Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038

There are 24178 comments on the Psychology Today story from Apr 25, 2012, titled Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038. In it, Psychology Today reports that:

My blog posts on religion have attracted a lot of controversy. Religious people are annoyed by my claim that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Psychology Today.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#22703 Jul 30, 2014
Thinking wrote:
The second mohammed the paedo died, your religion split in two.
sunnis and shiites are still murdering each other today: the religion of piss.
<quoted text>
I think Mohommed peaked in his last fight with Frazier.

My dad fought Joe Louis. He lost.

Since: Mar 12

Andheri, India

#22704 Jul 30, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no knowledge about the History of Islam.
And your usage of filthy dirty language about our prophet, shows how uncouth you are.
I usually does not answers posts written in gutter language like yours, just consider it an exception.
You are clearly offended by his post but you should also accept he has made a valid point? Is there any better word that we can use for a person who marries a 6 years old girl at the age of 54?Let us know if any so we may not offend you while describing your beloved prophet.
Magyar 101

Europe

#22705 Jul 31, 2014
Fadu Singh.
There's no polite word for prophet mohammed.
Just child obsessed could be polite enough.

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

#22706 Jul 31, 2014
Growupchildren wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody gives a f*ck what an inbred creationist liar-f*ck thinks an date a fact.
That's why you losers are in the atheism forum, because your own cult is embarrassed by you.
What a lovely person you are. You should be president

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

#22707 Jul 31, 2014
religionisillness wrote:
<quoted text>
You are nut bags and liars who don't know when to shaddap and f*ck off back to your ignorant caves.
There's no such thing as god and there never had been - you are just frightened children, afraid of accepting that nothing lasts forever.
Your problem is that you harm society with your lies and poisonous fantasies.
Cool story bro
religionisillnes s

London, UK

#22709 Jul 31, 2014
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
Cool story bro
coming from the bible seller.
religionisillnes s

London, UK

#22710 Jul 31, 2014
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
What a lovely person you are. You should be president
no such thing as god - only you, in the atheism forum.
Patrick

United States

#22711 Jul 31, 2014
religionisillness wrote:
<quoted text>
coming from the bible seller.
LOL

The Steve Scalise era is off to an embarrassing start.
The Louisiana Republican, who boasted of his deep ties to red-state GOP lawmakers in his recent bid to become majority whip, received a very public drubbing on his first day in the No. 3 slot when his colleagues abandoned leadership’s plans to pass a border security bill.

With their eyes fixed on August recess, GOP leaders were forced to pull the bill Thursday afternoon after rank-and-file lawmakers flipped from “Yes” votes to “No” votes, as the chamber descended into chaos just hours before a month-long recess was supposed to kick off.

The meltdown unfolded just hours after Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) gave his last floor speech as majority leader, ushering in an era of new leadership that pledged to be more efficient. But reality quickly set in that, new leadership aside, conservatives continue to hold enough clout to upend the House agenda — just as they have since Republicans took power in 2011.

Thursday’s setback, however, could be fleeting. Scalise will have an unusually quick chance for redemption because the House is sticking around Friday to try to chart a path forward. Scalise and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), chief deputy majority whip, were huddling with members Thursday evening to try and pick up votes. GOP sources are hopeful small changes to the legislation could garner enough backing to pass it.

Leadership is privately ruling out any drastic changes to the legislation.
The House Rules Committee met Thursday evening to pass a “martial law” bill that would allow same day consideration of any legislative package.
MUQ1

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#22712 Aug 1, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>You are clearly offended by his post but you should also accept he has made a valid point? Is there any better word that we can use for a person who marries a 6 years old girl at the age of 54?Let us know if any so we may not offend you while describing your beloved prophet.
You also have no knowledge about that marriage.

Is it NOT strange that You are objecting after 1400 years, NONE of his worst enemies, neither the general people, nor the parents of Bride, nor ANY of her relative.... no one said any thing bad about that marriage.

How can you FIX titles after 1400 years? Whose friend are you? The Bride or the Bridegroom? Or just having a "Little fun"?

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#22713 Aug 1, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You also have no knowledge about that marriage.
Is it NOT strange that You are objecting after 1400 years, NONE of his worst enemies, neither the general people, nor the parents of Bride, nor ANY of her relative.... no one said any thing bad about that marriage.
How can you FIX titles after 1400 years? Whose friend are you? The Bride or the Bridegroom? Or just having a "Little fun"?
No one objected your prophet because he convinced people that it was Allah's wish and he was the prophet of Allah.That doesn't mean he wasn't a paedophile.Ask any psychologist if your prophet falls short to make it into the category of paedophiles. A paedophile is any adult person who is sexually attracted to prepubescent young children.Where did I go wrong?
By the way this is not the only perversion that your prophet was involved it.He duped the uneducated superstitious Arabs into his self-styled prophecy and lived life like a libertine.
MUQ1

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#22714 Aug 2, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>No one objected your prophet because he convinced people that it was Allah's wish and he was the prophet of Allah.That doesn't mean he wasn't a paedophile.Ask any psychologist if your prophet falls short to make it into the category of paedophiles. A paedophile is any adult person who is sexually attracted to prepubescent young children.Where did I go wrong?
By the way this is not the only perversion that your prophet was involved it.He duped the uneducated superstitious Arabs into his self-styled prophecy and lived life like a libertine.
Why would he convince his Opponents that it was Allah's will?

Your definition is wrong, our prophets had upto eleven wives and all of them were widows and some were even with children. What would you call such a person, who is attracted towards marrying widows?

And his first wife was widowed twice, had two issues, was older than him by 15 years, what would you call such a person.

When you fix your own title or definition on leaders of other faiths, you should be careful.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#22715 Aug 2, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would he convince his Opponents that it was Allah's will?
Your definition is wrong, our prophets had upto eleven wives and all of them were widows and some were even with children. What would you call such a person, who is attracted towards marrying widows?
And his first wife was widowed twice, had two issues, was older than him by 15 years, what would you call such a person.
When you fix your own title or definition on leaders of other faiths, you should be careful.
Are you saying Aisha was a widow before she married Muhammad?Muhammad married widows who were much older than them. He could have accepted them as sisters but he chose to marry all of them which is quite strange.Islam has no such provision for married women to marry widowers.Having 11 sisters is far more acceptable than having 11 wives.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#22716 Aug 2, 2014
By 2038 Europe wont be Christian , cause it will be Islamic by then. Good job Europe.
MUQ1

Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

#22717 Aug 2, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>Are you saying Aisha was a widow before she married Muhammad?Muhammad married widows who were much older than them. He could have accepted them as sisters but he chose to marry all of them which is quite strange.Islam has no such provision for married women to marry widowers.Having 11 sisters is far more acceptable than having 11 wives.
You are talking in a weird language.... that shows how twisted is your mind.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#22719 Aug 2, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are talking in a weird language.... that shows how twisted is your mind.
Another insensible excuse from you to avoid answering my reasonable doubts.

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#22720 Aug 2, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>Another insensible excuse from you to avoid answering my reasonable doubts.
You have only doubts, reasonable or not does not matter and there is no cure for such desease.

Since: Mar 12

Mumbai, India

#22721 Aug 3, 2014
MUQ1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You have only doubts, reasonable or not does not matter and there is no cure for such desease.
A great quote from Anton Szandor Lavey:
"It has been said,'the truth will make men free.' The truth alone has never made anyone free. It is only doubt which will bring mental emancipation."
Asking doubts is a must for a reasonable mind.
Robin

Los Angeles, CA

#22722 Aug 3, 2014
Atheists are pathetic losers who get angry at and judge something that doesnt exist. I am amazed at those wastes of space that they are.
Robin

Los Angeles, CA

#22723 Aug 3, 2014
Atheists remind me of the babbling idiot at the Freak Show, at the local carnival.'STEP RIGHT UP, FOLKS! FOR JUST TWO BITS, ONE FOURTH OF A DOLLAR, HEAR THE BABBLING IDIOT RANT AND RAVE AT NOTHING!'

“SATYAMEV JAYATE-TRUTH WINS ”

Since: Mar 14

JUBAIL, KSA

#22724 Aug 3, 2014
fadu singh wrote:
<quoted text>A great quote from Anton Szandor Lavey:
"It has been said,'the truth will make men free.' The truth alone has never made anyone free. It is only doubt which will bring mental emancipation."
Asking doubts is a must for a reasonable mind.
How do you find truth? Whatever comes in your twisted mind and twisted reasoning might not be truth but falsehood.

How would you separate truth from the falsehood? What are the criterion?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 10 min 0smius 87,204
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 5 hr superwilly 5,811
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Feb 14 ChristineM 4,032
Christianity almost did not happen Feb 12 Quatsch22 1
News Egypt's parliament takes serious actions to com... Feb 12 dollarsbillmom 19
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Feb 10 superwilly 5,154
How To Get To Heaven When You Die (Jan '17) Feb 9 Eagle 12 - 257
More from around the web