In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Spiked

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Comments
46,821 - 46,840 of 47,724 Comments Last updated Sep 4, 2013

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48652
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Richardfs wrote:
You really are as dumb as your avatar looks.
And you are every bit as witty as your snappy comebacks indicate.

The ocean called, DICK...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48653
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
haha still trying to explain away your FAILURE to understand that a monarchy and a constitutional monarchy are two DIFFERENT...
Is a constitutional monarchy a monarchy?

Yes or no?

Put aside the UK has no written constitution...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48654
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
Show where "head of state" is mentioned.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.
Wipe your chins, SuperFAG.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48655
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Change it from what, Aunt Sally?
Is the United KING_dom a monarchy, yes or no?
Playing dumb does not work with people who been "debating" with you for a good number of months. Are you that desperate that you are honestly trying to tell me that you cannot follow an exchange within the same page?

From arguing about the UK's name to its head of state to... well, what next? You are all over the place. You are quite literally spouting out whatever comes to mind irrespective of what you said a day or two ago.

And you know it, manchild, so stop playing dumb.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
SuperFAG writes:
Addressed and refuted. Got anything new?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48656
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Playing dumb does not work with people who been "debating" with you for a good number of months.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.
Is United KING_dom a monarchy? Yes or no?
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48657
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
++
SuperFAG writes:
<quoted text>
Addressed and refuted. Anything new?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is United KING_dom a monarchy? Yes or no?
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.

Manchild runs away.

What are you going to use now? The head of state? The currency? The flag? The borders? The culture? The cuisine? The landmarks? The capital city?

Dance some more, manchild.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48658
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hey, manchild, stop running away from when I quoted you exactly saying:
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
United KING_dom.
Monarchy, yes or no?
Wipe your chin, flies....
Show where "head of state" is mentioned.

Show where "Constitutional monarchy" is mentioned.

I quote you exactly and this is what we see: your lies.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48659
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Addressed and refuted. Anything new?
Kind of hard to refute direct quotes, SuperFAG.

NO one here expects you to admit you were wrong.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48660
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.
Aunt Sally.

What is constitutional monarchy?

Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48661
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
Show where "head of state" is mentioned..
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...

Wipe your chins, Aunt Sally.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48662
May 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of hard to refute direct quotes, SuperFAG.
As you eloquently show by running away from my direct quote of you arguing that the UK is a monarchy by virtue of having "King" in its name with no mention of Constitutional monarchy or the head of state.

You really need to look up something called "hypocrisy".
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
NO one here expects you to admit you were wrong.
<quoted text>
++
SuperFAG writes:
<quoted text>
No one here expects you to admit that having and being are completely different things.

That is why all you can do is paste the same quotes over and over again as if they have never been refuted before.

Hey, manchild:

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.

You lose again.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48663
May 26, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
As you eloquently show by running away from my direct quote of you arguing that the UK is a monarchy
I've never had to argue that the UK is a monarchy, SuperFAG.

The sun rises in the east, sets, in the west, United KING_dom is a monarchy, no matter how hard you stomp your fairy feet, and you will never admit you are wrong, even when you are quoted exactly saying two of the opposite things.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48664
May 26, 2013
 

Judged:

3

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
That is why all you can do is paste the same quotes over and over again as if they have never been refuted before.
Or that they cannot be refuted.

Like when you told us all there was only on citation on all the internet and I gave you four links.

Or when you insisted unanimous meant 'mostly' instead of... unanimously...

Wipe your chins, dear.

The UK is still a monarchy.
SupaAFC

Glenrothes, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48665
May 28, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never had to argue that the UK is a monarchy, SuperFAG.
The sun rises in the east, sets, in the west, United KING_dom is a monarchy, no matter how hard you stomp your fairy feet, and you will never admit you are wrong, even when you are quoted exactly saying two of the opposite things.
I forgot that manchildren do not have to argue anything because whatever they claim magically becomes fact no matter how much reality contradicts them. Sadly for you, this is not how adults debate.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Or that they cannot be refuted.

Like when you told us all there was only on citation on all the internet and I gave you four links.

Or when you insisted unanimous meant 'mostly' instead of... unanimously...

Wipe your chins, dear.

The UK is still a monarchy.
Your red herrings have been refuted already, manchild. Are you that desperate to keep this "debate" alive that all you can do is revel in past "glories" that had next-to-nothing to do with what my arguments really were?

Tell us again about how Britain cannot be a democracy based on nothing but your belief that things can only be defined by one word, and how to this day you still do not have the testicular fortitude to define democracy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48666
May 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
I forgot that manchildren do not have to argue anything because whatever they claim magically becomes fact no matter how much reality contradicts
Sounds like the Queen's Hour started early and ran late.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48667
May 28, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SupaAFC wrote:
Your red herrings have been refuted already, manchild.
I'm not the one posting the red herrings, Aunt Sally.

Ref: North Korea.
SupaAFC

Glenrothes, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48668
May 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like the Queen's Hour started early and ran late.
Sounds like manchild has no arguments.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not the one posting the red herrings, Aunt Sally.

Ref: North Korea.
Manchild logic: the name of the UK means it is a monarchy, but the name of North Korea does not make it a democratic republic.

Google "double standards". Read it.

Then stomp some more and pretend that you are not a hypocrite.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48669
May 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like manchild has no arguments.
There has never been an argument, SuperFAG.

The sun rises in the east, the United KING_dom is a monarchy, and no matter how hard you stomp, the Queen is the head of state.

Wipe your chins.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48670
May 29, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

SupaAFC wrote:
Manchild logic: the name of the UK means it is a monarchy, but the name of North Korea does not make it a democratic republic.
Never said it did, Aunt Sally.

Straw mans are your cup of tea, Shug.

That and inventing 'quotes'.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48671
May 30, 2013
 
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh, if you could only remember where you put it.
Is the United King_dom a monarchy? Yes or no?
Please re-read I HAVE documented fact, we are not concerned with your delusions here.

Are you still harping on about that old BS

Yes for the 167 thousandth time the United KINGDOM is a monarchy as has been explained to you on hundreds of occasions by several different posters who actually live in that monarchy, not some dim whited moron like you one who likes to offer his spite and hatred second hand.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••