In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 47823 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#46894 Jan 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
That would make the UK a monarchy.
Let me guess: you have two degrees in an a credited university in English?
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!
A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy. You failed and lost this argument - its for all to see on topix.

Try talking about the god you have no proof of again, maybe you can win that argument?:P

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46896 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Being wrong and lying are two different things.
Being wrong and lying about being wrong is a lie.

You told us all that it was a grammatical error.

That is a lie.

Of course, "grammatically", I should have said it is *another* lie.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46897 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Are all monarchies the same?
Now all you have to do is show the entire world where I said all monarchies were the same.

If fact: you can show us were I said any two were the same.

I guess you will have to skip past the part were I declared some of the differences between the MONARCHY of Sweden and the MONARCHY in the UK.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46898 Jan 30, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy.
Poor NotBots; poor even dumber Septic.

Never happy with what the smarter Barefoot2626 has said, they are stuck making up quotes.

A constitutional monarchy is a monarchy, yes or NO?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46899 Jan 30, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Try talking about the god you have no proof of again,:P
Still waiting for your proof of my god.

Poor NotBots: liars to a core.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46900 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
Are all mammals the same?
Is a fish a mammal, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46901 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
Being wrong and lying are two different things. The problem we have here is that you think being wrong equates to lying.
<quoted text>
Are all monarchies the same?
Are all mammals the same?
Are all genres the same?
Are all cars the same?
Well, in Barefootland, yes.
Your logic, your rules.
Then you should be able to find the quote.

If you don't have the quote, then you would be a liar.

Now... I have you a couple dozen times for the quote.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46902 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
You have dropped your demands like a hot potato as soon as I provided you with the links
This is another obvious lie.

You have not provided any "links" to the "politics degrees" you say you have because a) there are no such thing, and b) you links are meaningless.

How many times have I asked you if the UK is a monarchy, yes or no?

Do I go down the list of your lies and the questions to which you have not responded every time?

Because that would put me past the 4000 character limit before I got halfway through the list, SuperFAG.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46903 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
So you -do- think that guilt can only be proven through the words of the accused.
I am amazed that you can continue to make this cr@p up.

Think about that 4K character limit.

Do let me know ahead of time when you are going to quote me so I can throw a party over here, I'll order a sheet cake and some ice cream and some pointy hats.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46904 Jan 30, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
A constitutional monarchy is not the same as a monarchy.
PS: A constitutional monarchy *IS* a monarchy.

You lost this argument the first time you opened your mouth, Septic.
SupaAFC

Crieff, UK

#46905 Jan 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Being wrong and lying about being wrong is a lie.
You told us all that it was a grammatical error.
That is a lie.
Of course, "grammatically", I should have said it is *another* lie.
The fact that I acknowledged the mistake demonstrates that I accepted being wrong.

That you -still- persist in trumpeting this as if it is an almighty victory just reeks of desperation. How about addressing the argument itself? You know, the other 95 percent of the post.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Now all you have to do is show the entire world where I said all monarchies were the same.

If fact: you can show us were I said any two were the same.

I guess you will have to skip past the part were I declared some of the differences between the MONARCHY of Sweden and the MONARCHY in the UK.
I am asking you a question. Questions are not accusations. Although, your refusal to answer that question demonstrates that you are being coy about what you say in fear of committing to an argument.

It is a classic tactic of fundamentalists to be as ambiguous as possible so that you can obfuscate to your heart's content. I do not need your direct words to prove every claim for the same reason that prosecutors do not need admissions from suspects to prove guilt.

Your silence on answering my questions, complete with your continual questioning of whether Britain has a Constitution or not, demonstrates that you refuse to accept that Britain's monarchy is distinctively different to others.

Clear as crystal - a direct quote is not needed.

Of course, you can put the issue to rest by answering the question.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Poor NotBots; poor even dumber Septic.

Never happy with what the smarter Barefoot2626 has said, they are stuck making up quotes.

A constitutional monarchy is a monarchy, yes or NO?
Are all monarchies the same? Yes or no?

Are all mammals the same? Yes or no?

Are all fish the same? Yes or no?

Your silence answers my questions more than adequately.
SupaAFC

Crieff, UK

#46906 Jan 30, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Is a fish a mammal, yes or no?
Still ignoring the logic.

Nobody is denying that umbrella terms are different. What we are denying is that everything within the umbrella terms are the same which you keep implying.

That is why you cannot answer the questions regarding if everything within the terms are the same, and that is why your monarchy question is dishonest.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>Then you should be able to find the quote.

If you don't have the quote, then you would be a liar.

Now... I have you a couple dozen times for the quote.
Until you learn that evidence is not confined to the words of the accused, you are going to keep making yourself appear dishonest, desperate and infantile (although, none of which are very surprising).

Get over your lack of social skills, join a jury, then observe how court sessions actually work. You will find out very, very quickly that guilt can be proven beyond the admission of the accused.

That is what is happening here. You think if you stay quiet and do not make any direct statements, then the logic behind your arguments cannot be detected.

Your actions speak louder than your words. Start answering the questions instead of playing dumb and obtuse.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>This is another obvious lie.

You have not provided any "links" to the "politics degrees" you say you have because a) there are no such thing, and b) you links are meaningless.
Here they are again:

Undergraduate:

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/courses/undergraduate/a ...

Postgraduate MRes:

http://www.abdn.ac.uk/prospectus/pgrad/study/ ...

Located on post #46842.

You cannot say you did not see them as you cherry-picked parts of that post to respond to. So, either you did not bother reading them, or you need to get your eyes tested.

Either way, you are simply wrong about universities not giving out politics degrees. Suck it up, manchild.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
How many times have I asked you if the UK is a monarchy, yes or no?
How many times by how many posters have you been told about the dishonesty of your question?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do I go down the list of your lies and the questions to which you have not responded every time?
Such as when asked to define demo-

- oh, sorry - that would be a question -you- keep avoiding.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because that would put me past the 4000 character limit before I got halfway through the list, SuperFAG.
Speaking of refusing to answer questions, do you mind defining democracy any time soon?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>I am amazed that you can continue to make this cr@p up.

Think about that 4K character limit.

Do let me know ahead of time when you are going to quote me so I can throw a party over here, I'll order a sheet cake and some ice cream and some pointy hats.
I "made" this evidence up as much as prosecutors "made" up evidence against accused criminals.

Go to a court session. Look at the evidence that is presented. Look at what the prosecution uses.

Then, get back to me and tell me how many cases were solved based on nothing but the words of the accused.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Sweden

#46907 Jan 30, 2013
North Korea is a democracy - bsfoot book of bs rules

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46908 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that I acknowledged the mistake demonstrates that I accepted being wrong.
No, you saying the very first post that you were wrong would have demonstrated that you were wrong.

This is how it is done in English:

"Gee... I was wrong".

As you recall, you took us through the "I made a grammatical error".

Which.. in English... is a lie.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46910 Jan 30, 2013
Mikko wrote:
North Korea is a democracy - bsfoot book of bs rules
Of course not only is it a lie that you attribute this to me, I specifically said that NK is NOT a democracy.

That is what I actually said, but I know how hard it is for a NotBot to go on what I actually said.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46911 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
That you -still- persist in trumpeting this as if it is an almighty victory
Almighty?

Just another in a long line.

I like to keep it in the same breath as whether or not the UK is a monarchy, so we can all see if it is a matter of you just being wrong, or that you are a liar.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46912 Jan 30, 2013
[QUOTE who="SupaAFC"How about addressing the argument itself? You know, the other 95 percent of the post.
[/QUOTE]

I've addressed everything you have brought many times.

You bore me.

I am not inclined to respond to the same question since you can't seem respond to the very first question I asked.

Is the United Kingdom a monarchy, yes or no?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46913 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
It is a classic tactic of fundamentalists
Still waiting for you to find anything that would indicate that I was a fundamentalist.

I understand: it is part of your rant, a prelude that you are unable to make an utterance without insisting someone -anyone- who points to the crap that falls from your sticky lips must be a fundamentalist or a Christian or whatever flavor of religion you foist upon the him/her.

You wear your NotBot badge with distinction: a first class rated idiot.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46914 Jan 30, 2013
SupaAFC wrote:
I am asking you a question.
Questions end with this punctuation mark:?

Still waiting for you to acknowledge that you LIED about the word "unanimous" being a grammatical error.

Or, if you insist, you can pretend you were not fibbing, and acknowledge you were twice wrong.

That the opinion was not 'unanimous'.
And that your mistake was not a grammatical error.

“I started out with nothing”

Since: Nov 10

and still got most of it left

#46916 Jan 31, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I object to your racism... and racist statements (as well as your misogyny).
…
And your cowardliness is attacking even the hypothetical wife.
Evidence?- who believes a word you say?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how many times you insist I admit to something you have invented.
… invent it.
YOUR WORDS, not mine
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Cherry pick = Barefoot2626 proves Skanque to be wrong yet again.
Total drippydick cuckold BS, you cant even prove if you have a moustache or not
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes... one of them entirely appointed by the monarchy, the other made up by wealthy land owners.
The USA used the UK as a model of what we did not to do in our goverment.
…

[QUOTE who="barefoot2626"] <quoted text>
I've seen the flags around your house: you are hip deep, Fatty.
Lying T\/\/AT, as expected
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
UK = state church; no separation of church and state
Still dying
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Over here in the USA, the Supreme Court rules on what we have and you don't: a Constitution.
And The Constitution is the rule of the land, Skanque.
And SKANQUE:…
Yes we do, the difference is we don’t need to worship a piece of paper

Who cares drippydick?

And drippydick again who cares that you are a cuckold?

Nope, on the first point, overridden by the Declaration of Human Rights – of which the UK is a signatory

Yes to tax maintained schools. Tell me how are US schools maintained?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
And then I remind you that voting for an MP isn't voting for the PM.
…
And so does my dog.
And again I remind you how the PM is selected first by the voters and then by is party

You lying T\/\/AT I have responded to you stupid question several dozen times so once again I will remind you that I am not resident in his constituency. IT may not be the answer you want and it may not be the answer that verifies your pedantic ignorance bit it is the correct answer that applies to me.

And again I remind you that you have NO VOTE in the UK

So you class you intelligence with that of your dog, it does explain such a lot
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do remember your repeated use of the misogynistic pejoratives that you … t\/\/at).
You brought to the table, you sexist, racist bigot.
And lets do remember why, how you began calling me names and then picking on my husband. Followed by your racist outbursts to Straa and of course the post of your that have not got past the topix censors and been deleted.

You don’t like the results of you obnoxious posts then I suggest you stop posting obnoxious posts designed to illicit such a response
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You announced that my wife had run off with a BLACK man.
…, Skanque?
Do you want to claim it was a grammatical error?
It is you who views the word black as racist, not me, I made the comment in response you your insults to my and my husband as well as your racist comments to Straa
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Another racist statement, thank's t\/\/it!
Say what, are you insane as well as a pedantic cuckold drippydick?
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh, how soon we "forget" that you insisted that Macmillan was elected by his party to be nominated for PM.
I know: another grammatical error...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News As an atheist, how do I maintain my relationshi... 21 min thetruth 24
News Atheism, the Bible and sexual orientation 44 min thetruth 12
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 46 min thetruth 12,785
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 47 min thetruth 247,497
News Atheist inmate wins right to practice his faith... 12 hr QUITTNER Sep 1 2015 12
Proof of God for the Atheist 15 hr Thinking 128
Hitler was Catholic 19 hr Pagatheist 2
More from around the web