In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 51414 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#48943 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You are confusing me with you wife, I understand it’s a symptom of syphilis eating away at you brain. Could also be a bit of alzheimer's making it worse for you.
Well you are often called a liar so I guess you loose.
<quoted text>
Your spelling of a made up word, don’t blame me
Your lies and good JW guesswork are getting letting you down.
<quoted text>
Your lies and good JW guesswork are getting more pathetic.
<quoted text>
Note "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
I just thought I would remind you of the American pledge of allegiance.
Wrong again, it is law but it is not required, as explained to you several times previously by at least 2 different people but your syphilis must be effecting your memory, p.s. love you plagiarism, very telling of your lack of intelligence
<quoted text>
Your lies and good JW guesswork are getting more pathetic. P.S. before you lie about what you don’t understand I suggest you do a little self-education. Your ignorance of British social services is really letting you down.
<quoted text>
Both do, it is there right in front of you whenever you open your WP, how about the control panel language setting in windows, also there. Be a man and live with your idiotic fook ups.
Your lies and good JW guesswork are getting more pathetic, must be the syphilis eating away at the cognitive areas of your brain.
<quoted text>
Correct a constitutional monarchy is a monarchy, in almost the same way that a constitutional monarchy is a constitutional monarchy. However constitutional monarch is a more accurate description of a constitutional monarchy.
<quoted text>
Nope, most of the UK’s parliament is elected. Please try and keep up.
http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-...
Christine!!

-big kiss-

How is my favourite Brit doing?

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#48944 Jun 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
So we pledge to the FLAG and not to God.
Putting aside this pledge isn't REQUIRED.
Compare to the oath required to the Queen in the UK.
Which is REQUIRED.
Of course, you use "required" to mean whatever you want it to mean when you've lost the argument.
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

Lets break it down for the hard of understanding

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America”– yes to the flag

“and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”– so also to “the republic for which it stands, one nation under GOD, indivisible…”

Perhaps you are not fully conversant with the wording of the US pledge of allegiance

The pledge is REQUIRED of children and is LAW in 45 of the 50 states and commonwealths. The pledge is REQUIRED of anyone seeking US nationality.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed a bill to include under god. He stated that "From this day forward, the millions of our school children will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our Nation and our people to the Almighty."
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
"American" is not a language, it's a dialect.
No matter how hard you stomp your cloven feet.
Prove it.

In gathering your proof consider the wording of the software setup process employed by such American industrial giants as Microsoft and IBM. I suppose you could quite legitimately be mentioned in the same sentence as Microsoft and IBM. The sentence would read “Microsoft and IBM, unlike bafy barebutt face…”

I’ll wait…
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the one who is confused, Skanque.
Apparently, the only thing you can remember was the doctor telling you was 'syphilis'.
And clearly you have the imagine of dripping penises lodged firmly in your memory.
And bumping the back of your throat, it seems.

Ignored on the grounds that you have finally lost it and so have to make crap up to fill in the blanks in your mind left by the rather aggressive and virulent strain of syphilis that makes you post like a moron.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#48945 Jun 26, 2013
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
Christine!!
-big kiss-
How is my favourite Brit doing?
You favourite Brit. is doing just great

How’s my fav. Saffa doing?

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#48946 Jun 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't run around too much, you'll end up with what Skanque has got.
Yes it’s success and charisma, both are attributes that your syphilitic addled brain could not understand.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48947 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Lets break it down for the hard of understanding
I don't have to break it down to understand it: it is a PLEDGE of ALLEGIANCE to this country made by citizens of the United States.

Maybe you subjects of the the Queen have difficulty with the concept.

Note the pledge is TO the country and not to any God.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48948 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
The pledge is REQUIRED of children and is LAW
You just told us things required by law aren't required.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48949 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
The pledge is REQUIRED of children and is LAW in 45 of the 50 states and commonwealths.
Nope.

A)*MOST* Laws are for SCHOOLS to lead the pledge
B) Students are required in FOUR states

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48950 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Prove it.
Skanque: it is up to YOU to prove "American" is a language.

That is how it works.

I have already refuted it, by the way.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48951 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
I have even refined that statement and brought to you attention the fact that the UK is a constitutional monarchy as specified by both the royal site and the government
Does that make you correct or does that make me correct?
I have always maintained that the United King_dom was a monarchy from the very first post.

Does that make me look like I have always been correct and that you have wasted everyone's time with hundreds of posts insisting that I was not?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48952 Jun 26, 2013
[QUOTE who="ChristineM"
Wrong again, it is law but it is not required
[/QUOTE]

So at least as far as you are concerned if it is law, it isn't required.

According to you, Skanque.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#48953 Jun 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to break it down to understand it: it is a PLEDGE of ALLEGIANCE to this country made by citizens of the United States.
Maybe you subjects of the the Queen have difficulty with the concept.
Note the pledge is TO the country and not to any God.
Ignored on the grounds that you are a blithering idiot who ignores FACTS and the actual wording of the pledge even when they are pointed out to you in words of one syllable and pretty pictures.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You just told us things required by law aren't required.
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!
Oh sorry, I thought I was replying to your post, not to mine.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
A)*MOST* Laws are for SCHOOLS to lead the pledge
B) Students are required in FOUR states
http://undergod.procon.org/view.resource.php...

From what I see it’s seems a little more than 4 for both schools and students so we can assume you a lying to save face
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Skanque: it is up to YOU to prove "American" is a language.
That is how it works.
I have already refuted it, by the way.
You are confused, you don’t seem to be sure how this works do you? Let me explain, what happens is, if you make a statement then it’s up to you to provide the proof if that statement is called into question.

You made the statement that US English is not a language it is therefore up to you to prove your statement. I have already shown you the several incidences where US English is defined as a language, all you can do about these facts is pretend they don’t exist or lie even when they are displayed on your monitor. That is not my problem but yours, if you get off on deliberate and wilful ignorance and lies then it’s all fine.

Again you seem confused, stamping you foot and ranting is not the same thing as as providing evidence to refute, nope what it is is stamping you foot and ranting.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have always maintained that the United King_dom was a monarchy from the very first post.
Does that make me look like I have always been correct and that you have wasted everyone's time with hundreds of posts insisting that I was not?
This is true in your limited and childish way but consider that you have always gone into full meltdown mode when I have corrected you with the fact that the term as applied to the UK by both the British monarchy and the British government is “constitutional monarchy”. Now I realise that you believe that you know better about the UK than both the British monarchy and the British government but I am afraid I am going to have to disappoint you. In truth your delusional fantasy is simply an effect for rampant syphilis eating away at your cognitive functions
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
So at least as far as you are concerned if it is law, it isn't required.
According to you, Skanque.
Not just me, as I have repeatedly explained, it applies to every single resident of England as specified by the British government. I realise this is a concept that is beyond your limited comprehension but that’s just tough.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48954 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Yes all (maximum) 12 appointed by the church
Majority means half the total number plus one.

The UK Parliament has two houses, the House of Commons and the House of Lords.

Which is the larger House, Skanque?

Let me help, the House of Commons has 650 members.
The House of Lords has 818.

The number of members of Parliment is 1468.

The members of the House are (normally) elected.

So that would be 650.

Half of 1468 is 734... plus one is 735.

How many members of the House of Lords are elected, Skanque?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48955 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Note that the members of the house of parliament and the majority of members
(not all) of the house of lords are elected. A little revision of parliamentary procedure would do you well in your outdated and pedantic arguments
Kind of hard to talk fast when you are writing things down, isn't it Skanque?

Because that was a line of cr@p.

How many members of the House of Lords are elected... now?

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#48956 Jun 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Majority means half the total number plus one.
The UK Parliament has two houses, the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
Which is the larger House, Skanque?
Let me help, the House of Commons has 650 members.
The House of Lords has 818.
The number of members of Parliment is 1468.
The members of the House are (normally) elected.
So that would be 650.
Half of 1468 is 734... plus one is 735.
How many members of the House of Lords are elected, Skanque?
And of those 1488 there are 1384 elected members

It does not matter how you try to wriggle out of it 104 members out of a total of 1488 (even split into 2 houses)

IS NOWHERE CLOSE TO A MAJORITY OR EVEN CLOSE TO HALF
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of hard to talk fast when you are writing things down, isn't it Skanque?
Because that was a line of cr@p.
How many members of the House of Lords are elected... now?
You may consider it whatever you like be we know you are confused and have problems with the English language but that’s besides the point. I have now asked two different english speaking people what they thought of the line, both say it’s fine. And I have asked one Palestinian, one Jew and one Spaniard, All three have English as their second (or third) language and they understood it without problem.

So we can assume the problem is with you.

The number varies but the total number is approximately 760 to 800, and all but a maximum (this also varies) of 104 is elected. So about 675

Again, no matter how you carve that up, it in no way makes a majority.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48957 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And of those 1488 there are 1384 elected members
House of Lords are: appointed.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48958 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
IS NOWHERE CLOSE TO A MAJORITY OR EVEN CLOSE TO HALF
House of Lords = political appointments.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48959 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
You may consider it whatever you like be we know you are confused and have problems with the English language
There is no "American" language.

It is a dialect.

would you like links to the people who insist the earth is flat?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48960 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
And of those 1488 there are 1384 elected members
How members are appointed
"Members of the House of Lords are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister."
http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/whos-...

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#48961 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You favourite Brit. is doing just great
How’s my fav. Saffa doing?
Mandela is still critical, sadly.

But I am okay, too ;)
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#48962 Jun 26, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And of those 1488 there are 1384 elected members
It does not matter how you try to wriggle out of it 104 members out of a total of 1488 (even split into 2 houses)
IS NOWHERE CLOSE TO A MAJORITY OR EVEN CLOSE TO HALF
<quoted text>
You may consider it whatever you like be we know you are confused and have problems with the English language but that’s besides the point. I have now asked two different english speaking people what they thought of the line, both say it’s fine. And I have asked one Palestinian, one Jew and one Spaniard, All three have English as their second (or third) language and they understood it without problem.
So we can assume the problem is with you.
The number varies but the total number is approximately 760 to 800, and all but a maximum (this also varies) of 104 is elected. So about 675
Again, no matter how you carve that up, it in no way makes a majority.
I don't think I agree with you Christine.

Most of the British Parliament aren't elected. Only the 650 of the house of commons. The Lords aren't elected. That is a shame on us and our system - no escaping it.

I went back a page, but maybe I missed you're reasoning. Anyway, you appear to have managed to make Barefoot sound reasonable! That is his style - he just keeps repeating misleading tripe until someone makes a factual error.

Proportionately fewer Lords are hereditary than in the past but most are government appointed. Currently there are 26 bishops. This UKGov found time to debate gay marriage and the PM has 'Faith meetings', but they claimed there was no time for reform of the House of Lords even with a bill ready for voting on that would at least make it more democratic. I think we should abolish the Lords. It is a mess and a national disgrace in my opinion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr replaytime 93,360
News Scientific, Philosophical Case for God's Existe... 5 hr blacklagoon 3 78
News American Atheists terminates its president over... 17 hr Eagle 12 - 19
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Apr 14 blacklagoon 3 4,141
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Apr 14 Into The Night 258,515
News The Anti-Christian Movement Apr 10 blacklagoon 3 11
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) Apr 9 Wisdom of Ages 6,048