In America, atheists are still in the closet

[barefoot2626]

Mikko wrote:

<quoted text>
stop lying!
Kingdoms can be democracies (no lies from you changes that)

Nope.

PS: I see you ran away from the fact that Swedes are paying a big chunk of that wedding.

If Sweden was a democracy: it would be paying a big chunk of everyone's wedding.

[barefoot2626]

Mikko wrote:

next wedding will be paid

GOSH... meatball!

"will be paid?"

You just called me a liar when I told you that Swedes pair for a big chunk foR it.

SO: AGAIN... I'm right... you're wrong

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Is Britain a Constitutional monarchy, yes or no?

Oh, Sweetie: a constitutional monarchy is a kind of monarchy.

Where is that dictionary when you need it?

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Another lie. I have never denied that Britain has a monarchy, I state that Britain is a Parliamentary democracy with a figurehead monarch at the top.

QUOTED:

SupaAFC
#46271
Tuesday Jan 15



If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Proof?
You have asserted that I have never cited my sources.
I have offered to provide proof for which you will stop posting.
Buck buck buck.buckALLLLLLL!

And I will tell you for the second/third time that I do not compromise with manchildren. You eat your peas like a good boy instead of expecting to get rewarded for it.

Now that you have finally learned to cite sources (ie, university websites), perhaps you can now show me where you got the Macmillan quote from like an adult. Even if you choose not to, all that will accomplish is a public display of the dishonest lengths you go to keep a lie going.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>still no link...

Waiting... I prove cite, you stop posting.

The links have been posted. You have set up a strawman and attacked the courses within the degrees.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>sun comes up in the east...

And students pass courses to obtain their degrees.

Penny sunk yet?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Note how m any times I have to point out that you need to paraphrase what I have said rather than provide the quote.

The quotes can be located above each of my own statements. Translations allows everyday posters to see through your gibberish and see what your illogical nonsense means in reality.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
PS: note the QUOTE of you insisting Britain not a monarchy.

Britain's system of government. For you to prove me wrong would require showing the Queen making laws herself.

Good luck.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
PPS: still no link... putting aside...

Links proved; strawman you made.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Waiting... I prove cite, you stop posting.

I do not negotiate with manchildren. Either back up your claim or keep showing the world your compulsive dishonesty.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Explain why this is a "grammatical" error... instead of just flat out wrong?

Explain why you cannot address the argument?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>You insist on foisting your illogical thoughts on others.
I am not responsible for any of your creative fictions.

Those inconvenient literary devices that "foist" those "illogical thoughts" are better known as analogies.

Ana-log-ies.

Do my analogies appear illogical? Excellent - they should considering they mirror -your- illogical arguments!

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
The entire world of computers revolves around boolean logic: is or is not, 0 or 1, yes or no.

Only that humans are not machines - whoops.

Social science, including politics, does not rely on asking machines for simple yes-no answers; such answers are vague, simplistic and do not explain the details within social phenomena.

This is why your logic fails. It explains ultimately nothing.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
The follow is an example: the United Kingdom is a monarchy.

And an excellent example at that. Submit this in a political science paper and it would be laughed out of the department.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Also already refuted.

Really? Excellent - show me the source you got the quote from then.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, Sweetie: a constitutional monarchy is a kind of monarchy.
Where is that dictionary when you need it?

It is also a "kind" of democracy considering that a Constitutional monarchy limits the powers of the monarch and transfers them to other bodies such as Parliaments.

That is why, you know, Britain is called a Constitutional monarchy - not just a blanket "monarchy" that you desperately wish it is.

[Mikko]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
GOSH... meatball!
"will be paid?"
You just called me a liar when I told you that Swedes pair for a big chunk foR it.
SO: AGAIN... I'm right... you're wrong

i called you a liar when you lied that sweden isn't a democracy douche!

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
And I will tell you for the second/third time

You run your mouth and I slap the snot out of your.

RUN AWAY LITTLE BOY!

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Now that you have finally learned to cite sources

Happy to prove CITE over a month ago.

Also a year ago.

Or two years ago.

RUN AWAY little BOY!

[Mikko]

USA is a republic not a democracy

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Now that you have finally learned to cite sources

Call it a year and 11 months ago.

Happy to cite source in this thread, a month ago, buck up, little boy.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Britain's system of government.

Britain's system of government is a monarchy.

How do you look yourself in the mirror with punching yourself?

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

For you to prove me wrong would require showing the Queen making laws herself.

Troll.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

The links have been posted.

Troll

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

It is also a "kind" of democrac

Troll

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

That is why, you know, Britain is called a Constitutional monarchy

Troll.

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You run your mouth and I slap the snot out of your.
RUN AWAY LITTLE BOY!

I would certainly run away from you if I were in the same physical place due to your blatant mental instability, but not on this forum when you are so easy, and fun, to refute.

So, when are you going to show me the source for your Macmillan quote? In your own time.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Happy to prove CITE over a month ago.
Also a year ago.
Or two years ago.
RUN AWAY little BOY!

How about within the last week when you claimed you got your Macmillan quote from a source outside Wikipedia? That would be ever so kind of you.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Call it a year and 11 months ago.

Happy to cite source in this thread, a month ago, buck up, little boy.

Unless your Macmillan source was from this thread citing anything from here will not dig you out of your hole.

You claimed you got it from a source other than Wikipedia. Well then, let's see it. Put up, manchild.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Britain's system of government is a monarchy.

How do you look yourself in the mirror with punching yourself?

Then show the Queen making laws and attending world leaders conferences. Good luck!

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Troll.

Does manchild need his nap-nap? Go have some happy dreams then come back when you feel better; don't worry, my mallet is waiting right here for you.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Then show the Queen making laws

head of state, troll.

[barefoot2626]

[QUOTE who="SupaAFC"
Unless your Macmillan source
[/QUOTE]

already posted, troll

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
head of state, troll.

fig·ure·head [fig-yer-hed] Show IPA
noun
1.
a person who is head of a group, company, etc., in title but actually has no real authority or responsibility: Most modern kings and queens are figureheads.

Try again.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
already posted, troll

Where? Like your maturity it appears to be non-existant.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
fig·ure·head [fig-yer-hed]

QUOTED:

SupaAFC
#46271
Tuesday Jan 15

If Britain is a monarchy then the Queen should have legislative powers.

She does not.

Thus, Britain's system of government is not a monarchy.