In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 47711 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46912 Jan 30, 2013
[QUOTE who="SupaAFC"How about addressing the argument itself? You know, the other 95 percent of the post.
[/QUOTE]

I've addressed everything you have brought many times.

You bore me.

I am not inclined to respond to the same question since you can't seem respond to the very first question I asked.

Is the United Kingdom a monarchy, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46913 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
It is a classic tactic of fundamentalists
Still waiting for you to find anything that would indicate that I was a fundamentalist.

I understand: it is part of your rant, a prelude that you are unable to make an utterance without insisting someone -anyone- who points to the crap that falls from your sticky lips must be a fundamentalist or a Christian or whatever flavor of religion you foist upon the him/her.

You wear your NotBot badge with distinction: a first class rated idiot.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46914 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
I am asking you a question.
Questions end with this punctuation mark:?

Still waiting for you to acknowledge that you LIED about the word "unanimous" being a grammatical error.

Or, if you insist, you can pretend you were not fibbing, and acknowledge you were twice wrong.

That the opinion was not 'unanimous'.
And that your mistake was not a grammatical error.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#46916 Jan 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I object to your racism... and racist statements (as well as your misogyny).
Ö
And your cowardliness is attacking even the hypothetical wife.
Evidence?- who believes a word you say?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how many times you insist I admit to something you have invented.
Ö invent it.
YOUR WORDS, not mine
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Cherry pick = Barefoot2626 proves Skanque to be wrong yet again.
Total drippydick cuckold BS, you cant even prove if you have a moustache or not
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes... one of them entirely appointed by the monarchy, the other made up by wealthy land owners.
The USA used the UK as a model of what we did not to do in our goverment.
Ö

[QUOTE who="barefoot2626"] <quoted text>
I've seen the flags around your house: you are hip deep, Fatty.
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
UK = state church; no separation of church and state
Still dying
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Over here in the USA, the Supreme Court rules on what we have and you don't: a Constitution.
And The Constitution is the rule of the land, Skanque.
And SKANQUE:Ö
Yes we do, the difference is we donít need to worship a piece of paper

Who cares drippydick?

And drippydick again who cares that you are a cuckold?

Nope, on the first point, overridden by the Declaration of Human Rights Ė of which the UK is a signatory

Yes to tax maintained schools. Tell me how are US schools maintained?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And then I remind you that voting for an MP isn't voting for the PM.
Ö
And so does my dog.
And again I remind you how the PM is selected first by the voters and then by is party

You lying T\/\/AT I have responded to you stupid question several dozen times so once again I will remind you that I am not resident in his constituency. IT may not be the answer you want and it may not be the answer that verifies your pedantic ignorance bit it is the correct answer that applies to me.

And again I remind you that you have NO VOTE in the UK

So you class you intelligence with that of your dog, it does explain such a lot
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do remember your repeated use of the misogynistic pejoratives that you Ö t\/\/at).
You brought to the table, you sexist, racist bigot.
And lets do remember why, how you began calling me names and then picking on my husband. Followed by your racist outbursts to Straa and of course the post of your that have not got past the topix censors and been deleted.

You donít like the results of you obnoxious posts then I suggest you stop posting obnoxious posts designed to illicit such a response
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You announced that my wife had run off with a BLACK man.
Ö, Skanque?
Do you want to claim it was a grammatical error?
It is you who views the word black as racist, not me, I made the comment in response you your insults to my and my husband as well as your racist comments to Straa
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Another racist statement, thank's t\/\/it!
Say what, are you insane as well as a pedantic cuckold drippydick?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh, how soon we "forget" that you insisted that Macmillan was elected by his party to be nominated for PM.
I know: another grammatical error...

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#46917 Jan 31, 2013
Gosh your medication must need adjusting again. This is the first time I have mentioned Macmillan on ALL of topix in all the time I have been on topix

So either itís a problem with you medication or you are LYING again juts as yoyu did over your U505 rant

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46918 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidence?- who believes a word you say?
I'm not concerned with what you choose to believe, bigot.

I am able to back every single thing I say.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46919 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
Standard sexist bigot.

Let's not miss who initiated this line...Lying T\/\/AT

:)
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46920 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Total drippydick cuckold BS, you cant even prove if you have a moustache or not
I am sure mine is no comparison to yours, Skanque.

And we all know as far as real life experience, who here has had those drippydicks running across her gums.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46921 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
The members of our upper Congress: elected, Skanque, no matter how hard you stomp your feet.

Yours: appointed.

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46922 Jan 31, 2013
[QUOTE who="ChristineM"
And again I remind you how the PM is selected first by the voters and then by is party
[/QUOTE]

I *shall* remind you that this is wrong.

No matter how hard you stomp your b8ig fat lying bigoted feet.

Macmillan: an example posted many times.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46923 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Still dying
Still official State Church and will continue to be so long after they bring in the dozer to dig the hole to bury you in, Chubby.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46924 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Yes we do, the difference is we donít need to worship a piece of paper
Difference = USA has freedom of speech; freedom of religion.

Rights guaranteed.

UK = NOT.

Name of your state church, again, Chubby.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46925 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
And lets do remember why, how you began calling me names and then picking on my husband.
Don't dish it out when you can't take it, Skanque.

And I wouldn't know you have had any husbands if you didn't bring it it, Skanque.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46926 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Followed by your racist outbursts to Straa and of course the post of your that have not got past the topix censors and been deleted.
Complete nonsense, of course.

Post removed by the censors are REMOVED. The posts removed by the script leave a post removed message.

DOLT.

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!

They are removed because frequently they are double posted.

Do look at all your t\/\/at posts- your offensive sexist posts.

Still there fatty.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46927 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
It is you who views the word black as racist, not me, I made the comment in response
You insisted my 'wife" ran off with a black man.

Everyone here - including you, you ugly fat racist sexism pig - know EXACTLY what your intention was.

And IS.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46928 Jan 31, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
And again I remind you how the PM is selected first by the voters and then by is party
Macmillan.

~stomp stomp stomp~

Poor lying Skanque.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#46933 Jan 31, 2013
Barfy meltdown.
Thinking

Saffron Walden, UK

#46934 Feb 1, 2013
Doesn't he understand the implications of the 2nd Law?
bsfoot is pissing away order.
macumazahn wrote:
Barfy meltdown.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46936 Feb 1, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You did not even cite Wikipedia. I had to copy-paste your quote into Google as per usual.
I did not cite Wikipedia because I did not get it from Wikipedia. You loaded it into google and then FOUND a copy of it in wikipedia.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

From there you JUMPED to the conclusion that that is where I got it.

You did not look any further- not to the LIST of other sites including the ORIGINAL source and instead went off on the Wiki rant.

HAHAAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46937 Feb 1, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Yet when I use Wikipedia all you could comment on was the anonymous aspect of the website. Why, Barefoot, are you defending Wikipedia when you need to use it, but when I used it, you simply ignored the material?
You don't know the difference between sources, DOLT. That something put into Wikipedia isn't a FACT just because it exists there, that unless it is sourced- that we can identify who put it there- it is just an uninformed opinion.

Just as you could go to Wikipedia and insist that the UK isn't a monarchy, for example. Other readers who see that do know just how stupid you are, they don't know how many times I have caught you lying, they don't know that when you take something a person says here you don't hesitate a second to change what he said and then insist that it is a quote, even when you have changed entirely that meaning.

You don't have it in you to admit you are wrong.

Is the UK a monarchy, yes or no?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 1 hr thetruth 7,459
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr thetruth 239,089
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr thetruth 7,360
News Phil Robertson talks against Atheists 2 hr Siro 105
why Atheists believe in incest,pedophilia and b... 19 hr hpcaban 30
News .com | What hope is there without God? May 20 Kaitlin the Wolf ... 26
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) May 20 thetruth 2,171
More from around the web