In America, atheists are still in the...

In America, atheists are still in the closet

There are 47707 comments on the Spiked story from Apr 11, 2012, titled In America, atheists are still in the closet. In it, Spiked reports that:

So do many other interest and identity groups. Complaint is our political lingua franca: it's what Occupiers, Tea Partiers, Wall Street titans, religious and irreligious people share.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Spiked.

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Sweden

#46639 Jan 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
~stomp stomp stomp~
like i said before yes you are stomping like a 3 year old child

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Sweden

#46640 Jan 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope.
<wall of text>
you are so wrong that it's ridiculous!

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Sweden

#46641 Jan 22, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop trying to pass off things that "I" say.
Especially: When you lie about it.
Your English isn't very good, and you don't speak for yourself and you try to speak for me.
And you are out of your league.
The KINGDOM of Sweden is a *monarchy*.
North Korea has elections. Is North Korea a democracy, yes or no?
you are the liar here.

the opposite of democratic is non democratic

north korea is a democracy if we fallow your rules of name of the country tells us what a country is

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46642 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok then why did he reinstate the church?
Stalin was an atheist. He reinstated the church because it helped Stalin.

As they say: keep your friends close. Keep your enemies closer.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46643 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Really does not sound like the work of an atheist to me
You aren't very bright.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46644 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Jeesus fooking christ on a crutch you drippydick cuckold moron, you use racially abusive wording to claim
Nope.

And you told everyone here that my 'wife' ran off with a *black* man.

Of course: your intent was clear.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46645 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<
Honey, you want to call me names then please do the decent thing
The names you call others reflect *your* bigotry, not mine.

You don't have to worry about me given your racist and misogynistic pejoratives a second thought, though, Skanque.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46646 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Yup, It was the first time that a response from me actually hurt you,
Oh Skanque: you are projecting.

I can guarantee I have given anything you have said a second thought.

Particularly things that have no basis on my reality here, e.g., my 'wife' running off with a black man (as you insist, which, as mentioned before, is a reflection on your prejudices rather than mine) not being married, or dripping penises... being a man, not caring though... obviously, you have had a lot of face time with wet dicks.

Again, saying more about you than me.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46647 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Actually I don’t think it offensive, although I think it’s hilarious that you should get so hot under the collar about it.
You keep insisting, sweetie, and I keep telling you men don't give a rat's ass about dripping penises.

They don't have to look at them.

And they don't roll them around in their mouths.

Eh, Skanque?

You keep bringing them up, I keep reminding you who has had the real life experience of keeping them clean.

Speaking for other men, I thank you for your work.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46648 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
If you can’t reap what you sow then don’t sow it.
So you torture metaphor as well as the Ex?
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#46649 Jan 22, 2013
Stalin couldn't f**k people's lives up without the usual compliant believers.

No church = no dictatorship.
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok then why did he reinstate the church? Why did he reinstate theological schools?, why did he reinstate the church patriarch

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46650 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
What C word, I can’t say I remember using the C word
Well, isn't that too bad everyone else here does?

Again: it says something about you, dear, not me.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46651 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Oh drippydick, I do not have an ex, I have been married to the same wonderful man since 1995,
You also told us you weren't fat.

And I can't imagine anyone knowing you as well as we know you and not escaping, no matter how henpecked.

I'll go with my gut.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46652 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
The citizens of the US vote but have no say on who will run for president, your point being what???
Americans have the vote and they have every say on who runs for the heads of the party and if they want they can run for POTUS themselves.

And have.

Are you going to tell us you have two degrees in "politics", too?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46653 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
Nope, only you and the aissie sheepshagger are stupid
Yeaa, and you will say you weren't dishing it out to him either.

Poor baby...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46654 Jan 22, 2013
[QUOTE who="ChristineM"
Don’t be jealous just because the US democratic political system is based in the British system
[/QUOTE]

The USA is a democracy.

The UK is a monarchy.

Anything else, dear?

PS: We have two houses in our Congress. We elect every single member and the houses are pretty much equal strength.

And we don't have a state church which appoints members to either house.

Or even to dog catcher...

When the US looked at the UK "system", we fixed the glaring mistakes.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46655 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
It is doubtful that any political scientist would dispute that the UK is a democracy.
Yea... too bad, political scientists begin with this: the United KING_dom is a monarchy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46656 Jan 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
The UK has never failed to meet Freedom House’s benchmark for ‘electoral democracies’
It isn't much of a benchmark: start with "Do you elect the head of state, yes or no"?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46657 Jan 22, 2013
Mikko wrote:
you are the liar here.
the opposite of democratic is non democratic
It isn't.

Putting aside: you are the one using the term 'non democratic' and trying to foist it into something I have said.

Of course: like pretty much EVERY OTHER THING you have attributed to me, it is a quote that you invent.

Be my gust: show us the link.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46658 Jan 22, 2013
Mikko wrote:
north korea is a democracy if we fallow your rules of name of the country tells us what a country is
Umm... not sure what this means in English.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 8 min showmethemoney 10,889
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 10 min ChristineW 14,664
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 30 min ChristineW 244,948
John 3:16 58 min Shizle 79
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr dirtclod 20,623
Atheists should stop feeding the stereotypes 15 hr NightSerf 18
News Si Robertson, 'Duck Dynasty' Star, Says Atheist... 19 hr thetruth 42
More from around the web