In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,713

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Full Story

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47567 Feb 24, 2013
Face Reality wrote:
<quoted text>
A hankie would probably be best because I am sure he doesn't want your wet and nasty bib.
Offer him yours, dear.
no holds barred

Rochelle, IL

#47568 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Want a hankie?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Offer him yours, dear.
Typical Liberal. Offer someone a hankie and then turn around and expect someone else to provide it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47569 Feb 24, 2013
no holds barred wrote:
Typical Liberal.
Typical tea bagger: too embarrassed to pick one alias and stick with it.
no holds barred

Rochelle, IL

#47570 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical tea bagger: too embarrassed to pick one alias and stick with it.
lmao oh typical tea baggers are chasing you all over Topix with multiple ID's LMAO
Is that just one of them with multiple ID's or is it all of them with multiple ID's? roflmao

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47571 Feb 24, 2013
no holds barred wrote:
<quoted text>
lmao oh typical tea baggers are chasing you all over Topix
You can excuse me for ignoring you, honey.
no holds barred

Rochelle, IL

#47572 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can excuse me for ignoring you, honey.
lmao
NEXT
Woof
no holds barred

Rochelle, IL

#47573 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 ran out of insults? lmao
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47574 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
SupaAFC wrote:
Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.
So says the hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was Encyclopedia Britannica. Need I provide you that quote again?
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47575 Feb 24, 2013
Very Cynical Person wrote:
<quoted text>It’s ok he has problems.
Autism gets my bet. It would explain his lack of social skills and why he gets an argument out of everybody - atheists, theists, liberals, conservatives, you name it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47576 Feb 24, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
So says the hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was Encyclopedia Britannica.
SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47577 Feb 24, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
"Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957"
++
On this day in 1957 Sir Anthony Eden resigned as prime minister of Britain due to ill health, after just one year and 279 days in the post. He was succeeded by Harold Macmillan.
Eden resigned on 9 January 1957, after his doctors warned him his life was at stake if he continued in office. Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957. Shortly afterwards Eden and his wife left England for a holiday in New Zealand.
Eden retained much of his personal popularity in Britain, was created Earl of Avon in 1961, and entered the House of Lords. In retirement Eden was particularly bitter that during the Suez Crisis Eisenhower had initially indicated British and French troops should be allowed to remain around Port Said, only for the US ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. to press for an immediate withdrawal at the UN, thereby rendering the operation a complete failure. Eden felt the Eisenhower administration's unexpected opposition was hypocritical in light of the 1953 Iranian coup d'état and the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état.
http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...
++
Eden resigned on 9 January 1957, after his doctors warned him his life was at stake if he continued in office.[43] Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957.[44] Shortly afterwards Eden and his wife left England for a holiday in New Zealand. HP Pavilion DV4-1248TX Battery
http://battery-2010.blogspot.com/2012/01/anth...
+++
http://www.ukdebate.co.uk/forums/index.php...
ranger121
Bassist
"Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957"
++++++
This is your claim, by the way.
As I pointed out to you already, the little number at the end means WIKI took the source from another site.
Although the media expected Butler would get the nod, a survey of the Cabinet done for the Queen showed Macmillan was the nearly unanimous choice, and he became Prime Minister on 10 January 1957.[50]
I give you the LINKS to sources you said didn't exist.

Including this one:

http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...

Now SUPERFAG: all I had to show you was ONE source.

Can you count to ONE, SuperAG? It 's the number of of men who had a happy ending in your mouth since I posted this note.

Wipe your chin.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47578 Feb 24, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Autism gets my bet.
No one will take your bet, SuperFAG:

you don't pay off when you lose.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!
SupaAFC

UK

#47579 Feb 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"
PS, SUperFAG: there is not a single person here that expected to keep your word.[/QUOTE

So says the manchild hypocrite who claimed his Facebook link was the Encyclopedia Britannica.

You refuse to acknowledge this - and we all know why.

[QUOTE who="barefoot2626"] <quoted text>
I give you the LINKS to sources you said didn't exist.
Yet you still refuse to declare where you got the quote from.

Conclusion: manchild got it from Wikipedia, contradicted himself, so ran away with a red herring.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Including this one:
http://www.facebook.com/BritannicaHistorica/p...
That would be the exact link you claimed was the Encyclopedia Britannica.

One of the admins I asked said it is not.

So.

Were you wrong? Did you lie? Yes or no? True or false? Oui or non?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now SUPERFAG: all I had to show you was ONE source.
To refute your strawman. To actually answer what you were asked means showing where you actually got the quote from.

Be a big boy and stop hiding behind red herring-turned strawmans.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you count to ONE, SuperAG? It 's the number of of men who had a happy ending in your mouth since I posted this note.
Wipe your chin.
Can you answer questions instead of refuting strawmen?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
No one will take your bet, SuperFAG:
you don't pay off when you lose.
The "bet" exists only in your head, my strawman-creating manchild friend.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your word is WORTHLESS.
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!
F*king welsher!
Is that why you refuse to play by your own playbook and explain to everybody why you were wrong about your Facebook link being the Encyclopedia Britannica?

Was the admin lying? Were you wrong? Can you tell us where you got the quote from?

Perhaps it would be a good idea to practice what you preach before talking about other posters' words being meaningless. But that would require being an adult.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47580 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet you still refuse to declare where you got the quote from.
don't have to, whiny spooge breathed- mama's boy.

You lost a bet and now you want change the rules.

HAHHAAHAHAHAH!

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47581 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Conclusion: manchild got it from Wikipedia
you don't pay off when you lose.

I'm not responsible for your conclusions, Pusspuss.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47582 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
That would be the exact link you claimed was the Encyclopedia Britannica..
you don't pay off when you lose.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47583 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
To refute your strawman. To actually answer what you were asked .
you don't pay off when you lose.

YOU *INSISTED* the only place I could have possibly gotten it was Wikipedia.

Your word is WORTHLESS.

Like you, you worthless snaggly-tooth bucket of drool.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!

F*king welsher!
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47585 Feb 25, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
don't have to, whiny spooge breathed- mama's boy.
Then you lied when you claimed you got it from another source.

Manchild got caught with the cookie jar again.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You lost a bet and now you want change the rules.
HAHHAAHAHAHAH!
WELSHER!
Anybody can scroll back a few pages of this thread and see that every time you tried to issue this challenge I never took you up on it. It is simply sad that you are outright pretending that I agreed to a bet.

Perhaps you can show where I ever agreed to a bet since you seem intent on claiming that I did.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
you don't pay off when you lose.
I do not make bets. You are more than welcome to prove me wrong and show me where I ever have, though.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU *INSISTED* the only place I could have possibly gotten it was Wikipedia.
Since it was the only source that came up on a Google search. I have no problem admitting that other sources exist that I was unaware of.

Your refusal to say where you got the quote from, so persistence to play with this red herring, says more about your empty arguments than it does about my web browsing.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Your word is WORTHLESS.
Then why do you ignore my arguments and pounce on red herrings?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47586 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you lied
SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

I like the way you emphasized ONLY.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47587 Feb 25, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<
Anybody can scroll back a few pages of this thread and see that every time you tried to issue this challenge
SupaAFC wrote:
"Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

I like the way you emphasized ONLY.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 38 min Joe fortuna 235,541
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 49 min Eagle 12 4,716
Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 3 hr Thinking 6,030
"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr Mugwump 16,523
The Consequences of Atheism 4 hr polymath257 686
Is Religion Childish? 4 hr Thinking 125
.com | Why is Atheism on the Rise - Final Response 12 hr QUITTNER Feb 26 2015 2
More from around the web