In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,724

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Full Story

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47238 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Not remotely.
YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47239 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
When copy-pasted into Google Wikipedia was the only source
******LIE**********

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47240 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Even so,
EVEN SO?

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

So now you find them!

LIAR!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47241 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
And until you actually tell me where you got the quote
~stomp stomp stomp~

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47242 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
If Wikipedia's article did not exist then
LIE!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

THE WIKIPEDIA SOURCE IS EVEN FOOTNOTE!!

HUMP! M/F C/S lying troll HUMP!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47243 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Unless you actually have the book itself and manually typed out the quote
YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47245 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Even so, you are -still- to declare which link
I have to declare NOTHING!

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

Did you say this?

WELSHER!
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47247 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean: you have no way of proving.
Especially since it isn't true.
And I have proven a long list, you whiny b*, you are a troll.
The sun comes up in the east...
I mean: you keep changing your demands every time you are refuted.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
Once again, you are running with a strawman to ignore the original question which was where you got the quote from.

You got it from Wikipedia, my manchild friend. You can pounce on a mistake I made considering Wiki is the only source that pops up when the quote is pasted into Google, but then, that is the way you play.

Jump onto anything, now matter how pedantic, to avoid the argument itself.

Let me play by your game:

Is your Facebook link really EB? Yes or no?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
******LIE**********

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
If that were a lie then your other links would pop up in a Google search.

They do not.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>EVEN SO?

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

So now you find them!

LIAR!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
Even so indeed. You are going on another nitpicking mission to avoid the fact that you have still, despite countless requested, refused to disclose where you got the quote from.

That is because, my manchild friend, you got it from Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>

LIE!
Really? Then how do you explain the fact that all your links are carbon copies of Wikipedia's Eden article?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
THE WIKIPEDIA SOURCE IS EVEN FOOTNOTE!!
A text which you certainly do not possess or ever read. That is why you got the quote online from Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HUMP! M/F C/S lying troll HUMP!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Are you drunk?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>I have to declare NOTHING!
Except where you got the quote from.

Except how you define democracy.

Except that your Facebook link was not EB.

Except that you contradict your own logic if need be.

Except that you think things within an umbrella term are the same.

Except that you think things can only be defined by one word.

Except that you removed the words "kind of" from Constitutional monarchy despite using them to describe other forms of monarchy.

Except that you cannot accept that Royal Assent has not been refused in over 300 years.

Keep adding to the list my manchild friend - I need plenty of mallet fodder.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47248 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
I mean: you keep changing your demands every time you are refuted.
I have to declare NOTHING!

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Did you say this?

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

Did you say this?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47249 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Once again, you are running with a strawman I need plenty of mallet fodder.
Did you say this?

TROLL!

HAHAHAHAAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47250 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You can pounce on a mistake I made considering Wiki is the only source that pops up
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47251 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You got it from Wikipedia
OBVIOUS NOT!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

W E L S H E R !

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47252 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Let me play by your game:
Is your Facebook link really EB? Yes or no?
DID YOU SAY THIS?

YES OR NO!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

W E L S H E R !

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47253 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Except how you define democracy.
WELSHER!

WORTHLESS M/F CS liar!

HAHAHAHAHA!

HOW BRITISH OF YOU!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

W E L S H E R !
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47254 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have to declare NOTHING!
Except where you got the quote from.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Did you say this?
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
TRUE OR FALSE?
Did you say this?
WELSHER!
Did you say where you got the quote from which was the original question prior to your tangeant? Yes or no?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
WELSHER!
WORTHLESS M/F CS liar!
HAHAHAHAHA!
HOW BRITISH OF YOU!
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
W E L S H E R !
Seriously: are you drunk?

If we are going to play pedantic instead of actually look at the substance of the arguments:

Did you say where you got the quote from? Yes or no?

Did you say that your non EB Facebook page was EBs? Yes or no?

Did you ignore EB's actual biography of Eden? Yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47255 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Except where you got the quote from.
I GOT this QUOTE form you!!!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

And now you say it exists in four other places that you couldn't find!

HAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

Did you say it?

HAHAHAHAAHAH!

HAHAHAHAHA!

HOW BRITISH OF YOU!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47256 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Seriously: are you drunk?
Seriously: how do you look at yourself in the morning without punching your own face in, you m/f c/s worthless D/s LIAR!

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

What else do I have to prove?

The moon landing wasn't shot in a movie studio?

YOUR QUOTE:
Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47257 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Did you say where you got the quote
doesn't matter.

Here's what matters:

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

I've DISPROVED this, LIAR!
Siro

Sydney, Australia

#47258 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
I see that you have no qualms with ignoring Christian doctrine to satisfy your own prejudices.
Seeing as I am not a christian why should I be bound by it seeing as you are bound by nothing such as a concept of right or wrong or any type of rational thought or judgment.
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
When calling atheists stupid, make sure to re-check which side believes in magic.
That would be -your- side.
Any yet you cannot explain phenomena attributed to magic/occult acts but simply say they are 'delusion' or 'mental illness'.

Name one mental illness that has been cured?
You maltheists go on about psychiatry/psychology and 'rational thought' and scientific 'progress' and all you do is dope up people enough so they dont ask any questions because that would be embarrassing for your ilk.
After all, how would you be infallible if you cant use your 'rational thought' to answer questions with absolutely true answers?
Of course you can stick to the 'I wont answer that because it is completely beneath me and not worthy of being dignified' M.O. of your god dawkins.

There may be only a few of us believers on this site, but gee dont we rub your collective faces in it?

BTW - How long to you plan to embarrass yourself here? Its getting repetitive and boring......

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#47259 Feb 13, 2013
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
Seeing as I am not a christian why should I be bound by it seeing as you are bound by nothing such as a concept of right or wrong or any type of rational thought or judgment.
<quoted text>
Any yet you cannot explain phenomena attributed to magic/occult acts but simply say they are 'delusion' or 'mental illness'.
Name one mental illness that has been cured?
You maltheists go on about psychiatry/psychology and 'rational thought' and scientific 'progress' and all you do is dope up people enough so they dont ask any questions because that would be embarrassing for your ilk.
After all, how would you be infallible if you cant use your 'rational thought' to answer questions with absolutely true answers?
Of course you can stick to the 'I wont answer that because it is completely beneath me and not worthy of being dignified' M.O. of your god dawkins.
There may be only a few of us believers on this site, but gee dont we rub your collective faces in it?
BTW - How long to you plan to embarrass yourself here? Its getting repetitive and boring......
Which part of the sentence "Prove your f*cking god you lying sack of creationist sh*t" did you fail to understand?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 4 hr Eagle 12 2,407
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 5 hr Joe fortuna 232,877
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 10 hr _Bad Company 23,198
Islam is the Enemy (Sep '12) 14 hr Pahu 33
God' existence 14 hr Carchar king 63
A New Kinder, Gentler Atheism 14 hr Carchar king 138
Yes, atheists can be fundamentalists 21 hr Crazy Mess 1
More from around the web