In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,713

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Full Story
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48643 May 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not an analogy, SuperFAG.
Denial does not make refutations go away, manchild. You cannot refute simple rebuttals without shooting yourself in the foot and you fully well know this.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Having a monarch as a head of state makes the state a monarchy.
Does the United KING_dom have a monarch?
Nice try at changing the argument. You said nothing about the head of state; you simply asked if the "United KING_dom" is a monarchy or not because you think that the name of a country defines its government.

You run away from the DPR of Korea, and we all know why. Keep dancing, manchild. From the name of a country to its head of state to... what next? Its coinage? Its flag? Its capital city?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
English isn't your strong suite, eh?
Define analogy and show how the DPR-Korea comparison to the UK is not an analogy.

Oh, wait, manchild has nothing to back up his claims.

You were saying?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48644 May 24, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Denial does not make refutations go away, manchild.
~stomp stomp stomp~
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48645 May 24, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You said nothing about the head of state
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48646 May 24, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You run away from the DPR of Korea
Aunt Sally.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48647 May 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...
Once again trying to change your silly argument.

Manchild argues that because "Kingdom" is in the UK's name, the UK is a monarchy. By that same token North Korea is a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.

No wonder you are so desperate to jump onto something else. You got schooled, manchild.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48648 May 25, 2013
Manchild said:
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
United KING_dom.
Monarchy, yes or no?
Wipe your chin, flies....
Entire post; your words.

Show where "head of state" is mentioned.

Show where "Constitutional monarchy" is mentioned.

I quote you exactly and this is what we see: your lies.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#48649 May 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...
haha still trying to explain away your FAILURE to understand that a monarchy and a constitutional monarchy are two DIFFERENT and SEPARATE THINGS.

You can f*ck off back to your cult now god liar.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#48650 May 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...
You really are as dumb as your avatar looks.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48651 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again trying to change your silly argument.
Change it from what, Aunt Sally?

Is the United KING_dom a monarchy, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48652 May 25, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
You really are as dumb as your avatar looks.
And you are every bit as witty as your snappy comebacks indicate.

The ocean called, DICK...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48653 May 25, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
haha still trying to explain away your FAILURE to understand that a monarchy and a constitutional monarchy are two DIFFERENT...
Is a constitutional monarchy a monarchy?

Yes or no?

Put aside the UK has no written constitution...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48654 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Show where "head of state" is mentioned.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.
Wipe your chins, SuperFAG.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48655 May 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Change it from what, Aunt Sally?
Is the United KING_dom a monarchy, yes or no?
Playing dumb does not work with people who been "debating" with you for a good number of months. Are you that desperate that you are honestly trying to tell me that you cannot follow an exchange within the same page?

From arguing about the UK's name to its head of state to... well, what next? You are all over the place. You are quite literally spouting out whatever comes to mind irrespective of what you said a day or two ago.

And you know it, manchild, so stop playing dumb.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
SuperFAG writes:
Addressed and refuted. Got anything new?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48656 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Playing dumb does not work with people who been "debating" with you for a good number of months.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.
Is United KING_dom a monarchy? Yes or no?
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48657 May 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
++
SuperFAG writes:
<quoted text>
Addressed and refuted. Anything new?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is United KING_dom a monarchy? Yes or no?
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.

Manchild runs away.

What are you going to use now? The head of state? The currency? The flag? The borders? The culture? The cuisine? The landmarks? The capital city?

Dance some more, manchild.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48658 May 25, 2013
Hey, manchild, stop running away from when I quoted you exactly saying:
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
United KING_dom.
Monarchy, yes or no?
Wipe your chin, flies....
Show where "head of state" is mentioned.

Show where "Constitutional monarchy" is mentioned.

I quote you exactly and this is what we see: your lies.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48659 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Addressed and refuted. Anything new?
Kind of hard to refute direct quotes, SuperFAG.

NO one here expects you to admit you were wrong.
If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.
++

SuperFAG writes:
Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy. Or that it has "powers". Or that the monarch is our head of state.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48660 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.
Aunt Sally.

What is constitutional monarchy?

Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48661 May 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Show where "head of state" is mentioned..
What is constitutional monarchy?
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a king or queen acts as Head of State.
http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonar...

Wipe your chins, Aunt Sally.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#48662 May 26, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Kind of hard to refute direct quotes, SuperFAG.
As you eloquently show by running away from my direct quote of you arguing that the UK is a monarchy by virtue of having "King" in its name with no mention of Constitutional monarchy or the head of state.

You really need to look up something called "hypocrisy".
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
NO one here expects you to admit you were wrong.
<quoted text>
++
SuperFAG writes:
<quoted text>
No one here expects you to admit that having and being are completely different things.

That is why all you can do is paste the same quotes over and over again as if they have never been refuted before.

Hey, manchild:

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of Korea.

You lose again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 41 min NoahLovesU 235,556
The Consequences of Atheism 1 hr NoahLovesU 717
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 1 hr Eagle 12 4,758
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr paul porter 16,601
Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 5 hr Thinking 6,033
Is Religion Childish? 9 hr thetruth 136
Well that's religitards for you... 18 hr Thinking 1
More from around the web