Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

There are 24182 comments on the Psychology Today story from Apr 25, 2012, titled Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038. In it, Psychology Today reports that:

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Psychology Today.

MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#9540 Dec 4, 2012
Which “Sword” the Prophet Used against his enemies: Part-57

Our prophet was not only a preacher. He was also an able administrator and a just ruler.

Those who have experience of administration know when to act tough and when to act with leniency. A King, Ruler and President knows which criminal to pardon and which to get executed. Those who do not have this experience may only speak in idealistic terms. Such idealistic persons are never able to administer any country or state with efficiency.

Beside so many “Swords” which we have mentioned earlier on this thread. He also had a sword of steel. When no other sword worked and the only solution was to wield the sword of steel, he used that also.

Any one who has read his biography knows that how reluctantly he had to use it. We present below, some of these cases, where prophet had to use the sword of steel.

C. The Case of : UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET

UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET was an influential chief of Makkah. He was one of the strongest opponent of Prophet when he was preaching his mission in Makkah. He used to taunt and make fun of prophet whenever he used to address people or was giving any sermon.

On one occasion when Prophet was praying in Kaaba and was in the act of prostration, this stone hearted man, asked some one to get intestines and other rejected parts of a slain camel to put on the back of prophet. Due to this weight, prophet was unable to sit-up from prostration. UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET and his group were laughing and enjoying the scene.

Some one informed Fatima the daughter of prophet who came running and removed the filth from his back. When prophet finished his prayer and lifted his hands towards sky and said “O Allah! You take care of UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET , Abu JAHL….and a few others” This filled all these persons with fear.

UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET was with the army of Makkan when they went for the battle of Badr, he was captured during the battle. He was being taken to Madina, when one night prophet saw him joking and laughing and as if his captivity had not made any change in his attitude towards life.

So prophet ordered that he be executed and he along with another captive (whose case is next) was executed.

The prophet had to use “steel sword on some one” when he was convinced that he should be made an example for others. We abide by his judgment.


D. The Case of : NADHER BIN HARITH

He was also one of the prominent person of Makkah and a very staunch enemy of Islam and prophet. When the stories of prophets were revealed in Quran, he used to say that these are nothing but tales of past and imaginary stories.

Then he went to Syria and Iran and brought from there books of their folklore and old stories. These he used to recite during nigh gathering of Makkah people, so as to wean them away from listening to Quran. Some commentators say that he was the person mentioned in 31:6-7, which read:

“But there are, among men, those who purchase idle tales, without knowledge (for meaning) to mislead (men) from the path of Allah and ridicule (on the Path): for such there will be a humiliating penality. When our signs are rehearsed to such a one, he turns away in arrogance, as if he heard them not, as if there was deafness inboth his ears: announce to him a grieveious Penality”

NADHER BIN HARITH also took part in the battle of Badr, and was taken captive during the war. He was also one whom prophet ordered to be killed along with UQBAH BIN MU”EET.

After his death, his daughter wrote an obituary for him in poem where she said “O prophet of Allah, NADHER also deserved from your mercy as you did for your other kins….” When prophet heard it, he said, if I had heard it before, I would have spared his life.

But what was done, it cannot be taken back.
Thinking

Farnham, UK

#9541 Dec 5, 2012
Not interested in what you're selling.
mohammed was just another murderous paedophile.
MUQ wrote:
Which “Sword” the Prophet Used against his enemies: Part-57
Our prophet was not only a preacher. He was also an able administrator and a just ruler.
Those who have experience of administration know when to act tough and when to act with leniency. A King, Ruler and President knows which criminal to pardon and which to get executed. Those who do not have this experience may only speak in idealistic terms. Such idealistic persons are never able to administer any country or state with efficiency.
Beside so many “Swords” which we have mentioned earlier on this thread. He also had a sword of steel. When no other sword worked and the only solution was to wield the sword of steel, he used that also.
Any one who has read his biography knows that how reluctantly he had to use it. We present below, some of these cases, where prophet had to use the sword of steel.
C. The Case of : UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET
UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET was an influential chief of Makkah. He was one of the strongest opponent of Prophet when he was preaching his mission in Makkah. He used to taunt and make fun of prophet whenever he used to address people or was giving any sermon.
On one occasion when Prophet was praying in Kaaba and was in the act of prostration, this stone hearted man, asked some one to get intestines and other rejected parts of a slain camel to put on the back of prophet. Due to this weight, prophet was unable to sit-up from prostration. UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET and his group were laughing and enjoying the scene.
Some one informed Fatima the daughter of prophet who came running and removed the filth from his back. When prophet finished his prayer and lifted his hands towards sky and said “O Allah! You take care of UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET , Abu JAHL….and a few others” This filled all these persons with fear.
UQBAH BIN ABU MU’EET was with the army of Makkan when they went for the battle of Badr, he was captured during the battle. He was being taken to Madina, when one night prophet saw him joking and laughing and as if his captivity had not made any change in his attitude towards life.
So prophet ordered that he be executed and he along with another captive (whose case is next) was executed.
The prophet had to use “steel sword on some one” when he was convinced that he should be made an example for others. We abide by his judgment.
D. The Case of : NADHER BIN HARITH
He was also one of the prominent person of Makkah and a very staunch enemy of Islam and prophet. When the stories of prophets were revealed in Quran, he used to say that these are nothing but tales of past and imaginary stories.
Then he went to Syria and Iran and brought from there books of their folklore and old stories. These he used to recite during nigh gathering of Makkah people, so as to wean them away from listening to Quran. Some commentators say that he was the person mentioned in 31:6-7, which read:
“But there are, among men, those who purchase idle tales, without knowledge (for meaning) to mislead (men) from the path of Allah and ridicule (on the Path): for such there will be a humiliating penality. When our signs are rehearsed to such a one, he turns away in arrogance, as if he heard them not, as if there was deafness inboth his ears: announce to him a grieveious Penality”
NADHER BIN HARITH also took part in the battle of Badr, and was taken captive during the war. He was also one whom prophet ordered to be killed along with UQBAH BIN MU”EET.
After his death, his daughter wrote an obituary for him in poem where she said “O prophet of Allah, NADHER also deserved from your mercy as you did for your other kins….” When prophet heard it, he said, if I had heard it before, I would have spared his life.
But what was done, it cannot be taken back.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#9542 Dec 5, 2012
Imagine the following.

Man walks up to MUQ in the street. He is wide eyed, sweating profusely, and mumbling about prophets.

He sees Muq, grabs hold of his shirt, and says to him:

"Voices in my head are saying to me to kill people who don't believe me. The voices are telling me new revelations of allah. If you dont believe me you will burn in hell fire. The voices tell me to keep slaves to allah in my basement. They will become my wives. Do you think I am crazy?"

Muq: "No, you are a great man. You are the noblest person who has ever lived."

The voices were delighted with their new slave. And they went off into the sunset and lived happily ever after. The end.
Thinking

Farnham, UK

#9546 Dec 5, 2012
mohammed spam. Thought you lot were bacon dodgers?
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron (this is as far as my civil upbringing will allow me to go) the topic of this forum is "atheism to defeat religion by 2038"...so the word religion is very much present in the topic under discussion!!
What is wrong if we mention prophets of God under religious column? I have already commented that it is Atheism which by all probability will be no where to be seen, just like Communism, Socialism, Marxism and so many other isms.
All these seem to have a very short life, the religions have survived from the very beginning of human civilization and shall be around till the last day of Human civilization.
It is atheism, about which you should worry about.
I hope this has gone above your head, Moron!!
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#9547 Dec 5, 2012
MUQ wrote:
You have not answered my question as to what was the name of religion of all past prophets? It was not Judaism, it was not Buddhism, it was not Hinduism, it was not Christianity, then what are we left with?
There are hundreds of religions

Not just the ones you mention.

There are the abrhaamic ones, indian, chinese, japanese, vietnamese, korean, new religious movements, scientology, new age, neopagan, etc.

You keep on looking at things through the very narrow blinkers of muhammed.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#9548 Dec 5, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
serial killers and war criminals, I think you will find most of "Fathers of Nations" in the same list. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Kennedy and almost every US President and Prime ministers and Presidents and most dictators would find the place in that "roughish gallery".
The difference is that your "prophet" is supposed to be better than your average war criminal. You would think Allah, with time on his hands, would be able to pick someone who people werent going think is a peado and serial killer.

Your "God" did nothing in the first 97,000 years of modern homo sapiens. Then he picks on the most barbaric, most primitive and most degenerate of our species. And gives his "revelations" to these savages.

You have got to be kidding me. Wake up.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#9549 Dec 5, 2012
btw I disagree with your assertion that presidents of the US and prime ministers of britain are war criminals. I think this is just a diversion tactic cause you dont want to admit to muhammed's crimes.
Thinking

Farnham, UK

#9550 Dec 5, 2012
Correct. Even if they are, mohammed is a role model to be avoided at all costs.
Adam wrote:
btw I disagree with your assertion that presidents of the US and prime ministers of britain are war criminals. I think this is just a diversion tactic cause you dont want to admit to muhammed's crimes.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#9551 Dec 5, 2012
This is an atheist forum and you are here to spam and troll. And you know it. That's it.

You animals worship a savage child raping prophet and I wipe my @ss with the silky smooth pages of the Quran. The Quran it seems really attract sht! Just go to any Mosque or look in your mirror for proof of that.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron (this is as far as my civil upbringing will allow me to go) the topic of this forum is "atheism to defeat religion by 2038"...so the word religion is very much present in the topic under discussion!!
What is wrong if we mention prophets of God under religious column? I have already commented that it is Atheism which by all probability will be no where to be seen, just like Communism, Socialism, Marxism and so many other isms.
All these seem to have a very short life, the religions have survived from the very beginning of human civilization and shall be around till the last day of Human civilization.
It is atheism, about which you should worry about.
I hope this has gone above your head, Moron!!

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#9552 Dec 5, 2012
WTF are you smking? There are thosands of religions with hundreds of thousands of so called prophets. There were Jewish prophets, Christian prophes, Hindu prophets, Shinto Prophets, Druidic Prophets and I could go on and on.

The one prophet you animlas worship stole from the Jewish, Christian and Hindu prophets so he could Prophet. Thier holy writings outdate yours by even thousands of years. For you animals to be considered even remotely correct you MUST show artifacs that have Mose and Jesus for example agreeing wtih the Islamic ta and not the OT and NT take.

You know you can't provide this. It is sad you animals are under the threat of death to remain in Islam.

I pity yo. One day you will end up blowing yourself up for Allah yes?
MUQ wrote:
To: Mr. Andre

F. Back to original question:
You have not answered my question as to what was the name of religion of all past prophets? It was not Judaism, it was not Buddhism, it was not Hinduism, it was not Christianity, then what are we left with?
Andre

Durban, South Africa

#9553 Dec 5, 2012
MUQ wrote:
To: Mr. Andre
I went thru your long post and instead of answering it point by point, I would post a simple reply touching the basic question at stack.
A. Proper Approach:
I think I can trace your dilemma, instead of taking a broader view point, you want to justify your own teachings.
When you become narrow minded, you will not see the full picture.
In such cases, you should start with the Basic Question, Why there are so many religions in the world?
Or rather when the Creator of all human beings is one, how there could be different religions?
B. Why Different Religions?:
If there were different Creators, one who made Indians, another who made Chinese and another for Arabs and Europeans and Jews…. Then it is understandable that all these people have totally different religions.
Or if all the religions were at the result of people's own thinking and imaginations, then also it was understandable if they all were so different from each other.
But when all these religions claim that they are based on revelation which their originators received from the Creator of the universe, there must be some commonality in these religions.
Some differences due to local conditions and state of civilizations of countries / customs are expected, but not so fundamental differences so as to totally incompatible with each other.
My arguments therefore did make a common sense and they were based on reason and logic.
C. Abolish the Law:
On the other hand, you instead of tackling the problem on reason and logic went to quote extensively from Bible and expound the theology of Christianity.
There was no shortcoming in the Law by itself; people did not follow it because they did not want to follow it.
Whatever changes needed due to changing circumstances, might be covered by modifying it, but to abolish the law altogether, so that no one is found guilty of breaking the law, looks very strange.
D. Is "No Law" can work in other fields too?
Why can't the same principle work in other spheres too? Do we not see so many "imperfect" laws on Economy / Taxation / Traffic / Law and Order…. Since no one is able to follow them fully, would it be OK to abolish the entire laws so that no one is every found guilty of breaking any law?
So the Christian principle of abolishing law entirely is based unreasonable, and illogical.
E. No Law for not preached by any Prophet of God:
And more so, this idea was not preached by Jesus Christ, a prophet of God, but by St. Paul, who did not meet Jesus during his life time and did not learn any thing from him.
F. Back to original question:
You have not answered my question as to what was the name of religion of all past prophets? It was not Judaism, it was not Buddhism, it was not Hinduism, it was not Christianity, then what are we left with?
Great stuff ... we are back to irrelevant responses to the points you so nicely set out in your previous post and to which I responded point for point.
Unfortunately my friend, your totally irrelevant responses make any further reasoned discussion impossible.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#9554 Dec 5, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
This is an atheist forum and you are here to spam and troll. And you know it. That's it.
Actually, that's not always true, but it is a common misconception.

The top of your page probably says -

"Posted in the Atheism Forum"

(right under the title of the thread)

However you need to look down at the bottom section of the page right underneath the mini-list of current threads in the forum where it says -

"Related Topix Forums: World News, Religion, Europe, United Kingdom"

Which is the list of all the other Forums where this particular thread is cross-posted. Each Topix user will be seeing this thread from their own perspective.
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#9555 Dec 5, 2012
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, that's not always true, but it is a common misconception.
The top of your page probably says -
"Posted in the Atheism Forum"
(right under the title of the thread)
However you need to look down at the bottom section of the page right underneath the mini-list of current threads in the forum where it says -
"Related Topix Forums: World News, Religion, Europe, United Kingdom"
Which is the list of all the other Forums where this particular thread is cross-posted. Each Topix user will be seeing this thread from their own perspective.
And I would add that there are no humanist or rationalist forums on Topix.(No ethics forum either). Atheism is a term related to religion, which might be seen by some as reason enough for religion to be discussed. What Topix really needs is a Rationalist or Humanist forum where no superstition (including religion) would be relevant. Perhaps mentioning superstition might reasonably be called trolling threads exclusive to forums entitled 'Rationalist' or 'Humanist'? However, threads might still be cross-referenced with other forums as Hedonist describes.(JMHO).

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/04/b...
Bristol (England) University Christian Union (BUCU, see link above,) have completely lost the plot. This is Jesus & Mo's take on it...
http://www.jesusandmo.net/2012/12/05/treat/

I think that most people (the most rational people) have left Christian unions leaving only the most fundamentalist and daft.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#9556 Dec 5, 2012
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
You are entitled to your opinion. But if you had the opportunity to rule any country, you will not make that remark.
And coming to serial killers and war criminals, I think you will find most of "Fathers of Nations" in the same list. George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Kennedy and almost every US President and Prime ministers and Presidents and most dictators would find the place in that "roughish gallery".
As one renowned historian wrote "It is not the size of his victories but rather the permanency of his teachings and his influence so long after his death that demand our respect".
There is no dearth of great warriors and great kings and great kingdoms in human history, but most of them are found only in pages of history books.
But our prophet's mission gains momentum with each passing date.
You should be ashamed of yourself, if you cannot see this fact right in front of your very eyes!!
I suggest you broaden your use of the English language by looking up the terms; strawman argument, comparing apples to oranges, deflection, red herring, logical fallacy, empirical proof, proving a negative,projection, etc.

I would also recommend that you learn to focus, your posts are always rambling off the point and I've yet to see you answer a question in a straightforward manner.
MUQ

Qatif, Saudi Arabia

#9557 Dec 5, 2012
Which “Sword” the Prophet Used against his enemies: Part-58

Our prophet was not only a preacher. He was also an able administrator and a just ruler.

Those who have experience of administration know when to act tough and when to act with leniency. A King, Ruler and President knows which criminal to pardon and which to get executed. Those who do not have this experience may only speak in idealistic terms. Such idealistic persons are never able to administer any country or state with efficiency.

Beside so many “Swords” which we have mentioned earlier on this thread. He also had a sword of steel. When no other sword worked and the only solution was to wield the sword of steel, he used that also.

Any one who has read his biography knows that how reluctantly he had to use it. We present below, some of these cases, where prophet had to use the sword of steel.

The case of: UBAI’ BIN KHALAF OF MAKKAH

UBAI’ BIN KHALAF was a resident of Makkah, he was one of the most bitter enemy of Mohammad during his days of Preaching in Makkah. There were many people in Makkah who did not accept his message and rejected him and his message. Most of these people however respected the Prophet personally and aside from theological differences, did not use abusive language against prophet.

There were few people , however, who exceeded this bound and crossed all limits of social behaviour and decency when opposing him and his message, amongst such person was this UBAI’ BIN KHALAF, he used to taunt the prophet and used to lampoon his personality.

He used to come to say to the prophet, I have a horse and I feed him grain every day, so that he become big and powerful, I will ride on it and kill you from that horse….prophet used to keep quite listening to his boasts….when the things continued for many times….one day Prophet said, INSHALLAH, I will kill you one day.

UBAI’ BIN KHALAF got very much scared hearing these words of prophet, and he went away quietly thinking very hard. He missed the Battle of Badr some how….but he was with Makkan army when the Battle of Ohud took place….he was riding on his “fit and powerful” horse.

When the Muslim army went into disarray…and false news of prophet being killed spread like wildfire, this UBAI’ BIN KHALAF went in search of prophet saying “If Mohammad slipped from me this day, I will never get another chance to fulfill my vow”

He went on searching for prophet on the battle field, until he found prophet injured and surrounded by his few followers, He charged towards the prophet asking him to come forward and fight…..the followers wanted to stop him, but the prophet said,“No, let him come”.

When he reached near the prophet, prophet took a small spear from one of his companions, dodged his weapon and hit him with the spear which just scratched his skin near the neck. He made a loud noise and went away shouting “Mohammad has killed me,. Mohammad has killed me!”

He went back with the Makkan army howling and crying….Abu Sufyan, The Commander of Makkan army,, admonished him saying “It is only a facial wound, why you are making so much hue and cry about it”

“You do not know in how much pain I am” said UBAI’ BIN KHALAF “Mohammad had said to me in Makkah, Inshallah , I will kill you, by God, if he would have even spit on me, I would die”.

He went on crying and howling in pain till he died from that would during return journey to Makkah a few days later.

UBAI’ BIN KHALAF holds the dubious distinction of being the only human, to be killed at the hands of Prophet. Looser and hopeless is really the one who had to pick the “Sword of Steel” from the hands of prophet, ignoring all other “Swords” that he wielded.

Such was UBAI’ BIN KHALAF and such was his inglorious end.

Since: Mar 11

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

#9558 Dec 5, 2012
But without all those logical fallacies and spam Muq would have nothing left to say.
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
I suggest you broaden your use of the English language by looking up the terms; strawman argument, comparing apples to oranges, deflection, red herring, logical fallacy, empirical proof, proving a negative,projection, etc.
I would also recommend that you learn to focus, your posts are always rambling off the point and I've yet to see you answer a question in a straightforward manner.

Since: Mar 11

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

#9559 Dec 5, 2012
Muhammad was a wealthy merchant who uses Islam to increase his wealth and land grab away from innocent people. He should be called the profit Muhammad.

“Exercise Your Brain”

Since: Jun 07

Planet Earth

#9560 Dec 6, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
But without all those logical fallacies and spam Muq would have nothing left to say.
<quoted text>
*shrugs* Anything that works is fine by me;0)

How do we enforce the rules? Knifepoint, gunpoint or arsenic and old lace? It will always come down to force.

Since: Mar 11

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

#9561 Dec 6, 2012
It's just entertaining in a way. He believes he is showing Islam in a positive light and always argues that Muhammad was more than just a brutal warlord who executed people who already surrendered. And how does he show this

By post after post showing Muhammad in battle fighting, killing, raping, conquering and taking slaves and several wives one as young as 6, along with several slave girls!

I can see Muq now saying to himself, so these atheists think Muhammad was a brutal warlord? Well read about him conquering this tribe taking slaves and plundering their belongings! Ha! What do you soap using people have to say about the Profit Muhammad now?

Lmfao!
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
*shrugs* Anything that works is fine by me;0)
How do we enforce the rules? Knifepoint, gunpoint or arsenic and old lace? It will always come down to force.
Thinking

Farnham, UK

#9562 Dec 6, 2012
More "special ham"...

Check this out: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-20596854

You need some koranic irrigation.
MUQ wrote:
Which “Sword” the Prophet Used against his enemies: Part-58
Our prophet was not only a preacher. He was also an able administrator and a just ruler.
Those who have experience of administration know when to act tough and when to act with leniency. A King, Ruler and President knows which criminal to pardon and which to get executed. Those who do not have this experience may only speak in idealistic terms. Such idealistic persons are never able to administer any country or state with efficiency.
Beside so many “Swords” which we have mentioned earlier on this thread. He also had a sword of steel. When no other sword worked and the only solution was to wield the sword of steel, he used that also.
Any one who has read his biography knows that how reluctantly he had to use it. We present below, some of these cases, where prophet had to use the sword of steel.
The case of: UBAI’ BIN KHALAF OF MAKKAH
UBAI’ BIN KHALAF was a resident of Makkah, he was one of the most bitter enemy of Mohammad during his days of Preaching in Makkah. There were many people in Makkah who did not accept his message and rejected him and his message. Most of these people however respected the Prophet personally and aside from theological differences, did not use abusive language against prophet.
There were few people , however, who exceeded this bound and crossed all limits of social behaviour and decency when opposing him and his message, amongst such person was this UBAI’ BIN KHALAF, he used to taunt the prophet and used to lampoon his personality.
He used to come to say to the prophet, I have a horse and I feed him grain every day, so that he become big and powerful, I will ride on it and kill you from that horse….prophet used to keep quite listening to his boasts….when the things continued for many times….one day Prophet said, INSHALLAH, I will kill you one day.
UBAI’ BIN KHALAF got very much scared hearing these words of prophet, and he went away quietly thinking very hard. He missed the Battle of Badr some how….but he was with Makkan army when the Battle of Ohud took place….he was riding on his “fit and powerful” horse.
When the Muslim army went into disarray…and false news of prophet being killed spread like wildfire, this UBAI’ BIN KHALAF went in search of prophet saying “If Mohammad slipped from me this day, I will never get another chance to fulfill my vow”
He went on searching for prophet on the battle field, until he found prophet injured and surrounded by his few followers, He charged towards the prophet asking him to come forward and fight…..the followers wanted to stop him, but the prophet said,“No, let him come”.
When he reached near the prophet, prophet took a small spear from one of his companions, dodged his weapon and hit him with the spear which just scratched his skin near the neck. He made a loud noise and went away shouting “Mohammad has killed me,. Mohammad has killed me!”
He went back with the Makkan army howling and crying….Abu Sufyan, The Commander of Makkan army,, admonished him saying “It is only a facial wound, why you are making so much hue and cry about it”
“You do not know in how much pain I am” said UBAI’ BIN KHALAF “Mohammad had said to me in Makkah, Inshallah , I will kill you, by God, if he would have even spit on me, I would die”.
He went on crying and howling in pain till he died from that would during return journey to Makkah a few days later.
UBAI’ BIN KHALAF holds the dubious distinction of being the only human, to be killed at the hands of Prophet. Looser and hopeless is really the one who had to pick the “Sword of Steel” from the hands of prophet, ignoring all other “Swords” that he wielded.
Such was UBAI’ BIN KHALAF and such was his inglorious end.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 21 min Richardfs 45,481
Evidence for God! (Oct '14) 54 min Thinking 541
Christianity isn't based on... (Feb '10) 1 hr Paul WV-Uncle Sam 290
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr New Age Spiritual... 257,123
There are no such things as gods or fairies 4 hr u196533dm 188
What is of greater value for humanity: Chrisita... 6 hr Thinking 427
News Atheist Rev. Gretta Vosper should be terminated... 7 hr Amused 6
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 7 hr karl44 20,239
More from around the web