance and nothing more.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#10076 Dec 30, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Odd, why do you assume I know something I readily admit I don't know?
Appears to me like you're just dodging the burden of proof, really. So, from now on I can legitimately consider you a liar, so can anyone else, since you continue to play these childish games.
I have no burden to prove what you already know.

If you say you don't know it, you are either stupid or lying, or both.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 17 min replaytime 66,924
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr replaytime 28,533
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 3 hr replaytime 3,466
is it ever right to hate Christians as a group? 14 hr Superwilly 19
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) 18 hr superwilly 457
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) Apr 22 IB DaMann 5,975
News Unholy? Atheists should embrace the science of ... Apr 20 Eagle 12 9
More from around the web