In America, atheists are still in the closet

[barefoot2626]

Darwins Stepchild wrote:

It was you that claimed the Constitution is based on Biblical principles.

Still waiting for the quote on this, as well.

NotBots: if you can't find the quote you need, make one up.

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

The UK is a constitutional monarchy. How quickly you forget when you can't remember losing an argument....

That would make the UK a monarchy.

Let me guess: you have two degrees in an a credited university in English?

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

I'm sorry your god isn't real.

Why don't you show everyone here my God.

Start with a quote.

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Yet by your stupid logic of having to look at only the umbrella term

Umbrella term?

You minored in English in addition to your two degrees in BS, eh?

[01Justsayin]

Not from where I stand. Atheists make their views known as much as everybody else. In fact, they are often more aggressive about what they DON'T believe in than most other people are about everything they DO believe in.

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I go as far as I need to go, SuperFAG.

That would be as far as the coat-tails of my posts.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>You are a liar, SuperFAG.

But we knew that already.

Why not start with you explaining what I mean to say with another SuperFAG paraphrase?

If I am lying then I would not be responding to your posts word for word, line for line, post for post.

But, I am.

Why are you lying?

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Again: where oh where is the quote?

Do you think that guilt is proven only by the words of the accused? You have dropped your demands like a hot potato as soon as I provided you with the links you asked for without even acknowledging as such. That, alone, demonstrates that you were flat out wrong regarding universities not handing out degrees in politics.

If your new game is "you need to have a quote to prove it!", then there are a lot of criminals out there needing released tomorrow morning.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Still waiting.

Either:

1) You did not read my posts complete with links;

2) You ignored the links;

3) You read the links, ignored the content, and are pretending as such.

Which is it? Because I am not going on a wild goose chase when you are not going to play ball.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Umbrella term?

You minored in English in addition to your two degrees in BS, eh?

Yes, umbrella term. I am sorry for over-estimating your intellectual capabilities, but just because manchild has not heard of certain terms and phrases does not mean that those terms and phrases do not exist.

In Barefootland, there are no dogs, cats, horses, lions - only mammals.

In Barefootland, there are no Germans, Americans, Italians, Frenchmen - only nationalities.

In Barefootland, there is no romance, thriller, action, horror, comedy - only genres.

Manchild logic, manchild rules. Deal with it, little boy.

Also: what was the Weimar republic if it was not a democracy?

What -is- a democracy?

Come on, expert, answer these questions.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

If I am lying then I would not be responding to your posts word

Horse is out and the barn door is closed.

I only need show that you are a liar, not that you agree to it, not to admit under any circumstances that you are wrong.

I'll point to the obvious:

Is the United KING_dom a monarchy, yes or no?

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Do you think that guilt is proven only by the words of the accused?

It certainly helps when you deny you said it, doesn't it, SuperFAG?

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Why are you lying?

Have you stopped beating your wife?

[SupaAFC]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Horse is out and the barn door is closed.
I only need show that you are a liar, not that you agree to it, not to admit under any circumstances that you are wrong.

Being wrong and lying are two different things. The problem we have here is that you think being wrong equates to lying.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll point to the obvious:
Is the United KING_dom a monarchy, yes or no?

Are all monarchies the same?

Are all mammals the same?

Are all genres the same?

Are all cars the same?

Well, in Barefootland, yes.

Your logic, your rules.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
It certainly helps when you deny you said it, doesn't it, SuperFAG?

So you -do- think that guilt can only be proven through the words of the accused.

Pretty dishonest don't you think.

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Have you stopped beating your wife?

Can you define democracy?

[-Skeptic-]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
That would make the UK a monarchy.
Let me guess: you have two degrees in an a credited university in English?
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy. You failed and lost this argument - its for all to see on topix.

Try talking about the god you have no proof of again, maybe you can win that argument?:P

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
Being wrong and lying are two different things.

Being wrong and lying about being wrong is a lie.

You told us all that it was a grammatical error.

That is a lie.

Of course, "grammatically", I should have said it is *another* lie.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Are all monarchies the same?

Now all you have to do is show the entire world where I said all monarchies were the same.

If fact: you can show us were I said any two were the same.

I guess you will have to skip past the part were I declared some of the differences between the MONARCHY of Sweden and the MONARCHY in the UK.

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy.

Poor NotBots; poor even dumber Septic.

Never happy with what the smarter Barefoot2626 has said, they are stuck making up quotes.

A constitutional monarchy is a monarchy, yes or NO?

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

Try talking about the god you have no proof of again,:P

Still waiting for your proof of my god.

Poor NotBots: liars to a core.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

Are all mammals the same?

Is a fish a mammal, yes or no?

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

<quoted text>
Being wrong and lying are two different things. The problem we have here is that you think being wrong equates to lying.
<quoted text>
Are all monarchies the same?
Are all mammals the same?
Are all genres the same?
Are all cars the same?
Well, in Barefootland, yes.
Your logic, your rules.

Then you should be able to find the quote.

If you don't have the quote, then you would be a liar.

Now... I have you a couple dozen times for the quote.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

You have dropped your demands like a hot potato as soon as I provided you with the links

This is another obvious lie.

You have not provided any "links" to the "politics degrees" you say you have because a) there are no such thing, and b) you links are meaningless.

How many times have I asked you if the UK is a monarchy, yes or no?

Do I go down the list of your lies and the questions to which you have not responded every time?

Because that would put me past the 4000 character limit before I got halfway through the list, SuperFAG.

[barefoot2626]

SupaAFC wrote:

So you -do- think that guilt can only be proven through the words of the accused.

I am amazed that you can continue to make this cr@p up.

Think about that 4K character limit.

Do let me know ahead of time when you are going to quote me so I can throw a party over here, I'll order a sheet cake and some ice cream and some pointy hats.

[barefoot2626]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy.

PS: A constitutional monarchy *IS* a monarchy.

You lost this argument the first time you opened your mouth, Septic.