In America, atheists are still in the closet

Apr 11, 2012 Full story: Spiked 47,711

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Read more

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47231 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
I pointed out that you did not come across the statement from the original source.
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47232 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
I do not know how you found them, but
BUT I FOUND THEM BEFORE YOU EVEN LOOKED!

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
Siro

Australia

#47233 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You notice that?
Even when you prove the NotBot to be wrong - or to be a liar... again... here's their excuse: you are using 'semantics'...
And yet they use marxist dialectic to redefine whatever rants they post to suit their supposed point of the time, even though they might produce contradicting/opposing points of view in their argument. They will still hold these points as being simultaneously absolutely true.
They are easily to predict because they all are schooled in atheist or so-called 'rational' thought in the same way.
It is them that are indoctrinated in a cult like process - not us.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47234 Feb 12, 2013
Siro wrote:
I see the maltheists are resorting to their usual M.O. in trying to bore barefoot2626 off topix with the usual spamming of rehashed and redefined rants and diatribes as well as irrelevant posts.
I see that you have no qualms with ignoring Christian doctrine to satisfy your own prejudices.
Siro wrote:
Unfortunately barefoot you must realise now if you havent already and as I was once told....
"you will never win an argument with a stupid person"
How true that is, we believers see it everyday with the maltheist perverts on this site
When calling atheists stupid, make sure to re-check which side believes in magic.

That would be -your- side.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47235 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it.
Why? You are never satisfied with your demands and when completely cornered - politics degree springs to mind - you simply up sticks and move on to something else.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Putting aside I have already
a) Proved that the Wiki entry is a compilation of posts
Not remotely. You have simply linked me to other sites that copy-paste Wikipedia's own work.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text> including my source
Was an internet link, most likely Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
b) did you already forget to told us there were no other sources that I could have possible gotten my quote from?
When copy-pasted into Google Wikipedia was the only source that came up.

Even so, you are -still- to declare which link you got it from, so until you do, there is nothing for me to acknowledge. You are still running away from saying where you got it from - and it was certainly not the source Wiki cited.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you still posting?
Welsher!
Because you serve as an excellent time-killing whackamole.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
PS: I GAVE YOU THE LINKSA, Welsher!
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Here's a thought, dumbpqhuq: I didn't go looking for the quote, I already had the quote.
I didn't know or care that it was ALSO in Wikipedia, ya dumbphuq.
Why are you still posting, Welsher?
How about answering the question which was where you got the quote from?

Was it from Wiki?

Your non-EB Facebook page?

A blog?

An internet debate forum?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean by taking EXACTLY what YOU said and proving you to be a liar?
How could I be lying when I was unaware of those links, all of which copied from Wikipedia anyway?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You notice that?
Even when you prove the NotBot to be wrong - or to be a liar... again... here's their excuse: you are using 'semantics'...
And semantics it is. Notice how you are -still- to tell me where you got the quote from which was what I was asking in the first place.

Pounces on words, avoids the argument.
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47236 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do remember insisting that the ONLY place I could have possibly gotten it from was Wikipedia?
And I gave you FOUR more web sources with the link...
And you still insist that it isn't possible that I got this quote from any other place except Wikipedia?
WELSHER!
If Wikipedia's article did not exist then neither would your three links considering - drum roll - they copied from Wikipedia.

Still to tell me where you got the quote from. I am sticking with Wikipedia until you be a big boy and actually answer the question.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I told you weeks ago I didn't use Wikipedia as the source for the quote and you insisted I did.
And until you actually tell me where you got the quote from I am sticking with Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And I already PROVED Wiki wasn't the original source.
Which was never the point. Unless you actually have the book itself and manually typed out the quote - which would be amazing considering Wikipedia did not use inverted commas to directly quote from the source - you evidently got quote from one of those links you posted.

You are still to declare where you actually got the quote from. It was certainly not the source Wiki attributed it to.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
TRUE OR FALSE?
Barefoot has still not declared where he got the quote from. True or false?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
BUT I FOUND THEM BEFORE YOU EVEN LOOKED!
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Then kindly declare where you got the quote from.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
TRUE OR FALSE?
WELSHER!
Barefoot has -still- not said where he got the quote from. True or false?

Also: are you still going to pretend your Facebook page was EB? Was that a lie?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47237 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Why? You are never satisfied with your demands
You mean: you have no way of proving.

Especially since it isn't true.

And I have proven a long list, you whiny b*, you are a troll.

The sun comes up in the east...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47238 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Not remotely.
YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47239 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
When copy-pasted into Google Wikipedia was the only source
******LIE**********

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47240 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Even so,
EVEN SO?

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

So now you find them!

LIAR!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47241 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
And until you actually tell me where you got the quote
~stomp stomp stomp~

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47242 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
If Wikipedia's article did not exist then
LIE!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

THE WIKIPEDIA SOURCE IS EVEN FOOTNOTE!!

HUMP! M/F C/S lying troll HUMP!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47243 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Unless you actually have the book itself and manually typed out the quote
YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47245 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Even so, you are -still- to declare which link
I have to declare NOTHING!

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

Did you say this?

WELSHER!
SupaAFC

Glasgow, UK

#47247 Feb 12, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean: you have no way of proving.
Especially since it isn't true.
And I have proven a long list, you whiny b*, you are a troll.
The sun comes up in the east...
I mean: you keep changing your demands every time you are refuted.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
Once again, you are running with a strawman to ignore the original question which was where you got the quote from.

You got it from Wikipedia, my manchild friend. You can pounce on a mistake I made considering Wiki is the only source that pops up when the quote is pasted into Google, but then, that is the way you play.

Jump onto anything, now matter how pedantic, to avoid the argument itself.

Let me play by your game:

Is your Facebook link really EB? Yes or no?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
******LIE**********

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
If that were a lie then your other links would pop up in a Google search.

They do not.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>EVEN SO?

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

So now you find them!

LIAR!

YOUR QUOTE: "Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim"

TRUE OR FALSE?

WELSHER!
Even so indeed. You are going on another nitpicking mission to avoid the fact that you have still, despite countless requested, refused to disclose where you got the quote from.

That is because, my manchild friend, you got it from Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>

LIE!
Really? Then how do you explain the fact that all your links are carbon copies of Wikipedia's Eden article?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
THE WIKIPEDIA SOURCE IS EVEN FOOTNOTE!!
A text which you certainly do not possess or ever read. That is why you got the quote online from Wikipedia.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HUMP! M/F C/S lying troll HUMP!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH!
Are you drunk?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>I have to declare NOTHING!
Except where you got the quote from.

Except how you define democracy.

Except that your Facebook link was not EB.

Except that you contradict your own logic if need be.

Except that you think things within an umbrella term are the same.

Except that you think things can only be defined by one word.

Except that you removed the words "kind of" from Constitutional monarchy despite using them to describe other forms of monarchy.

Except that you cannot accept that Royal Assent has not been refused in over 300 years.

Keep adding to the list my manchild friend - I need plenty of mallet fodder.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47248 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
I mean: you keep changing your demands every time you are refuted.
I have to declare NOTHING!

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Did you say this?

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

TRUE OR FALSE?

Did you say this?

WELSHER!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47249 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Once again, you are running with a strawman I need plenty of mallet fodder.
Did you say this?

TROLL!

HAHAHAHAAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47250 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You can pounce on a mistake I made considering Wiki is the only source that pops up
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47251 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You got it from Wikipedia
OBVIOUS NOT!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

W E L S H E R !

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#47252 Feb 12, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Let me play by your game:
Is your Facebook link really EB? Yes or no?
DID YOU SAY THIS?

YES OR NO!

QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim

W E L S H E R !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 4 min MikeF 17,978
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 29 min Thinking 6,421
News The Consequences of Atheism 52 min Thinking 1,120
News Who is an atheist? (May '10) 1 hr Freebird USA 9,246
News Confessions of a black atheist 2 hr Savant 15
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr polymath257 236,860
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 14 hr DebraE 14,498
More from around the web