In America, atheists are still in the closet

[Very Cynical Person]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't dish it out if you can't take it, you spooge-breathed puss.
How much longer are you going to be insisting you are giving me the 'silent treatment'?
Wipe your chin.

I never stated that I was giving you the silent treatment.

All though you should seek treatment for your condition.

It would seem by your responses that you cannot take it as you dish it out. I really do think that you have an unstable mental condition. Oh as I did state I do respond at times just to see you get all flustered and show your true color. From where I come from you would be a person of interest and suspicion by your comments. Many mentally unstable people have your affliction.

[barefoot2626]

Very Cynical Person wrote:

<quoted text>
I never stated that I was giving you the silent treatment.

Gosh, I wish you were.

I guess you were just waiting until you could say something clever... and gave up.

[barefoot2626]

Very Cynical Person wrote:

<
It would seem by your responses that you cannot take it as you dish it out.

I'm not the one rolling around on the floor sobbing his eyes out.

Want a hankie?

[Face Reality]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
Creationist piece of sh*t with no morals.

Does Obama claim to be a Christian who believes in "CREATION"?
Why does Obama lie?.
How about Clinton, Pelosi, Biden, and all the rest of those scripture quoting moral giants? lmao

[Face Reality]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not the one rolling around on the floor sobbing his eyes out.
Want a hankie?

A hankie would probably be best because I am sure he doesn't want your wet and nasty bib.

[barefoot2626]

Face Reality wrote:

<quoted text>
A hankie would probably be best because I am sure he doesn't want your wet and nasty bib.

Offer him yours, dear.

[no holds barred]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Want a hankie?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Offer him yours, dear.

Typical Liberal. Offer someone a hankie and then turn around and expect someone else to provide it.

[barefoot2626]

no holds barred wrote:

Typical Liberal.

Typical tea bagger: too embarrassed to pick one alias and stick with it.

[no holds barred]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical tea bagger: too embarrassed to pick one alias and stick with it.

lmao oh typical tea baggers are chasing you all over Topix with multiple ID's LMAO
Is that just one of them with multiple ID's or is it all of them with multiple ID's? roflmao

[barefoot2626]

no holds barred wrote:

<quoted text>
lmao oh typical tea baggers are chasing you all over Topix

You can excuse me for ignoring you, honey.

[no holds barred]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You can excuse me for ignoring you, honey.

lmao
NEXT
Woof

[no holds barred]

barefoot2626 ran out of insults? lmao

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
SupaAFC wrote:
Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.

So says the hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was Encyclopedia Britannica. Need I provide you that quote again?

[SupaAFC]

Very Cynical Person wrote:

<quoted text>It’s ok he has problems.

Autism gets my bet. It would explain his lack of social skills and why he gets an argument out of everybody - atheists, theists, liberals, conservatives, you name it.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
So says the hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was Encyclopedia Britannica.

SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.

[barefoot2626]

barefoot2626 wrote:

"Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957"
++
On this day in 1957 Sir Anthony Eden resigned as prime minister of Britain due to ill health, after just one year and 279 days in the post. He was succeeded by Harold Macmillan.
Eden resigned on 9 January 1957, after his doctors warned him his life was at stake if he continued in office. Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957. Shortly afterwards Eden and his wife left England for a holiday in New Zealand.
Eden retained much of his personal popularity in Britain, was created Earl of Avon in 1961, and entered the House of Lords. In retirement Eden was particularly bitter that during the Suez Crisis Eisenhower had initially indicated British and French troops should be allowed to remain around Port Said, only for the US ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. to press for an immediate withdrawal at the UN, thereby rendering the operation a complete failure. Eden felt the Eisenhower administration's unexpected opposition was hypocritical in light of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état and the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état.
http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...
++
Eden resigned on 9 January 1957, after his doctors warned him his life was at stake if he continued in office.[43] Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957.[44] Shortly afterwards Eden and his wife left England for a holiday in New Zealand. HP Pavilion DV4-1248TX Battery
http://battery-2010.blogspot.com/2012/01/anth...
+++
http://www.ukdebate.co.uk/forums/index.php...
ranger121
Bassist
"Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957"
++++++
This is your claim, by the way.
As I pointed out to you already, the little number at the end means WIKI took the source from another site.
Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957.[50]

I give you the LINKS to sources you said didn't exist.

Including this one:

http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...

Now SUPERFAG: all I had to show you was ONE source.

Can you count to ONE, SuperAG? It 's the number of of men who had a happy ending in your mouth since I posted this note.

Wipe your chin.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
Autism gets my bet.

No one will take your bet, SuperFAG:

you don't pay off when you lose.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"
PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.[/QUOTE

So says the manchild hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was the Encyclopedia Britannica.

You refuse to acknowledge this - and we all know why.

[QUOTE who="barefoot2626"] <quoted text>
I give you the LINKS to sources you said didn't exist.

Yet you still refuse to declare where you got the quote from.

Conclusion: manchild got it from Wikipedia, contradicted himself, so ran away with a red herring.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Including this one:
http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...

That would be the exact link you claimed was the Encyclopedia Britannica.

One of the admins I asked said it is not.

So.

Were you wrong? Did you lie? Yes or no? True or false? Oui or non?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Now SUPERFAG: all I had to show you was ONE source.

To refute your strawman. To actually answer what you were asked means showing where you actually got the quote from.

Be a big boy and stop hiding behind red herring-turned strawmans.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Can you count to ONE, SuperAG? It 's the number of of men who had a happy ending in your mouth since I posted this note.
Wipe your chin.

Can you answer questions instead of refuting strawmen?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
No one will take your bet, SuperFAG:
you don't pay off when you lose.

The "bet" exists only in your head, my strawman-creating manchild friend.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Your word is WORTHLESS.
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!
F*king welsher!

Is that why you refuse to play by your own playbook and explain to everybody why you were wrong about your Facebook link being the Encyclopedia Britannica?

Was the admin lying? Were you wrong? Can you tell us where you got the quote from?

Perhaps it would be a good idea to practice what you preach before talking about other posters' words being meaningless. But that would require being an adult.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet you still refuse to declare where you got the quote from.

don't have to, whiny spooge breathed- mama's boy.

You lost a bet and now you want change the rules.

HAHHAAHAHAHAH!

WELSHER!

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Conclusion: manchild got it from Wikipedia

you don't pay off when you lose.

I'm not responsible for your conclusions, Pusspuss.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!