In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,711

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Read more

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48098 Apr 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
**********
Form of government:
Constitutional monarchy, parliamentary democracy
**********
Is a parliamentary democracy a democracy?shrug!
Like I said... You are stupid.
A parliamentary system is a system
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

STEALING COPY FROM WIKIPEDIA and trying to pass it off as yours!

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

You are quite the wit!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48099 Apr 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
In your case the wheel is still spinning furiously but the hamster died long ago long ago.
HAHAHAAHAHAH!

Do you have an original thought?

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

What's next? Battle of wits with an unarmed man?

HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48100 Apr 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
Further replies will be ignored
OH NO! HOW WILL I make it through the DAY?

I shall cast myself off the nearest bridge!

HAHAHAAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48101 Apr 7, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
I have no time for idiots... they lower me to their level then beat me with experience.
WOW! I have never heard that one before!

Let me get my pencil

Here a website in case you need more cleches... yours are there by the way.

HAHAHAAHAHAH!

PS: there really is no bigger idiot than someone who plagiarizes from Wikipedia.

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

PPS: I'd bet SuperFAG $100 bucks that you will respond but he's ready britished out of a bet.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#48103 Apr 7, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
mon·ar·chy mon-er-kee]
noun, plural mon·ar·chies.
1. a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually ***** or nominally **** lodged in a monarch. Compare absolute monarchy, limited monarchy.
Do you know what the word "nominally" means, Meatball?
All POWER proceeds from the PEOPLE. This is the foundation of parliamentary DEMOCRACY in Sweden

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48104 Apr 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
All POWER proceeds from the PEOPLE. This is the foundation of parliamentary DEMOCRACY in Sweden
Having a KING is the foundation for proving Sweden is a monarchy.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#48105 Apr 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Having a KING is the foundation for proving Sweden is a monarchy.
You are so clueless

All POWER proceeds from the PEOPLE. This is the foundation of parliamentary DEMOCRACY in Sweden
Siro

Brisbane, Australia

#48107 Apr 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
All POWER proceeds from the PEOPLE. This is the foundation of parliamentary DEMOCRACY in Sweden
So how often do you get to elect the monarch?
.
Volvo called, they want you to return so they can crash test some more cars....if you ask nicely they might give you a helmet....JA!
SupaAFC

Inverness, UK

#48109 Apr 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor SuperFAG: thinks I have to answer his straw man arguments.
I don't.
Show us how a strawman is defined. Show us how the points and arguments are subsequently strawmen.

My prediction is that you will not bother because you either have no idea what strawmen are, or you are simply calling them strawmen to avoid actually addressing them.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Meanwhile: he stands with his tiny grapes exposed.
Is the UNITED KING_____dom a monarchy, yes or no?
Yes, it is.
Is the United States a republic, yes or no?

Yes, it is.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Does England have a state religion?
Why it certainly does.
Why should a poster who was born, raised and remains in Scotland care about English religious practices?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Does unanimous mean "most"?
No, SuperFAG, unanimous means everyone.
Where did I ever claim that it meant "most"?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the United States a republic? Gosh, SuperFAG: I posted this answer long before you asked it.
Certainly not by your own standard. I pose the same "yes or no" ultimatum to you and you cannot give one answer.

It is because, my manchild friend, you know that answering "yes" leads to the same fallacious answer that you are trying to get in regard to Britain being a monarchy.

Your intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy are so easy to exploit.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, by the way, SueprFAG, you just told us no one denies that the UK is a monarchy.
Here's a quote:
"If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.
She does not.
Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy. "
Who said that, SuperFAG?
Nice try. I specifically mentioned "system of government" so that you could not use this to claim that I deny that Britain has a monarchy.

Heed your own advice and read what people actually say instead of trying to take them out of context.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
PS: The type of government of the USA- or Canada, or North Korea, or Japan or China- has nothing to do with whether or not the UK is (as I said) is a monarchy.
Wipe your chin, honey, you have a few pearls running there...
The reason I bring up the United States and it being a republic is to simply demonstrate the blatant hypocrisy in your argument. It should be evident to you by now.

You keep claiming you have "already" answered the question but cannot show where you said "yes" or "no". The truth is you never have answered the question using such answers.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you going to redefine what "nobody" means now, SuperFAG?
You know, like when I called you on unanimous and you insisted it meant "most popular"?
Are you going to keep pretending that "system of government" is absent from the quote?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Monarchies can be democracies if the people elect the monarch.
There are no living elected monarchs.
Your king wasn't elected.
Easy to make up your own criteria that you know cannot be achieved to "win" the argument, isn't it?

How about showing us a definition for democracy instead of changing your rules to avoid refutations?
SupaAFC

Inverness, UK

#48110 Apr 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I play chess, you play checkers and not very well.
PS: take care of the pawns and the pawns take care of the king. literally, you don't play chess.
Like fundamentalists you seem to have a big problem understanding analogies.

The point, manchild, is that rather than try to actually win the match via checkmate - ie, try to refute my arguments - you place your entire focus away from the King and on a couple of pawns; words I have used, phrases, spelling, and so on. You then go full throttle into "refuting" these trivialities, declare victory, then keep posting these dead horses for weeks on end to try and distract me and other posters from noticing that, despite your bravado, you have not remotely tried refuting the arguments.

It is called over-compensating; something that you do on a worryingly regular basis.

Also:

"I didn't pick the name, Meatball"

"Now tell us the official name of Sweden"

You then claimed:

"PS: If you follow the thread, you will find I define Sweden because it is a monarchy, not because their official name is the KING_dom of Sweden."

So, Barefoot: if you do not define Sweden as a monarchy based on its name, then why did you go at pains to stress it's name within the same page of the thread?
Say the Truth

Eatontown, NJ

#48111 Apr 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
STEALING COPY FROM WIKIPEDIA and trying to pass it off as yours!
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
You are quite the wit!
What name did you post under before this one?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48112 Apr 8, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so clueless
Monarchy definition, a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.

English.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48113 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us how a strawman is defined.
Aunt Sally? Is that you?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48114 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
My prediction is that you will not bother because you either have no idea what strawmen are
Let's all watch how SuperFAG flips and flops:

SuperFAG writes: "Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy"

Poor SuperFAG. He forgot he already denied Britian had a monarchy.

Let's see..
SuperFAG writes...
"If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.
She does not.
Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy. "

+++

Now let's all watch as SuperFAG flips and flops and tries to say what he said exactly doesn't mean exactly what he said...

Popcorn, anyone?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48115 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Like fundamentalists you seem to have a big problem understanding analogies.
Let's all watch how SuperFAG flips and flops:

SuperFAG writes: "Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy"

Poor SuperFAG. He forgot he already denied Britian had a monarchy.

Let's see..
SuperFAG writes...
"If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.
She does not.
Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy. "

+++

Now let's all watch as SuperFAG flips and flops and tries to say what he said exactly doesn't mean exactly what he said...

Popcorn, anyone?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48116 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
My prediction is that you will not bother because
Because as I have told you the last fifty times you made the same "prediction", I don't have to prove something to you when you make the assertion.

What I get to do is quote EXACTLY what you say, and show EVERYONE where you said precisely the opposite, and then watch you flounder and flop and make up nonsense and exclaim that it depends what the definition of "is is".

HAHAHAAHAHAH!

Like when I quote you when you say 'unanimous' and then when I pull down your panties and prove you wrong you try to pretend you said "popular" or "almost everyone".

HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

Now, I catch you yet again.

Let's all watch how SuperFAG flips and flops:

SuperFAG writes: "Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy"

Poor SuperFAG. He forgot he already denied Britian had a monarchy.

Let's see..
SuperFAG writes...
"If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.
She does not.
Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy. "

+++

Now let's all watch as SuperFAG flips and flops and tries to say what he said exactly doesn't mean exactly what he said...

Popcorn, anyone?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48117 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
The point, manchild, is that rather than try to actually win the match via checkmate - ie, try to refute my arguments - you place your entire focus away from the King
You don't play chess, SuperFAG.

As anyone who gets past the three move checkmate will tell you, pawns are the most critical piece in setting up a good defense.

And you are on the other side of the board trying to figure out how to castle to the queen side.

PS:

Let's all watch how SuperFAG flips and flops:

SuperFAG writes: "Nobody, despite your continual spin, denies that Britain has a monarchy"

Poor SuperFAG. He forgot he already denied Britian had a monarchy.

Let's see..
SuperFAG writes...
"If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.
She does not.
Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy. "

+++

Now let's all watch as SuperFAG flips and flops and tries to say what he said exactly doesn't mean exactly what he said...

Popcorn, anyone?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48118 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Why should a poster who was born, raised and remains in Scotland care about English religious practices?
Scotland is still part of the UK.

I think that if anyone has small grapes than a Brit, it would be a Scot who has put up with having a Brit boss him around for three hundred years.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48119 Apr 8, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Are you going to keep pretending that "system of government" is absent from the quote?
HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

SYSTEM of government....

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

That is so much different thant....government.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAH!

""It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement..."

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#48120 Apr 8, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Monarchy definition, a state or nation in which the supreme power is actually or nominally lodged in a monarch.
English.
F A C T

All POWER proceeds from the PEOPLE. This is the foundation of parliamentary DEMOCRACY in Sweden

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 37 min Eagle 12 236,717
how the athiest created in the world ? 41 min Thinking 2
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 1 hr Ooogah Boogah 14,489
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 1 hr Thinking 1,873
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 1 hr Thinking 6,227
News 'Good without a god': Faces of atheism in Oklahoma (Jul '13) 3 hr Patrick n Angela 7,546
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr Patrick n Angela 17,896
More from around the web